Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Growth via Intellectual Property Rights Versus Gendered Inequity in Emerging Economies: An Ethical Dilemma for International Business

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we critique the emergent international normative framework of growth – the knowledge economy. We point out that the standardized character of knowledge economy’s flagship – intellectual property rights (IPRs) – has an adverse impact on women in emerging economies, such as India. Conversely, this impact on women, a significant consumer segment, has a feedback effect in terms of market growth. Conceptually, we analyze the consequences of knowledge economy and standardized IPR through a feminist lens. We extend the analyses by pointing to various contradictions surrounding growth norms; for example, there are inherent contradictions between established “formal” legalistic interpretation of IPR, “soft law” norms of corporate social responsibility, a fluid situation of moral claims of human rights, and different institutional capabilities at the international and domestic level. Consequently, we are able to demonstrate how standard IPR laws fail to deliver equity for all. We argue our case through exploring the growth aspects of the agricultural sector in India and the adverse impact of standard biopatenting on women farmers’ rights (as producers and consumers) and preservation of environment. We suggest that desired gendered equity is better achieved when there is a constellation of actors – private-sector business, the state, and civil-society leaders – working together to ensure a balanced development through tailoring of IPR to local needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson, S.A. (2007). A Match Made in the Corporate and Public Interest: Marrying Voluntary CSR Initiatives and the WTO. Journal of Trade, 41(3), 629–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerly, B. 2008a, ‘Human Rights and Social Contract Theory,’ in O’Neill, D., Shanley, M. L. & Young, I. M, (eds.) Illusion of Consent, Engaging with Carole Pateman, (The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerly, B. 2008b, Universal Human Rights in a World of Difference, (Cambridge University Press, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Addison, T.: 2008, Chronic Poverty Report 2008-09: Escaping Poverty Traps (Chronic Poverty Research Center, Manchester, UK)

  • Adi, B. (2006). ‘Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology and the Fate of Poor Farmers’ Agriculture,’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 9(1), 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, I.J. (2008). ‘Rapid Economic Growth: Contributing Factors and Challenges Ahead,’ Asian Economic. Policy Review, (December), 2, 180-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandratos, N. (2008). Food Price Surges: Possible Causes, Past Experience, and Longer-Term Relevance. Population and Development Review, 34(4), 663–697. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00245.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Castillo, F., & Feinholz, D. (2006). Women in Developing Countries and Benefit Sharing. Developing World Bioethics, 6(3), 1471–8847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B., & Konzelmann, S. (2008). In Search of a Useful Theory of the Productive Potential of Intellectual Property Rights. Research Policy, 37, 12–28. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran, A., and R. Boden: (2004), ‘Science: A Controversial Commodity,’ Science, Technology and Society 9, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran, A. and R. Boden: (2007), ‘Prometheus Bound: Accounting and the Creation of the New Science Paradigm,’ International Studies of Management and Organization, Spring 37(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S.M., & Steenkamp, J.E.M. (2006). Marketing renaissance: How Research in Emerging Markets Advances Marketing Science and Practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 337–356. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, S., Hancock, T., Lin, V., & Herzog, A. (2007). Emerging Strategies for Healthy Urban Governance. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84(1), i154–i163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M. and M. A. Chen: 2001, Globalization and the Informal Economy: How Global Trade and Investment Impact on the Working Poor (WIEGO)

  • Center for Global Development: 2007, ‘World Agriculture Faces Serious Decline from Global Warming’, www.globaldevelopmentmatters.org. Accessed September 13

  • Chittoor, R., Ray, S., Aulakh, P.S., & Sarkar, M.B. (2008). ‘Strategic responses to institutional changes: ‘Indigenous growth’ model of the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry,’. Journal of International Management, 14, 252–269. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2008.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chekol, A. A.: 2005, Granting Intellectual Property Rights in Life Forms and Processes: Does it Ensure Food Security? A Developing Country Perspective. M.A. Thesis submitted to Faculty of Law, University of the Western Cape

  • Chon, M.: 2006, ‘Intellectual Property and the Development Divide’, Cardozo Law Review 27, 2821–2912

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M., G. Dosi and E. J. Stiglitz: 2008, ‘The Future of Industrial Policies in the New Millennium: Towards a Knowledge-Centered Development Agenda’, Working Paper Series of Laboratory of Economics and Management Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, http://www.dimeeu.org./files/Cimoli-Dosi-2008-19.pdf.

