Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Scraping the bottom of the barrel: greenhouse gas emission consequences of a transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate uncertainties about conventional petroleum resources and substitutes for conventional petroleum, focusing on the impact of these uncertainties on future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We use examples from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios as a baseline for comparison. The studied uncertainties include, (1) uncertainty in emissions factors for petroleum substitutes, (2) uncertainties resulting from poor knowledge of the amount of remaining conventional petroleum, and (3) uncertainties about the amount of production of petroleum substitutes from natural gas and coal feedstocks. We find that the potential effects of a transition to petroleum substitutes on GHG emissions are significant. A transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources such as tar sands or coal-to-liquids synfuels could raise upstream GHG emissions by several gigatonnes of carbon (GtC) per year by mid-century unless mitigation steps are taken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman MA (1995) The genie out of the bottle: world oil since 1970. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson S, Newell R (2004) Prospects for carbon capture and storage technologies. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29:109–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbiroli G, Mazzaracchio P (1995) Synthetic fuel technologies as strategic pathways. Energy Sources 17(5):595–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartis JT, LaTourrette T, Dixon L, Peterson DJ, Cecchine G (2005) Oil shale development in the United States: prospects and policy issues. RAND: infrastructure, safety and environment. RAND, Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel (1998) Baseline design/economics for advanced Fischer–Tropsch Technology. U. D. F. E. T. Center, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Brenkert AL, Smith SJ, Kim SH, Pitcher HM (2003) Model documentation for the MiniCAM. Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Lab, College Park, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • British Petroleum (2005) BP statistical review of world energy. British Petroleum, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CJ, Sivertsson A (2003) Updating the depletion model. In: Second International Workshop on Oil Depletion, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • CERI (2004) Oil sands supply outlook: potential supply and costs of crude bitumen and synthetic crude oil in Canada, 2003–2017. CERI Media Briefing. CERI, Canada

  • Corke M (1998) GTL technologies focus on lowering costs. Oil Gas J 1998(September 21):71–77

  • de Vries B, van Vuuren DP, den Elzen MGJ, Janssen MA (2001) The Targets IMage Energy Regional (TIMER) model: technical documentation. RIVM REPORT. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffeyes KS (2001) Hubbert’s Peak: the impending world oil shortage. Princeton University Press, Princeton, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffeyes KS (2005) Beyond oil: the view from Hubbert’s Peak. Hill and Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dry ME (2002) The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000. Catal Today 71(3–4):227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2005) Performance profiles of major energy producers – 2003. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration (2004) International Energy Outlook. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC

  • Fleisch TH, Sills RA, Briscoe MD (2002) 2002 – emergence of the gas-to-liquids industry: a review of global GTL developments. J Nat Gas Chem 2002(11):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Gately D (2004) OPEC's incentives for faster output growth. Energy Journal 25(2):75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharbi RBC (2001) Economic optimization of EOR processes using knowledge-based system: case studies. Pet Sci Technol 19(7–8):797–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DW, Willhite GP (1998) Enhanced oil recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene DL (1999) An assessment of energy and environmental issues related to the use of gas-to-liquid fuels in transportation. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallock JL, Tharakan PJ, Hall CAS, Jefferson M, Wu W (2004) Forecasting the limits to the availability and diversity of global conventional oil supply. Energy 29(11):1673–1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch RL, Bezdek R, Wendling RM (2005) Peaking of world oil production: impacts, mitigation, and risk management: SAIC

  • Huber PW, Mills MP (2005) The bottomless well: the twilight of fuel, the virtue of waste, and why we will never run out of energy. Basic, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • IMAGE (2001) The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios: a comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change, and impacts in the 21st century. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment 2004, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson TL, Keith DW (2001) Electricity from fossil fuels without CO2 emissions: assessing the costs of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in US electricity markets. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 51(October 2001):1452–1459

