Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Duration of tamoxifen use and the risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women with a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 face a lifetime risk of breast cancer of approximately 80 %. Tamoxifen treatment of the first cancer has been associated with a reduction in the risk of a subsequent contralateral cancer. We studied 1,504 women with a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, 411 women with bilateral breast cancer (cases) and 1,093 women with unilateral breast cancer (controls) in a matched case–control study. Control women were of similar age and had a similar age of diagnosis of first breast cancer as the cases. For each woman who used tamoxifen, the starting and stopping dates were abstracted and the duration of tamoxifen use was calculated. Three hundred and thirty-one women had used tamoxifen (22 %); of these 84 (25 %) had completed four or more years of tamoxifen, the remainder stopped prematurely or were current users. For women with up to 1 year of tamoxifen use, the odds ratio for contralateral breast cancer was 0.37 (95 % CI 0.20–0.69; p = 0.001) compared to women with no tamoxifen use. Among women with 1–4 years of tamoxifen use the odds ratio was 0.53 (95 % CI 0.32–0.87; p = 0.01). Among women with four or more years of tamoxifen use the odds ratio was 0.83 (95 % CI 0.44–1.55; p = 0.55). Short-term use of tamoxifen for chemoprevention in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers may be as effective as a conventional 5-year course of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M et al (1998) Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. Am J Hum Genet 62:676–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Metcalfe K, Gershman S, Lynch HT et al (2011) Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer 104:1384–1392

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Narod SA, Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group et al (2000) Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case–control study. Lancet 356:1876–1881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gronwald J, Tung N, Foulkes WD, Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group et al (2006) Tamoxifen and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers: an update. Int J Cancer 118:2281–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips K, Milne RL, Rookus MA et al (2013) Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 31:3091–3099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Narod SA (2010) Compliance with tamoxifen in women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 28:e698–e699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (2010) Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial: preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 3:696–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE et al (2011) Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 364:2381–2391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, et al (2013) Anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women (IBIS-II): an international, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet piiS0140-6736:62292-8

  10. Iqbal J, Ginsburg OM, Wijeratne TD et al (2011) Endometrial cancer and venous thromboembolism in women under age 50 who take tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 38:318–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Metcalfe KA, Snyder C, Seidel J, Hanna D, Lynch HT, Narod S (2005) The use of preventive measures among healthy women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Fam Cancer 4:97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371–1388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher B, Dignam J, Bryant J et al (1996) Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:1529–1542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E et al (2011) Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case–control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:744–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Foulkes WD, Metcalfe K, Sun P et al (2004) Estrogen receptor status in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancer: the influence of age, grade, and histological type. Clin Cancer Res 10:2029–2034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Narod SA (2011) Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8:669–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Euhus D, Bu D, Xian-Jin X et al (2001) Tamoxifen down-regulates Ets Oncogene family members ET4 and ET5 in benign breast tissue: implications for durable risk reduction. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 4(11):1852–1862

  18. Joshi PA, Jackson HW, Beristain AG et al (2010) Progesterone induces adult mammary stem cell expansion. Nature 465:803–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schramek D, Leibbrandt A, Sigl V et al (2010) Osteoclast differentiation factor RANKL controls development of progestin-driven mammary cancer. Nature 468:98–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Asselin-Labat ML, Vaillant F, Sheridan JM et al (2010) Control of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling. Nature 465:798–802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E et al (2011) Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case–control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:744–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weitzel JN, Robson M, Pasini B et al (2005) A comparison of bilateral breast cancers in BRCA carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:1534–1538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cuzick J, Forbes JF, Sestak I, International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I Investigators et al (2007) Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer-96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:272–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DeCensi A, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Gandini S et al (2011) Prognostic significance of Ki-67 labeling index after short-term presurgical tamoxifen in women with ER-positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol 22:582–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank study coordinators Adriana Valentini, Marcia Llacuachaqui, and Alejandra Ragone, as well as Jennifer Ng, Kristi De Buono, Kate Bisnaire, Dina Nikitina, Anneli Loo, Bita Khorram, Dina Gordon, Courtney May, Michelle Jones, Jose Miguel Lozano and Linda Steele who helped with the data collection and data entry. Supported by grants from the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Initiative and an ICARE grant IBG09-34198 awarded to T. Pal. SLN is the Morris and Horowitz Families Endowed Professor, and the work was supported by NIH R01 CA74415.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven A. Narod.

Additional information

Other members of the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group who contributed to the study: David Euhus, Judy Garber, Gad Rennert, Kevin Sweet, Ruth Gershoni-Baruch, Christine Rappaport, Edmond Lemire, Lovise Maehle, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Mary Daly, Sofia Merajver, Ava Kwong, Louise Bordeleau, Carey A. Cullinane, Eitan Friedman, Wendy McKinnon, Marie Wood, Daniel Rayson, Wendy Meschino, Jane McLennan, Josephine Wagner Costalas, Robert E. Reilly, Tuya Pal, Susan Vadaparampil, Kenneth Offit, Mark Robson, Noah Kauff, Jan Klijn, David Euhus, Claudine Isaacs, Fergus Couch, Cezary Cybulski, Tomasz Byrski, Ania Jakubowska, Seema Panchal, Sonia Nanda, Aletta Poll, Kelly Metcalfe, Barry Rosen, Susan Randall Armel, Albert Chudley, Gareth Evans, Joanne Blum, Beth Karlan, Dana Zakalik, John Lunn, Talia Donenberg, Barbara Pasini, Raluca N Kurz, Taya Fallen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gronwald, J., Robidoux, A., Kim-Sing, C. et al. Duration of tamoxifen use and the risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 146, 421–427 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3026-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3026-3

Keywords

Navigation