Skip to main content
Log in

Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors use empirical research into the environmental practices of 31 manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to show that ‚business performance’ and ‚regulation’ considerations drive behaviour. They suggest that this is inevitable, given the market-based decision-making frames that permeate and dominate the industry in which manufacturing SMEs operate. Since the environment is a pillar of corporate social responsibility (CSR), the findings have important implications for CSR policy, which promotes voluntary actions predicated on a business case. It is argued that this approach will not alter the behaviour of manufacturing SMEs significantly because CSR practice will be regarded as an optional and costly ‚extra’ affecting core business activity. Consequently, the use and development of existing regulatory structures, providing minimum standards for many activities covered by CSR, remains the most effective means through which the behaviour of manufacturing SMEs will be changed in the short to medium-term. Another feature of the paper is the distinction made between ‚business performance’ and the ‚business case’ argument. Business performance emphasises cost reductions and efficiency whereas the business case accentuates the benefits to shareholders of good practices as their firms become more attractive to stakeholders and society. Manufacturing SMEs␣try to improve business performance because of the pressures placed on them by market-dominated decision-making frames. These frames do not encourage manufacturing SMEs to undertake voluntary actions for the benefit of wider stakeholders and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armscott R., Hosseini J., Morris S., Rehbein K. (1991). An Empirical Comparison of Direct Questioning, Scenario and Randomized Response Methods for Obtaining Sensitive Business Information. Decision Sciences 22(5):1073–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrowsmith J., Gilman M., Edwards P., Ram M. (2003). The Impact of the National Minimum Wage in Small Firms. British Journal of Industrial Relations 41(3):435–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AWM – Advantage West Midlands.: 2004, Manufacturing Cluster Action Plan 2005–2008, September http://www.advantagewm.co.uk/manufacturing-cluster-action-plan.pdf

  • Bansal P., Roth K. (2000). Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43(4):717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baptiste I. (2001). Educating Lone Wolves: Pedagogical Implications of Human Capital Theory. Adult Education Quarterly 51(3):184–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton J. (1971). Small Firms: Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Small Firms. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • BRTF – Better Regulation Task Force.: 1999, Regulation and Small Firms: Progress Report, July http://www.brc.gov.uk/downloads/pdf/smallfirmsinterim.pdf

  • BRTF – Better Regulation Task Force.: 2000, Helping Small Firms Cope with Regulation – Exemption and Other Approaches, April http://www.brc.gov.uk/downloads/pdf/smallfirms.pdf

  • Buechler S. (2000). Social Movements in Advanced Capitalism: The Political Economy and Cultural Construction of Social Activism. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns P. (2001). Entrepreneurship and Small Business. Palgrave Publishers, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Buston, K.: 1997, ‚NUD.IST in Action: Its Use and Its Usefulness in a Study of Chronic Illness in Young People’, Sociological Research Online, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/3/6.html

  • Carroll A. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review 4(3):497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castka P., Balzarova M., Bamber C., Sharp J. (2004). How Can SMEs Effectively Implement the CSR Agenda? A UK Case Study Perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11:140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain N. (1973). The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Basic Books: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, R. and C. Tatton-Brown: 1979, Impact of Employment Legislation on Small Firms (Research Paper 6, Department of Employment)

  • Cowe, R.: 2003, ‚Behave Responsibly, By Order of the Law’, New Statesman, May, 132

  • de Bruijn T., Tukker A. (2002). Partnership and Leadership. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean T., Brown R., Stango V. (2000). Environmental Regulation as a Barrier to the Formation of Small Manufacturing Establishments: A Longitudinal Examination. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40:56–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechant K., Altman B. (1994). Environmental Leadership: From Compliance to Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive 8(3):7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper S. (2000). Corporate Nirvana. Is the Future Socially Responsible?. Industrial Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Druker J., White G., Stanworth C. (2005). Coping with Wage Regulation. International Small Business Journal 23(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DTI – Department of Trade and Industry.: 2001, Business and Society: Developing Corporate Social Responsibility in the UK (March), (London, DTI)

