Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility and Long-term Compensation: Evidence from Canada

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This paper examines the association between long-term compensation and corporate social responsibility (CSR) for 90 publicly traded Canadian firms. Social responsibility is considered to include concerns for social factors and the environment (e.g. Johnson, R. and D. Greening: 1999, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 564-578; Kane, E. J. (2002, Journal of Banking and Finance 26:, 1919-1933; McGuire, J. et al. 2003, Journal of Business Ethics 45 (4), 341-359). Long-term compensation attempts to focus executives’ efforts on optimizing the longer term, which should direct their attention to factors traditionally associated with socially responsible executives (Mahapatra, S. 1984, Journal of Financial Economicsit 20, 347-376). As hypothesized, we found a significant relationship between the long-term compensation and total CSR weakness as well as the product/environmental weakness dimension of CSR. In addition, we found a marginally significant relationship between long-term compensation and total corporate responsibility. Our findings are that executives’ long-term compensation is associated with a firm’s environmental actions, and that firms that utilize long-term compensation are more likely to mitigate product/environment weaknesses than those that do not. Implications for practice and research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Y. Amihud B. Lev (1981) ArticleTitle‘Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers’ Bell Journal of Economics 12 605–617

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Baiman (1982) ArticleTitle‘Agency Research in Managerial Accounting: A Survey’ Journal of Accounting Literature 1 154–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants: 2001, Measuring the Business Value of Stakeholder Relationships – Part 1 (CICA, Toronto)

  • A. Carroll (1979) ArticleTitle‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance’ Academy of Management Review 4 497–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1991). ‘CSR Measurement: A Commentary on Methods for Evaluating an Elusive Construct’. in J. E. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 12, (JAI Press, Greenwich, T), pp. 184–401

  • M.B.E. Clarkson (1995) ArticleTitle‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Social Performance’ Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 92–117

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Craighead M. Magnan L. Thorne (2004) ArticleTitle‘The Impact of Mandated Disclosure on Performance-Based CEO Compensations’ Contemporary Accounting Review, 21 IssueID2 369–397

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Delfgaauw (2000) ArticleTitle‘Reporting on Sustainable Development: A Preparer’s View’ Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19 (Supplement) 67–74 Occurrence Handle10.2308/aud.2000.19.supplement.67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu: 2002, Deloitte Environmental Reporting, http://www.deloitte-sustainable.com

  • D.W. Diamond R. Verrecchia (1982) ArticleTitle‘Optimal Managerial Contracts and Security Prices’ Journal of Finance 41 275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Gomez-Mejia H. Tosi T. Hinkin (1987) ArticleTitle‘Managerial Control, Performance and Executive Compensation’ Academy of Management Journal 30 51–70

    Google Scholar 

  • S.B. Graves S.A. Waddock (1994) ArticleTitle‘Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance’ Academy of Management Journal 37 IssueID4 1034–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Griffin J.F. Mahon (1997) ArticleTitle‘The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-five Years of Incomparable Results’ Business and Society 36 5–31

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gujarati (2003) Basic Econometrics, 4th Edition McGraw Hill New York. 638–640

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Harris A. Raviv (1979) ArticleTitle‘Optimal Incentive Contracts with Imperfect Information’ Journal of Economic Theory 20 231–259

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Hemmer (1993) ArticleTitle‘Risk-free Incentive Contracts: Eliminating Agency Cost Using Option-Based Compensation’ Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 447–474

    Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Hillman G.D. Keim (2001) ArticleTitle‘Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?’ Strategic Management Journal 22 125–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer D., and Suh Y. (1992). ‘Risk, Managerial Effort and Project Choice’. Journal of Financial Inter-Mediation 308–345

  • B. Holmstrom (1979) ArticleTitle‘Moral Hazard and Observability’ Bell Journal of Economics 10 74–91

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Jensen W. Meckling (1976) ArticleTitle‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure’ Journal of Financial Economics 3 305–360

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Johnson D. Greening (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance’ Academy of Management Journal 42 IssueID5 564–578