  • Coriat, B., Orsi, F., & d’Almeida, C. (2006). TRIPS and the International Public Health Controversies: Issues and Challenges. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(6), 1033–1062. doi:10.1093/icc/dtl029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C. and A. Utz: 2005, ‘India and the Knowledge Economy: Leveraging Strengths and Opportunities, Overview’, in WBI Development Studies (Finance and Private Sector Development Unit, South Asia Region, The World Bank, Washington, DC)

  • DeCecco, M, 1974, Money and Empire, Basil Blackwell, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMartino, G. 2000, Global Economy, Global Justice, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wildt, G., & Khoon, C, 2008, ‘Patents or Patients? Global Access to Pharmaceuticals and Social Justice’. Medicine, Conflict and Survival, April-June, 24:S1-S5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dine, J, 2008, ‘Democratization: The Contribution of Fair Trade and Ethical Trading Movements,’ Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Winter, 15:1, 177-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth, K.E. (2008). ‘India’s Progress Towards Achieving the Targets Set in the Millennium Development Goals,’. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 54(5), 287–290. doi:10.1093/tropej/fmn088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Y. (2005). The Reasons Behind Non-Ethical Behavior in Business and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 265–279. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0134-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, W., & Whiteman, G. (2007). ‘AIDS is Not a Business’: A Study in Global Corporate Responsibility – Securing Access to Low-Cost HIV Medications,’. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 65–75. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9198-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly, M.: 2002, ‘Vandana Shiva: Seeds of Self-Reliance’, http://www.time.com/time/2002/greencentury/heroes/index_shiva.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2009

  • Gerstetter, C., B. Gorlach, K. Neumann and D. Schaffrin: 2007, ‘The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture within the Current Legal Regime Complex on Plant Genetic Resources’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 10, 259–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, H.: 2007, ‘Gender Dimensions of Intellectual Property and Traditional Medicinal Knowledge’, The International Working Group on Gender, Macroeconomics and International Economics (GEM-IWG), Volume–Internal GEM-IWG Working Paper Series, 07-07, http://www.siyanda.org/static/GEM-IWG_TMK.htm?em=0809&tag=QG.

  • Grabowski, R. (2008). An Alternative Indian Model? Journal of Asian Economics, 20(1), 50–61. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2008.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D., & Wood, N. (2006). Making Corporate Self-Regulation Effective in Developing Countries. World Development, 34(5), 868–883. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, A, 2002, ‘Indian Agriculture in a Globalizing World,’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics, August, 84:3, 754-761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. 2005, WIPO-UNEP Study on the Role of Intellectual Property Rights in the Sharing of Benefits Arising from the Use of Biological Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge, WIPO-UNEP, IIM Ahmedabad, India, http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/publications/769e_unep_tk.pdf.

  • Konde, V. (2008). Biotechnology in India: Public-Private Partnerships. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 14, 43–55. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3050079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (2008). ‘Internationalization of Indian Enterprises: Patterns, Strategies, Ownership Advantages, and Implications,’ Asian Economic. Policy Review, (December), 2, 242-261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D.L. (2008). Political Contestation in Global Production Networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, R, 2007, ‘Corporate Wealth or Public Health? WTO/TRIPS flexibilities and access to HIV/AIDS antiretroviral drugs by developing countries,’ Development in Practice, April, 17: 2, 208-219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C. (2006). Review Essay: Social Limits to the Commodification of Knowledge: Ten Years of TRIPS. Journal of International Economics, 2(1), 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. (2006). Anthropology and International Law. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 99–116. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, E.J., & Fai, F.M. (2007). ‘Innovation, Competition and Change in International Business: Emergent Research Trajectories,’ Management. International Review (Steubenville, Ohio), 47(5), 631–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, K. and P. Paul: (2003), ‘Organizational Differences in Hinduism and Islam and their Impact on the Women’s Movement on Indian Subcontinent,’ Asian Studies Review 27(December), 419–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar, D. (2006). ‘India’s Unfinished Journey: Transforming Growth into Development,’. Modern Asian Studies, 40(3), 797–832. doi:10.1017/S0026749X06002393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, D., Shanley, M.L., & Young, I.M, 2008, ‘Introduction,’ In O’Neill, D., Shanley, M. L. & Young, I. M, ed. Illusion of Consent, Engaging with Carole Pateman, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overwalle, G.V. (2005). Protecting and Sharing Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Holder and User Tools. Ecological Economics, 53, 585–607. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan, M. A.: 2005, Institutional Innovation Towards Gender Equity in Agro-Biodiversity Management: Collective Action in Kerala, South India. CAPRI Working Paper #39, International Food Policy Research Institute, June 2005