  • DTI – Department of Trade and Industry.: 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government Update, May http://www.csr.gov.uk/pdf/dti_csr_final.pdf?pubpdfdload = 04%2F1112

  • Dudley, B.: 2004, ‚State’s Tech Leaders Look Ahead’, The Seattle Times, December

  • EC – European Commission.: 2001, Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Reasonability (Green Paper, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of␣the European Communities), July http://www. ec.europa.eu/employment_social/publications/2001/ke3701590_en.pdf

  • EC – European Commission.: 2002a, European SMEs and Social and Environmental Responsibility (Observatory of European SMEs, Report 2002/No 4. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities), http://www.ec.europa.eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/analysis/doc/smes_observatory_2002_ report4_en.pdf

  • EC – European Commission.: 2002b, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development (Brussels 347 final, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities), July http://www.ec.europa.eu/employment_ social/publications/2002/ke4402488_en.pdf.

  • EC – European Commission.: 2003, Mapping Instruments for Corporate Social Responsibility, (Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities), April http://www.ec.europa.eu/employment_social/publications/2004/ke1103002_en.pdf

  • EC – European Commission.: 2004, SMEs in Europe 2003 (Observatory of European SMEs: Report 2003, No. 7, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities), http://www.ec.europa. eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/analysis/doc/smes_ob servatory_2003_report7_en.pdf

  • Edwards P., Ram M., Black J. (2004). Why Does Employment Legislation Not Damage Small Firms? Journal of Law and Society 31(2):245–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency.: 2003, SME-nvironment 2003, http://www.netregs.gov.uk/commondata/acrobat/smen vironment_uk_2003.pdf

  • European Environment Agency.: 2003, Environmental Assessment Report No. 10 – Europe’s Environment: The Third Assessment (Luxembourg: Office for Official␣Publications of the European Communities), http://www.reports.eea.europa.eu/environmental_ assessment_report_2003_10/en/tab_content_RLR

  • Fisher R. (1993). Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning. Journal of Consumer Research 20:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, I.: 2001, ‚A Small Business Perspective on Regulation in the UK’, Institute of Economic Affairs, June

  • Friedman, M.: 1968, ‚The Methodology of Positive Economics’, reprinted in Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Science (McMillan, New York)

  • Friedman M. (1970a). Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine 13:122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M. (1970b). Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiser K., Crul M. (1996). Greening of Small and Medium-sized Firms: Government, Industry and NGO Initiatives. In: Groenwegan P., Kischer K., Jenkins E., Schot J. (eds) The Greening of Industry Resource Guide and Bibliography. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin T. (1993). The Meaning of Greening: A Plea for Organisational Theory. In: Fischer K., Schot J. (eds) Environmental Strategies for Industry. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B. (1992). Emergence vs Forcing: Basis of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffee R., Scase R. (1995). Corporate Realities: The Dynamics of Large and Small Organisations. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman J., Earnshaw J., Marchington M., Harrison R. (1998). Unfair Dismissal Cases, Disciplinary Procedures, Recruitment Methods and Management Style: Case Study Evidence from Three Industrial Sectors. Employee Relations 20(6):536–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOWM – Government Office for the West Midlands (2006/07) Business Plan, http://www.go-wm.gov.uk/gowm/docs/228892/392855/BusPlan0607v2

  • Graafland J., Smid H. (2004). Reputation, Corporate Social Responsibility and Market Regulation. Tijdchrift voor Economie en Management 49(2):271–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray B. (2003). Framing of Environmental Disputes. In: Lewicki R., Gray B., Elliott M. (eds) Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Disputes. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths B. (2001). The Business Corporation as a Moral Community. In: Griffiths B., Sirico R., Barry N., Field F. (eds) Capitalism, Morality and Markets. Institute of Economic Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham N., Grabosky P. (1998). Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, P.: 2005, Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement (The Hampton Review, Final Report, HM Treasury), http://www.hm-treasury. gov.uk/media/A63/EF/bud05hamptonv1.pdf