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Kane (2002) ArticleTitle‘Using Deferred Compensation to Strengthen the Ethics of Financial Regulation’ Journal of Banking and Finance 26 1919–1933

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Magill M. Quinzii (1996) Theory of Incomplete Markets MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Mahapatra (1984) ArticleTitle‘Investor Reaction to Corporate Social Accounting’ Journal of Financial Economics 20 347–376

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Mahoney R. Roberts (2004) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Performance: Empirical Evidence on Canadian Firms’ Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 9 73–99

    Google Scholar 

  • J. McGuire S. Dow K. Argheyd (2003) ArticleTitle‘CEO Incentives and Corporate Social Performance’ Journal of Business Ethics 45 IssueID4 341–359

    Google Scholar 

  • T. McGuire A. Sundgren J. Schneeweis (1988) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’ Academy of Management Journal 31 IssueID4 854–872

    Google Scholar 

  • M. McKendall C. Sanchez P. Sicilian (1999) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Governance and Corporate Illegality: The Effects of Board Structure on Environmental Violations’ International Journal of Organizational Analysis 7 IssueID3 201–223

    Google Scholar 

  • A. McWilliams D. Siegel (2000) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?’ Strategic Management Journal 21 IssueID5 603–610

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Mehran (1995) ArticleTitle‘Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership and Firm Performance’ Journal of Financial Economics 38 163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Jantzi Research Associates Inc. (2003, http://www.mjrajsi.com/about.asp?section=1&level_2=0&level_3=0

  • C.K. Prahalad G. Hamel (1994) ArticleTitle‘Strategy as a Field of Study: Why Search for a New Paradigm?’ Strategic Management Journal 15 (Special Issue) IssueID5 5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Silverstein (1994) ArticleTitle‘Pension Funds Increase Presence in Boardrooms’ Pension World 30 IssueID5 4

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sloan (1993) ArticleTitle‘Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation’ Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 55–100

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Smith J. Zimmerman (1976) ArticleTitle‘Valuing Employee Stock Option Plans Using Option Pricing Models’ Journal of Accounting Research 14 357–364

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Swanson (1995) ArticleTitle‘Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the CSP Model’ Academy of Management Review 20 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Tosi L. Gomez-Mejia (1989) ArticleTitle‘The Decoupling of CEO Pay and Performance: An Agency Theory Perspective’ Administrative Science Quarterly 34 169–189

    Google Scholar 

  • D.B. Turban D.W. Greening (1997) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’ Academy of Management Journal 40 658–672

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations in Canada: 2002). ‘Stewardship and Conservation Discussion Paper’. http://www.canada2002earthsummit.gc.ca/en/stewardship_ conservation_e.cfm

  • M.V. Uzumeri (1997) ArticleTitle‘ISO 9000 and Other Metastandards: Principles for Management Practice’ Academy of Management Executives 11 IssueID1 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Waddock S.B. Graves (1997) ArticleTitle‘The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link’ Strategic Management Journal 18 IssueID4 303–319

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Waddock S.B. Graves (1997) ArticleTitle‘Social Issues in Management: Theory and Research in Corporate Social Performance’ Journal of Management 17 IssueID2 383–406

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Wartick P.E. Cochran (1985) ArticleTitle‘The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model’ Academy of Management Review 10 758–769

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Wood (1991) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’ Academy of Management Review 16 691–718

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Wood R.E. Jones (1995) ArticleTitle‘Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance’ International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3 IssueID3 250–279

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Zeckhauser J. Pound (1990) ‘Are Large Shareholders Effective Monitors? An Investigation of Share Ownership and Corporate Performance’ R. Hubbard (Eds) Asymmetric Information, Corporate Finance, and Investment University of Chicago Press Chicago 149–180

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. S. Mahoney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahoney, L.S., Thorne, L. Corporate Social Responsibility and Long-term Compensation: Evidence from Canada. J Bus Ethics 57, 241–253 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-5367-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-5367-z

Keywords

Navigation