Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After providing an overview of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) research in different contexts, and noting the varied methodologies adopted, two robust CSR conceptualizations – one by Carroll (1979, ‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’, The Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497–505) and the other by Wood (1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, The Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691–717) – have been adopted for this research and their integration explored. Using this newly synthesized framework, the research critically examines the CSR approach and philosophy of eight companies that are considered active in CSR in the Lebanese context. The findings suggest the lack of a systematic, focused, and institutionalized approach to CSR and that the understanding and practice of CSR in Lebanon are still grounded in the context of philanthropic action. The findings are qualified within the framework of existing contextual realities and relevant implications drawn accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abreu R., David F., Crowther D. (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility in Portugal Empirical Evidence of Corporate Behavior. Corporate Governance 5(5): 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard R. (2000) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Belal A. (2001) A Study of Corporate Social Disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal 15(5): 274–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush G. (2005) Corporate Citizenship As Part of the Business Model. In: Hancock J. (ed) Investing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning and the UK’s Leading Companies. Kogan Page, London, pp. 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Business for Social Responsibility: 2001, Introduction to Corporate Social Responsibility. [Online] available: http://www.bsr.org/bsrresources/WhitePapers_IssueArea.cfm

  • Carroll A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review 4(4):497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A. B. (1991). The Pyramid Of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons 34:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson M. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework For Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Responsibility. The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement-Jones T. (2005). Bottom Line Issue Or Public Relations Exercise?. In: Hancock J. (ed) Investing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning and the UK’s Leading Companies. Kogan Page, London, pp. 5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.: 1973, ‘The Case For and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Journal June, 312–322

  • De la Crus Deniz Deniz M., Cabrera Suarez K. (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility and Family Business in Spain. Journal of Business Ethics 56: 27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2. Business and Society 33(2): 150–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulop G., Hisrich R., Szegedi K. (2000). Business Ethics and Social Responsibility in Transition Economies. Journal of Management Development 19(1): 5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. and J. Matthews: 2003, ‘Can A Corporation Have A Conscience?’ Harvard Business Review on Corporate Social Responsibility, Harvard Business School Press: 131–155

  • Greenfield, W. M.: 2004, ‘In the Name of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Business Horizons January–February, 19–28

  • Hancock J. (2005). Introduction: Why This Subject? Why This Book?. In: Hancock J. (ed) Investing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning and the UK’s Leading Companies. Kogan Page, London, pp. 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, I. and J. Nelson: 2004, ‘Values-Driven Performance: Seven Strategies For Delivering Profits With Principles’, Ivey Business Journal 69(2) November/December, 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M. (1999). The Institutional Determinants of Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 20(2): 163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juholin E. (2004). For Business Or The Good Of All? A Finnish Approach To Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Governance 4(3): 20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos G. P. (2001). The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing 18(7): 595–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo M., Mura M., Bonoli A. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance: The Case of Italian SMEs. Corporate Governance 5(4):28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luetkenhorst W. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Development Agenda. Intereconomics 39(3): 157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makower J. (1994). Beyond the Bottom Line. Simon and Schuster, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire J. (1963). Business and Society. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A.: 2005, ‘The Economy, Business: Will Social Responsibility Harm Business?’ The Wall Street Journal May 18, A2

  • Novak M. (1996). Business as a Calling: Work and the Examined Life. The Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Papasolomou-Doukakis I., Krambia-Kapardis M., Katsioloudes M. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Way Forward? Maybe Not. European Business Review 17(3): 263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P.: 2005, ‘Responsibility Incorporated’, Paper presented at the Kadish Center for Morality, Law and Public Affairs, Workshop in Law, Philosophy and Political Theory, March 23, 2005

  • Pratima B. (2002). The Corporate Challenges of Sustainable Development. Academy of Management Executive 16(2): 122–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Quazi A., O’Brien D. (2000). An Empirical Test of a Cross-National Model of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 25: 33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, P. Letters To The Editor: 2005, ‘An Adam Smith Look At Green Regulations’, The Wall Street Journal June 6

  • Solomon R. C. (1994). The New World of Business: Ethics and Free Enterprise in the Global Nineties. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tencati A., Perrini F., Pogutz S. (2004). New Tools To Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 53: 173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner L., van Goor-Balk A., Masurel E. (2004). Family Business and Corporate Social Responsibility In A Sample of Dutch Firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11(2):186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S., Bodwell C., Graves S. (2002) Responsibility: The New Business Imperative. The Academy of Management Executive 16(2): 132–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor D. (2001). The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 9(3): 225–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood D. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. The Academy of Management Review 16(4): 691–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development: 2001, The Business Case for Sustainable Development: Making a Difference Towards the Johannesburg Summit 2002 and Beyond. [Online] available: http://www.wbcsd.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dima Jamali.

Additional information

Dr. Jamali is Assistant Professor of Management at the Olayan School of Business, American University of Beirut. She holds a BA in Public Administartion from the American University of Beirut, and a Ph.D. in Social Policy and Administration, from the University of Kent at Canterbury, UK. Her research interests encompass corporate social responsibility, public private partnerships, learning organizations and women issues. She worked as an expert consultant on projects funded by the World Bank, the US Agency for International Development, NGOs, and other regional and local public and private firms. She is the author of numerous studies and international peer reviewed publications in various international journals, including the Journal of Management Development, the International Journal of Public Sector Management, the International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Business Process Management Journal, Public Works, Management and Policy and Women in Management Review.

Ramez Mirshak Graduated with honors from the American University in Cairo (AUC) with a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration in February 2001, then worked for two years in Egypt in the field of marketing and management. In 2004–2005, pursued his Masters of Business Administration at the American University of Beirut (AUB), researching primarily issues relating to change management and corporate social responsibility under the supervision of Dr. Dima Jamali, then joined a leading international financial institution as a regional Management Associate, while maintaining links with AUB and working on several research based projects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamali, D., Mirshak, R. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context. J Bus Ethics 72, 243–262 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9168-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9168-4

Keywords

Navigation