  • Harris L. (2002). Small Firm Responses to Employment Regulation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 9(3):296–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques I., Sadorsky P. (1996). The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsible Firm: An Empirical Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30:381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillary R. (1995). Small Firms and the Environment: A Groundwork Status Report. The Groundwork Foundation, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes R., Skea J., Whelan B. (1997). Clean and Competitive? Motivating Environmental Performance in Industry. Earthscan Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H.: 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility: Engaging Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in the Debate (Working Paper Series No. 18, Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability & Society), http://www.brass.cf.ac.uk/uploads/wpcsrengagingsmesHJ0904.pdf.

  • Kingston University.: 2005, Regulation and Small Firm Performance and Growth: A Review of the Literature (Small Business Research Centre, Kingston University, January)

  • KPMG (1997). The Environmental Challenge and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Europe. KPMG Environmental Consulting, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki R., Saunders D., Minton J. (1999). Negotiation, 5th edition. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Liikanen, E.: 2000, Spearheading the Digital Economy in Europe – An Enterprise Policy for SMEs, Commissioner for Enterprise and Information Society at the BDI and DIHT Annual Meeting Brussels, May http://www.ec. europa.eu/comm/archives/commission_1999_2004/ liikanen/media/speeches/index_en.htm

  • MacEwan A. (2000). Neo-liberalism or Democracy?: Economic Strategy, Markets and Alternatives for the 21st Century. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall Report.: 1998, Economic Instruments and the Business Use of Energy, (Report to Chancellor of the Exchequer, HM Treasury, London)

  • Morse J., Richards L. (2002). Read First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M.: 2000, ‚Washington Consensus or Washington Confusion?’, Foreign Policy, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 118, Spring, 1–22

  • Nath S. (1973). A Perspective of Welfare Economics. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Netregs.: 2002, How Green are Small Businesses? Netregs Benchmarking Survey of Environmental Awareness, http://www.netregs.gov.uk/commondata/acrobat/nrbs2002. pdf

  • OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.: 2001, Businesses’ Views on Red Tape: Administrative and Regulatory Burdens on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (OECD Publishing, September)

  • OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.: 2002, OECD Small and Medium Enterprise Outlook (OECD Publishing, December)

  • Patton D., Worthington I. (2003). SMEs and Environmental Regulations: A Study of the UK Screen-Printing Sector. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21:549–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts J. (2000). The Regulator-Regulated Relationship and Environmental Protection: Perceptions in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Environment and Planning: Government and Policy 18:191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts J., Herd A., Gerrard S., Horne C. (1999). The Climate and Culture of Environmental Compliance within SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment 8:14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PIU/SBS.: 2001, A Briefing Paper by the Performance and Innovation Unit (PIU) and Small Business Service (SBS), http://www.number-10.gov.uk/su/small%20 business/briefing.pdf

  • Roberts, D.: 2003, ‚CBI Fears High-Skilled Jobs Exodus’, The Economist, November 17, 1

  • Roberts, D.: 2004, ‚Corporate US begins to reflect SARBANES-OXLEY, FT Report – Responsible Business’, The Financial Times, November 29

  • Roth, J. and B. Sheppard: 1995, ‚Opening the Black Box of Framing Research: The Relationship between Frames, Communication and Outcomes’, Academy of Management Journal (Best Paper Proceedings), 94–98

  • Sarbutts N. (2003). Can SMEs ‚do’ CSR? A Practitioner’s View of the Ways Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises are Able to Manage Reputation Through Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Communication Management 7(4):340–347

    Google Scholar 

  • SBC – Small Business Council.: 2004, Annual Report (Small Business Council, London), http://www.sbs.gov.uk/SBS_Gov_files/sbc/sbc_annual_report04.pdf.