  • Padmanabhan, M.A. (2008). Collective Action in Agro-biodiversity Management: Gendered Rules of Reputation, Trust and Reciprocity in Kerala, India. Journal of International Development, 20, 83–97. doi:10.1002/jid.1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, P., Roy, A., & Mukhopadhyay, K. (2006). The Impact of Cultural Values on Marketing Ethical Norms: A Study in India and the United States of America. Journal of International Marketing, 14(4), 28–56. doi:10.1509/jimk.14.4.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, S.: 2007, ‘The WTO as a Node of Global Governance: Economic Regulation and Human Rights Discourse’, Law, Social Justice & Global Development: An Electronic Law Journal, http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2007_1. Accessed 19 Jan 2009

  • Pionetti, C.: 2006, Seed Diversity in the Drylands: Women and Farming in South India, Gatekeeper Series 126 (International Institute for Environment and Development)

  • Prasad, B.S., Pisani, M.J., & Prasad, R.M. (2008). New Criticisms of International Management: An Analytical Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 617–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragavan, S., & Mayer, J. (2007). ‘Has India Addressed Its Farmers Woes? A Story of Plant Protection Issues,’ Georgetown International. Environmental Law Review, 20(97), 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan H, C.A. Kull 2009, ‘What makes Ecology ‘Political’?: Rethinking Scale in Political Ecology,’ Progress in Human Geography, February, 33:1, 28-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1999, The Law of Peoples, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 2007, ‘Justice as Fairness: A restatement,’ in Carter, I., Kramer, M. H. & Steiner, H., (eds.), Freedom: A Philosophical Anthology, (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, S.V. (2005). Through the Lenses of Feminist Theory: Focus on Women and Technology. Frontiers, 26(1), 1–23. doi:10.1353/fro.2005.0015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayana, K., & Srivastava, S. (2007). Poverty, Health and Intellectual Property Rights with Special Reference to India. The Indian Journal of Medical Research, (October), 126, 390-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell, S. 2003, Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights (Cambridge University Press, NY).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, S. (2007). TRIPS-Plus Free Trade Agreements and Access to Medicines. The Liverpool Law Review, 28, 41–75. doi:10.1007/s10991-007-9011-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 2005-2006, ‘Human Rights and the Limits of Law’, Cardozo Law Review 27, 2913–2927

  • Sen, S., N. Russell, and A. Ozanne: 2002, ‘Broad-based Agricultural Development Vs. Food Self-Sufficiency: A General Equilibrium Analysis in India,’ Journal of Agricultural Economics, Nov., 53:3, 567-588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivramkrishna, S., & Jyotishi, A. (2008). Monopsonistic Exploitation in Contract Farming: Articulating a Strategy for Grower Cooperation. Journal of International Development, 20, 280–296. doi:10.1002/jid.1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, S.: 2005, ‘Pharmaceuticals, WTO/TRIPs and Women’, http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/esswpaper/id_3a267.htm.

  • The Corner House: 2004, ‘Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? Political Organizing Behind TRIPS’, www.cornerhouse.org.uk. Accessed Sept 2004

  • The Wall Street Journal, Economy and Politics: 2007, ‘Govt. Funds to Perk Herbal Sector,’ www.livemint.com. Accessed 29 Oct

  • Venturini, T, 2007, ‘Verba Volant, Scripta Manent: The Discontinuity Effect of Explicit Media,’ American Behavioral Scientist, March, 50:7, 879-896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, F. (2004). Legal Factors Driving Agro-biodiversity Loss. Environmental Law Network International, 1, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Denver, Denver, CO, U.S.A.

    Pallab Paul & Kausiki Mukhopadhyay

Authors
  1. Pallab Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kausiki Mukhopadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pallab Paul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, P., Mukhopadhyay, K. Growth via Intellectual Property Rights Versus Gendered Inequity in Emerging Economies: An Ethical Dilemma for International Business. J Bus Ethics 91, 359–378 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0088-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0088-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation