Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Ethics Education on Reporting Behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the impact of an ethics education program on reporting behavior using two groups of students: fourth year Masters of Accounting students who just completed a newly instituted ethics education program, and fifth year students in the same program who did not receive the ethics program. In an experiment providing both the opportunity and motivation to misreport for more money, we design two social condition treatments – anonymity and public disclosure – to examine whether or to what extent ethical values are internalized by students. We find that when participants are anonymous, misreporting rates are nearly the same regardless of ethics program participation. However, when their reporting behavior is made public to the cohort, participants who completed the ethics program misreported at significantly lower rates than those who did not receive the ethics program. The results suggest that ethics education does not necessarily result in internalized ethical values, but it can impact ethical behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adkins, N., & Radtke, R. R. (2004). ‘Students’ and Faculty Members’ Perceptions of the Importance of Business Ethics and Accounting Ethics Education: Is There an Expectations Gap?’. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 279–300. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000032700.07607.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A Field Study of Management Control Systems in a Restaurant Chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21, 271–301. doi:10.1506/VJR6-RP75-7GUX-XH0X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. (1987). Moral Development and Accounting Education. Journal of Accounting Education, 5, 27–43. doi:10.1016/0748-5751(87)90036-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Collins, E., & Power, A. A. (2006). Doing Business After the Fall: The Virtue of Moral Hypocrisy. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 321–335. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-0011-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, N., Bartholomew, E. E., Bowsher, C. A., Brown, A. L., Davidson, S., Horngren, C. T., et al. (1986). Special Reprot Future Accounting Education: Preparing for the Expanding Profession. Issues in Accounting Education, 1, 168–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beu, M.R., & Buckley, D. (2001). The Hypothesized Relationship between Accountability and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 57–73. doi:10.1023/A:1011957832141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J., & Monroe, G.S. (2003). Exploring Social Desirability Bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 291–302. doi:10.1023/A:1023648703356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.R., & Bennie, N.M. (2006). The Applicability of a Contingent Factors Model to Accounting Ethics Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9036-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.R., & Pant, L.W. (1998). The Effect of Gender and Academic Discipline Diversity on the Ethical Evaluations, Ethical Intentions and Ethical Orientation of Potential Public Accounting Recruits. Accounting Horizons, 12, 250–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.R., Pant, L.W., & Sharp, D.J. (1993). Culture-Based Ethical Conflicts Confronting Multinational Accounting Firms. Accounting Horizons, 7, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.R., Pant, L.W., & Sharp, D.J. (2001). An Examination of Difference in Ethical Decision-Making Between Canadian Business Students and Accounting Professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 319–336. doi:10.1023/A:1010745425675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B.C., & Leone, E.R. (1994). Facilitating Internationalization: The Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142 doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desplaces, D.E., Melchar, D.E., Beauvais, L.L., & Bosco, S.M. (2007). The Impact of Business Education on Moral Judgment Competence: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 73–87. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9221-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiden, R.D., Edwards, E.P., & Leanard, K.E. (2006). ‹Children’s Internalizaiton of Rules of Conduct: Role of Parenting in Alcoholic Families’. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 305–315. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.20.3.305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T.L.N., Conroy, S.J., & Stanley, C.W. (2007). ‹Ethical Attitudes of Accountants: Recent Evidence from a Practitioners’ Survey’. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 73–87. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9125-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eynon, G., Hill, N.T., & Stevens, K.T. (1997). Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1297–1309. doi:10.1023/A:1005754201952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franko, D.L., Villapiano, M., Davidson, M.M., Hamilton, E., Mintz, L.B., Green, T.C., et al. (2005). Food, Mood, and Attitude: Reducing Risk for Eating Disorders in College Women. Health Psychology, 24, 567–578. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautschi, F.H., III, & Jones, T.M. (1998). Enhancing the Ability of Business Students to Recognize Ethical Issues: An Empirical Assessment of the Effectiveness of a Course in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 205–216. doi:10.1023/A:1005740505208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, W.T., & Sims, R.R. (1994). Can Ethics be Learned? Accounting Education, 3, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins, M., & Newton, J.D. (1994). An Empirical Exploration of Complex Accountability in Public Accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 165–186. doi:10.2307/2491280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1993). Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346–380. doi:10.1006/game.1994.1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395. doi:10.2307/258867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., Massey, D.W., & Thorne, L. (2003). ‹Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning: Insights from Past Research and Implications for the Future’. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 45–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, D.S., & Murphy Smith, L. (1995). Importance of and Approaches to Incorporating Ethics into the Accounting Classroom. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 987–995. doi:10.1007/BF00872114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koonce, L., Anderson, U., & Marchant, G. (1995). Justification of Decisions in Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 33, 369–384. doi:10.2307/2491493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langenderfer, H.Q., & Rockness, J.W. (1989). Integrating Ethics into the Accounting Curriculum: Issues, Problems, and Solutions. Issues in Accounting Education, 4, 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S.E. (1988). Teaching Students Accounting Ethics: Some Crucial Issues. Issues in Accounting Education, 3, 316–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclagan, P. (2003). Varieties of Moral Issue and Dilemma: A Framework for the Anlysis of Case Material in Business Ethics Education. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 21–32. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004364.63317.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R.D. (2007). Through the Ethics Looking Glass: Another View of the World of Auditors and Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 5–14. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9079-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D.L., & Trevino, L.K. (1997). Individual and contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396. doi:10.1023/A:1024954224675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L.K., & Butterfield, K.D. (2002). Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity: A Replication and Extension to Modified Honor Code Settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–377. doi:10.1023/A:1014893102151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, K. (2001). The Other Objective of Ethics Education: Re-humanising the Accounting Profession – A Study of Ethics Education in Law, Engineering, Medicine and Accountancy. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 279–298. doi:10.1023/A:1012576631990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D.: 2002, Social Psychology, Vol. 7 (McGraw Hill, Boston, MA).