  • SBS – Small Business Service.: 2004, A Government Action Plan for Small Business: Evidence Base (Small Business Service, London), http://www.sbs.gov.uk/SBS_ Gov_files/corporateinfo/sbs_evidence.pdf.

  • Schaper M. (2002). The Challenge of Environmental Responsibility and Sustainable Development: Implications for SME and Entrepreneurship Academics. In: Füglistaller U., Pleitner H., Volery T., Weber W. (eds) Radical Changes in the World: Will SMEs Soar or Crash?. Rencontres de St Gallen, St Gallen: Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S., Starik M. (2002). Research in Corporate Sustainability: The Evolving Theory and Practice of Organizations in the Natural Environment. Edward Elgar, Northampton MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M., Kemp R. (1998). Small Firms and the Environment 1998: A Groundwork Report. Birmingham, Groundwork

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner G., Steiner J. (1997). Business, Government and Society – A Managerial Perspective. McGraw-Hills, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A., Corbin J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson G. (1990). The Political Economy of the New Right. Continuum International Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley F. (1999). The Gap Between the Environmental Attitudes and the Environmental Behaviour of Small Firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 8:238–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers I., James P., Smallbone D., Baldock R. (2005). Understanding Small Firm Reponses to Regulation: The Case of Workplace Health and Safety. Policy Studies 26(2):149–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh J. (2004). In Their Own Words: Red Tape Case Studies from IoD Members. IoD Policy Paper, Institute of Directors, London

    Google Scholar 

  • WBI – World Bank Institute.: 2004, Can Small Be Responsible? The Possibilities and Challenges of Corporate Social Responsibility among Small and Medium Enterprises (edited by Michael Jarvis: WBI Series on Corporate Responsibility, Accountability and Sustainable Competitiveness), http://www.info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/126862/small_responsible.pdf

  • Welford R. (1994). Cases in Environmental Management and Business Strategy. Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R.: 2003, Corporate Social Responsibility in European and Asia: Critical Elements and Best Practice (CUPEM, University of Hong Kong, May)

  • Williamson D., Lynch-Wood G. (2001). A New Paradigm for SME Environmental Practice. The TQM Magazine 13(6):424–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J. (2000). What Should the World Bank Think About the Washington Consensus?. World Bank Research Observer, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 15(2):251–264

    Google Scholar 

  • WMES&AP.: 2004–2010, West Midlands Economic Strategy and Action Plan, 2004–2010, Delivering Advantage, http://www.advantagewm.co.uk/west-midlands-economic-strategy.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Williamson.

Additional information

David Williamson is Senior Research Fellow in the area of Corporate and Environmental Responsibility at the School of Law, University of Manchester, UK. He has conducted extensive empirical studies into, and written papers on, the environmental behaviour of small and medium sized enterprises. He is also Chair of INDECO, a national body that coordinates sustainable development work on business parks.

Gary Lynch-Wood is a Lecturer at the School of Law, University of Manchester, UK. His research focuses on regulation, particularly the impact that regulation has on small and medium-sized enterprises. He teaches a variety of subjects including regulation, environmental law, corporate responsibility and legal methods. He was a Director of the Centre for Research into Corporate Responsibility and the Environment prior to his move to the University of Manchester.

John Ramsay is a Reader at the School of Business and Law, Staffordshire University, UK. He has had a number of careers including a decade spent working in the Purchasing Function of a large British component supplier to the European car industry. He teaches a variety of subjects including South East Asian economic development and Negotiation. He is widely published in the Purchasing field with practitioner papers dating back to the 1970s when he was junior buyer, developing in more recent years into academic work in his research area of Buyer–supplier interaction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G. & Ramsay, J. Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR. J Bus Ethics 67, 317–330 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9187-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9187-1

Keywords

Navigation