Skip to main content
Log in

Moral Issues and Gender Differences in Ethical Judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) Multidimensional Ethics Scale: Implications in Teaching of Business Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we examined moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s [Journal of Business Ethics 9 (1990) 639) multidimensional ethics scale (MES). A total of 340 undergraduate students were asked to provide ethical judgment by rating three moral issues in the MES labeled: ‚sales’, ‚auto’, and ‚retail’ using three ethics theories: moral equity, relativism, and contractualism. We found that female students’ ratings of ethical judgment were consistently higher than that of male students across two out of three moral issues examined (i.e., sales and retails) and ethics theories; providing support for Eagly’s [1987, Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role Interpretation. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, England)] social role theory. After controlling for moral issues, women’s higher ratings of ethical judgment over men’s became statistically non-significant. Theoretical and practical implications based on the study’s findings are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp T. L., Bowie N. E. (eds.) 1979, Ethical Theory and Business. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer M., C. Gratto, J. Gravander, M. Tuttle: 1987, A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 6(4), 265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun R.: 2005 Ethical Character and Virtue of Organization: An Empirical Assessment and Strategic Implications. Journal of Business Ethics 57(3), 269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier J. 2006 The Art of Moral Imagination: Ethics in the Practice of Architecture. Journal of Business Ethics 66(2–3): 307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa P. T., R. McCrae: 1992, The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggs B. J.: 1982, Utilitarianism and Contractarianism. In: H. B. Miller, W. H. Williams (eds), The Limits of Utilitarianism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., T. Dunfee: 1999, Ties that Bind: A Social Contract Approach to Business Ethics. Harvard University Business School Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee: 2002, ‚A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics’, in T. Donalson, P. Werhane and M. Cording (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach (Prentice-Hall)

  • Eagly A. H.: 1987, Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldberg R., E. Glenn: 1979, Male and Female: Job versus Gender Models in the Sociology of Work. Social Problems 26(5): 524–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. C. 1985. A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49: 87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge: MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg L. R. (1999) A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor model. In: Mervielde I., Deary I., De Fruyt F., Ostendorf F (Eds) Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol 7. Tilburg Universitzress Press, Tilburg, The Netherlands pp. 7–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman M. E., Wallen A. S., Fuchs D. 2004. Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed At Male Gender-Typed Tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 416–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough L. M., Oswald F. L., Ployhart R. E. 2001. Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence, and Lessons Learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9: 152–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S. D., Vitell S. 1986. A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macro-Marketing, 6: 5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee S., Hyde J. S. 2000. Gender Differences in Moral Orientation: A Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126: 703–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. 1991. Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16: 366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W.: 2004, ‚The Social Contract Tradition’, in P. Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics, 2004 edition (Blackwell Publishing Limited, Malden, MA), pp. 186–196

  • Landry R., Moyes G. D., Cortes A. C. 2004. Ethical Perceptions Among Hispanic Students: Differences by Major and Gender. Journal of Education for Business, 80: 102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo R. 2001. Encouraging Classroom Discussion of Ethical Dilemmas in Research Management: Three Vignettes. Teaching Business Ethics, 5: 195–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. M.: 2003, `An Analysis of the Factor Structure of the Multidimensional Ethics Scale and a Perceived Moral Intensity Scale, and the Effects of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment', Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 63(8-B), Mar 39–67

  • Mesmer-Magnus J. R., Viswesvaran C. 2005. Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62: 272–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones D. S., Viswesvaran C. (2001). Integrity Tests and Other Criterion-Focused Occupational Personality Scales (COPS) Used in Personnel Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9: 31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach R. E., Robin D. P. 1988. Some Initial Steps Toward Improving the Measurement of Ethical Evaluations of Marketing Activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 7: 871–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach R. E., Robin D. P. 1990. Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9: 639–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach R. E., Robin D. P., Dawson L. E. 1991. An Application and Extension of a Multidimensional Ethics Scale to Selected Marketing Practices and Marketing Groups. Journal of Marketing Science, 19: 83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. 1986. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger Press: NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D. and L. Babin: 1997, ‚Making Sense of the Research on Gender and Ethics in Business: A Critical Analysis and Extension’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 61–90

  • Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd ed. Harper Collins: New York: NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint L., Webb J. R. (2005). Gender Differences in the Relationship Between Empathy and Forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 145: 673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K. 1986. Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review, 11: 601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J. 1996. Influences Upon Managerial Moral Decision Making: Nature of the Harm and Magnitude of Consequences. Human Relations, 49: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhane, P. H.: 2002, ‚The Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, in T. Donaldson, P. H. Warhane and M. Cording (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach (2002 edition) (Prentice-Hall , Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 83–97

  • Winstead, B. A., Derlega, V. J. and Unger, R. K.: 1999, ‚Sex and Gender’, in V. J. Derlega, B. A. Winstead and W. H. Jones (eds.), Personality: Contemporary Theory and Research, 2nd ed. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), pp. 257–281

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Robert Farmer and Frederick Wheeler for their assistance in this research. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nhung T. Nguyen.

Additional information

Nhung T. Nguyen, assistant professor of human resource management at Towson University, received her Ph.D. in management from Virginia Commonwealth University in 2001. Her research focuses on the use of situational judgement and personality tests in personnel selection, ethics in management education, and the application of meta-analysis and structural equations modeling in organizational research. Her research has appeared in the Journal of Applied Psychology, the International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Applied H.R.M. Research, and Journal of Applied Social Psychology among others.

M. Tom Basuray, Professor of Management at Towson University, received his Ph.D. in Business Administration in 1974 from University of Oklahoma. His research interests are in areas of organizational effectiveness, leadership and development. His articles have appeared in Journal of Organizational Change Management, Education & Psychological Measurement, International Journal of Management, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, and Journal of Experiential Learning and Simulation. He has consulted with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Public Broadcasting Corporation, and various state and municipal government agencies both in Maryland and North Dakota.

William P.Smith, Associate Professor of Management in the College of Business and Economics at Towson University, received his Ph.D. in Business Administration from Arizona State University in 1982. His research interests include business ethics, privacy in the workplace and the role of social activism in corporate governance.

Donald Kopka, an Assistant Professor at Towson University, received his Ph.D., in International Business from George Washington University in 1995. He teaches Business Strategy, Management Principles, and Entrepreneurship and Small Business, and was Director of the Cornerstone-Professional Experience Program in the College of Business and Economics from 1999–2003. In 2004 he was a Fulbright Scholar in Vietnam where he taught entrepreneurship and business strategy, worked on curriculum development, and conducted ongoing research on supporting industries. Information on his Fulbright experience can be found at his website http://www.towson.edu/~kopka. His research interests include entrepreneurship, business development, and teaching pedagogy. He formerly ran a property management business, was a program manager at the U.S. Small Business Administration, and served as a Peace Corps Volunteer in the Philippines.

Donald N. McCulloh, Lecturer in Management at Towson University, received his M.S. degree in Financial Management from The George Washington Unversity in 1968. He teaches Management Principles and has also taught Leadership. He served as Vice President for Administration and Finance at Towson University until his retirement in 1997, since then he has been a full-time member of the Management faculty. He has also served in the United States Air Force, and worked in several manufacturing industries and the automotive industry. He was Executive Director of a non-profit community development corporation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nguyen, N.T., Basuray, M.T., Smith, W.P. et al. Moral Issues and Gender Differences in Ethical Judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) Multidimensional Ethics Scale: Implications in Teaching of Business Ethics. J Bus Ethics 77, 417–430 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9357-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9357-9

Keywords

Navigation