  • National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA): 2005, Rules 5–1 and 5–2 Exposure Draft, Nashville, TN.

  • National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (The Treadway Commission): 1987, Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting.

  • Park, H. (1998). Can Business Ethics be Taught?: ‹A New Model of Business Ethics Education. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 965–977. doi:10.1023/A:1006050811971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D., Rhoads, A., & Vaught, B.C. (2001). Ethical Beliefs of Business Professionals: A Study of Gender, Age and External Factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 225–232. doi:10.1023/A:1010744927551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. (1992). Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 239–258. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(92)90023-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, B.A. (2006). Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-making Process in Business Students. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 153-164. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9062-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosanas, J.M., & Velilla, M. (2005). The Ethics of Management Control Systems: Developing Technical and Moral Values. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 83–96. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-3826-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M., & Connell, J.P. (1989). Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M., Rigby, S., & King, K. (1993). Two Types of Religious Internalization and Their Relations to Religious Orientations and Mental Health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 586–596. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B.R., Weigold, M.R., & Hallam, J.R. (1990). Self-Serving Attributions in Social Context: Effects of Self-Esteem and Social Pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 855–863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.F. 1971, Internalization of Norms: A Sociological Theory of Moral Commitment (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M.K. (1994). An Analysis of the Association of Traditional Demographic Variables with the Moral Reasoning of Auditing Students and Auditors. Journal of Accounting Education, 12, 1–26. doi:10.1016/0748-5751(94)90016-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. L. and W. C. Frederick: 2001–2002, ‹Campaign AACSB: Are Business Schools Complicit in Corporate Corruption?’, Journal of Individual Employment Rights 10, 151–165. doi: 10.2190/0VJH-E5PG-V9R5-1HVE

  • Tittle, C.R. (1977). Sanction Fear and the Maintenance of Social Order. Social Forces, 55, 579–596. doi:10.2307/2577457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, B. L. (with J. Reingold): 2003, Final Accounting: Ambition, Greed, and the Fall of Arthur Andersen (Broadway Books, New York)

  • Trevino, L.K. (1992). Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education, and Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 445–459. doi:10.1007/BF00870556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, H.L., Jr, & Kaplowitz, S.A. (1977). Attitudinal conformity and anonymity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 226–234. doi:10.1086/268377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warming-Rasmussen, B., & Windsor, C.A. (2003). ‹Danish Evidence of Auditors’ Level of Moral Reasoning and Predisposition to Provide Fair Judgements’. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 77–87. doi:10.1023/A:1026044615768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1990). Measuring the Impact of Teaching Ethics to Future Managers: A Review, Assessment, and Recommendations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 183–190. doi:10.1007/BF00382643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C., McGregor, H.A., Sharp, D., Kouides, R.W., Levesque, C., Ryan, R.M., et al. (2006). Testing a Self-Determination Theory Intervention for Motivating Tobacco Cessation: Supporting Autonomy and Competence in a Clinical Trial. Health Psychology, 25, 91–101. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.F. (2003). A Study of the Adjustment of Ethical Recognition and Ethical Decision-Making of Managers-to-be Across the Taiwan Strait Before and After Receiving a Business Ethics Education. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 291–307. doi:10.1023/A:1024167503455

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Accounting and Information Systems, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, U.S.A.

    Brian W. Mayhew

  2. Queen’s School of Business, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada, K7L 3N6

    Pamela R. Murphy

Authors
  1. Brian W. Mayhew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela R. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela R. Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayhew, B.W., Murphy, P.R. The Impact of Ethics Education on Reporting Behavior. J Bus Ethics 86, 397–416 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9854-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9854-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation