Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

XRCC3 5′-UTR and IVS5-14 polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Published data on the association between XRCC3 5′-UTR and IVS5-14 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between these polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for codominant model, dominant model, and recessive model, respectively. A total of four studies were involved in the meta-analysis with 6,303 cases and 6,563 controls for XRCC3 5′-UTR polymorphism and with 6,270 cases and 6,682 controls for XRCC3 IVS5-14 polymorphism. For XRCC3 5′-UTR A/G polymorphism, significantly elevated breast cancer risk was associated with variant genotype when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (AG vs. AA: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03–1.19; dominant model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.17). For XRCC3 IVS5-14 A/G polymorphism, significantly decreased breast cancer risk was associated with variant genotype (GG vs. AA: OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77–0.96). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the variant G allele of XRCC3 5′-UTR polymorphism is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer, while the variant G allele of XRCC3 IVS5-14 polymorphism has a protective effect on breast cancer development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer. N Engl J Med 343:78–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenneman MA, Weiss AE, Nickoloff JA, Chen DJ (2000) XRCC3 is required for efficient repair of chromosome breaks by homologous recombination. Mutat Res 459:89–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2006) Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1382–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee SA, Lee KM, Park SK, Choi JY, Kim B, Nam J, Yoo KY, Noh DY, Ahn SH, Kang D (2007) Genetic polymorphism of XRCC3 Thr241Met and breast cancer risk: case–control study in Korean women and meta-analysis of 12 studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 103:71–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Manuguerra M, Saletta F, Karagas MR, Berwick M, Veglia F, Vineis P, Matullo G (2006) XRCC3 and XPD/ERCC2 single nucleotide polymorphisms and the risk of cancer: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol 164:297–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Economopoulos KP, Sergentanis TN (2009) XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0562-3

  8. Han J, Hankinson SE, Ranu H, De Vivo I, Hunter DJ (2004) Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study. Carcinogenesis 25:189–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuschel B, Auranen A, McBride S, Novik KL, Antoniou A, Lipscombe JM, Day NE, Easton DF, Ponder BA, Pharoah PD (2002) Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility. Hum Mol Genet 11:1399–1407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Newcomb PA, Brinton LA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Chanock S, Welch R, Lissowska J, Peplonska B, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N (2006) Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of breast cancer: two population-based studies in USA and Poland, and meta-analyses. Hum Genet 119:376–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions and did not receive financial support or other form of compensation related to the development of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xi-Chun Hu.

Additional information

The first three authors contributed equally to this study and should be considered as co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qiu, LX., Mao, C., Yao, L. et al. XRCC3 5′-UTR and IVS5-14 polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122, 489–493 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0726-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0726-1

Keywords

Navigation