    Google Scholar 

  • Klett TR (2004) Oil and natural gas resource assessment: classifications and terminology. In: Cleveland C (ed) Encyclopedia of energy. Academic, New York, pp 595–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovscek AR (2002) Screening criteria for CO2 storage in oil reservoirs. Pet Sci Technol 20(7&8):841–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunstler JH (2005) The long emergency: surviving the converging catastrophes of the twenty-first century. Atlantic Monthly, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland G (1983) Carbon-dioxide emission rates for conventional and synthetic fuels. Energy 8(12):981–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner S, Strubeggar M (1995) User’s guide for MESSAGE III. IIASA working papers. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner S, Strubeggar M (2001) Model MESSAGE command line user manual. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer RF, Attanasi ED (2003) Heavy oil and bitumen – strategic petroleum resources. USGS Fact Sheets. US Geological Survey, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritis G (2004) EOR continues to unlock oil resources. Oil Gas J 102(14):45–65

    Google Scholar 

  • NEB (2004) Canada’s oil sands: opportunities and challenges to 2015. Energy Market Assessment, National Energy Board, Canada

  • Odell PR (1999) Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy 27(12):737–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell PR (2004) Why carbon fuels will dominate the 21st century’s global energy economy. Multi-Science, Brentwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier JGJ, Bouman AF, Berdoski JJM, Veldt C, Bloos JPJ, Visschedijk AJH, van der Maas CWM, Zandveld PYJ (1999) Sectoral emission inventories of greenhouse gases for 1990 on a per country basis as well as on 1 × 1. Environ Sci Policy 2(1999):241–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parson EA, Keith DW (1998) Fossil fuels without CO2 emissions. Science 282:1053–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rattien S, Eaton D (1976) Oil Shale: the prospects and problems of an emerging energy industry. Annu Rev Energy 1:183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogner HH (1997) An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annu Rev Energy Environ 22:217–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato S, Enomoto M (1997) Development of new estimation method for CO2 evolved from oil shale. Fuel Process Technol 53:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons MR (2005) Twilight in the desert: the coming Saudi oil shock and the world economy. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer TR (1994) Trends in oil production costs in the Middle East, elsewhere. Oil Gas J 92(12):105–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens SH, Kuuskraa VA, Gale J, Beecy D (2001) CO2 injection and sequestration in depleted oil and gas fields and deep coal seams: worldwide potential and costs. Environ Geosci 8(3):200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suncor (2003) Suncor energy Inc. 9th Annual Progress Report. Suncor Energy Inc., Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada

  • Sundquist ET, Miller GA (1980) Oil shales and carbon dioxide. Science 208(4445):740–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syncrude (2004). An action plan for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: action plan and 2003 progress report. Syncrude Project, Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada

  • US Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team (2000) US Geological Survey World Petroleum Assessment 2000. T. S. Ahlbrandt. USGS, Denver, CO

  • van Vuuren DP (2005) Email communication with Detlef van Vuuren. A. Brandt, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang MQ (1999) GREET 1.5 – transportation fuel cycle model – Volume 2: appendices of data and results. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL

  • Wang M, Weber T, Finizza A, Wallace JPI (2001) Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems – North American analysis: volume I, executive summary. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Lee H, Molburg J (2004) Allocation of energy use in petroleum refineries to petroleum products – implications for life-cycle energy use and emission inventory of petroleum transportation fuels. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(1):34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm DJ, Simbeck DR, Karp AD, Dickenson RL (2001) Syngas production for gas-to-liquids applications: technologies, issues and outlook. Fuel Process Technol 71(1–3):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams B (2003) Heavy hydrocarbons playing key role in peak-oil debate, future energy supply. Oil Gas J 101(29):20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RH, Larson ED (2003) A comparison of direct and indirect liquefaction technologies for making fluid fuels from coal. Energy Sustain Dev 7(4)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, 310 Barrows Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720-3050, USA

    Adam R. Brandt & Alexander E. Farrell

Authors
  1. Adam R. Brandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander E. Farrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander E. Farrell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandt, A.R., Farrell, A.E. Scraping the bottom of the barrel: greenhouse gas emission consequences of a transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources. Climatic Change 84, 241–263 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9275-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9275-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation