Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Influence of Marital Status on the Stage at Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival of Older Women with Breast Cancer

  • Report
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Research indicates an association between marital status and health but this link has not been thoroughly explored. Our goal was to examine the association of marital status on the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of older women with breast cancer and the potential role socioeconomic status, education level, and comorbidities may play in explaining these associations. Retrospective cohort study using linked Medicare and National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. The sample consisted of 32,268 women aged 65 years and older who received a diagnosis of breast cancer from 1991 to 1995. Information available through 1998 allowed for 3 years of follow-up. Results showed that unmarried women were more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer stage II–IV versus stage I and in situ (OR 1.17; CI95 1.12, 1.23). Unmarried women diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer were less likely to receive definitive therapy (OR 1.24; CI95 1.17, 1.31). Even after controlling for cancer stage and size at diagnosis and treatment received, unmarried women were at an increased risk of death from breast cancer (HR 1.25; CI95 1.14, 1.37). Socioeconomic variables and comorbidity had little impact on the relationship between marital status and survival. Older married women were at decreased risk for mortality after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Many of the health benefits enjoyed by married women are likely derived from increased social support and social networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W Farr (1958) ArticleTitleThe influence of marriage on the mortality of the French people Trans Natl Assoc Prom Soc Sci 504 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  2. CF Ortemeyer (1974) Variations in mortality, morbidity, and health care by marital status LL Erhardt JE Berlin (Eds) Mortality and Morbidity in the United States Harvard University Press Cambridge Mass 159–184

    Google Scholar 

  3. EE Kisker N Goldman (1987) ArticleTitlePerils of single life and benefits of marriage Soc Biol 34 135–152 Occurrence Handle3451361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Y Hu N Goldman (1990) ArticleTitleMortality differentials by marital status: an international comparison Demography 27 233–250 Occurrence Handle2332088

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. NJ Johnson E Backlund PD Sorlie CA Loveless (2000) ArticleTitleMarital status and mortality Ann Epidemiol 10 224–238 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1047-2797(99)00052-6 Occurrence Handle10854957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O Kravdal (2001) ArticleTitleThe impact of marital status on cancer survival Soc Sci Med 52 357–368 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00139-8 Occurrence Handle11330771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. JS Goodwin WC Hunt CR Key JM Samet (1987) ArticleTitleThe effect of marital status on stage, treatment and survival of cancer patients JAMA 258 3125–3130 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.258.21.3125 Occurrence Handle3669259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. FE Korbin GE Hendershot (1977) ArticleTitleDo family ties reduce mortality? Evidence from the United States, 1966–1968 J Marriage Fam 39 737–745

    Google Scholar 

  9. LA Lee CWA Panis (1996) ArticleTitleMarital status and mortality: the role of health Demography 33 313–327 Occurrence Handle8875065

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JR Bloom SL Stewart M Johnston et al. (2001) ArticleTitleSources of support and the physical and mental well-being of young women with breast cancer Soc Sci Med 53 1513–1524 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00440-8 Occurrence Handle11710426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. LF Berkman SL Syme (1979) ArticleTitleSocial networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda county residents Am J Epidemiol 109 186–204 Occurrence Handle425958

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LF Berkman (2000) ArticleTitleSocial support, social networks, social cohesion and health Soc Work Health Care 31 3–14 Occurrence Handle10.1300/J010v31n02_02 Occurrence Handle11081851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DG Blazer (1982) ArticleTitleSocial support and mortality in an elderly community population Am J Epidemiol 115 684–694 Occurrence Handle7081200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. C Schafer J Coyne R Lazarus (1981) ArticleTitleThe health related functions of social support J Behav Med 4 381–406 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00846149 Occurrence Handle7338894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ries LAG, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, et al. (eds): SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1994. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, NIH publication No. 97–2789, 1997

  16. National Cancer Institute: The SEER Program Code Manual, revised ed. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, NIH Publication No. 94-1999, 1994

  17. AL Potsky GF Riley JD Lubitz et al. (1993) ArticleTitlePotential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-Tumor Registry Database Med Care 31 732–748 Occurrence Handle8336512

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Health Care Financing Administration: Data User Reference Guide (DURG). Health Care Financing Administration, Baltimore, MD, January 2000

  19. XL Du JS Goodwin (2001a) ArticleTitlePatterns of chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women: findings from Medicare claims J Clin Oncol 19 1455–1461

    Google Scholar 

  20. XL Du JS Goodwin (2001b) ArticleTitleIncrease in chemotherapy use in older women with breast carcinoma from 1991 to 1996 Cancer 92 730–737 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4<730::AID-CNCR1376>3.0.CO;2-P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ME Charleson P Pompei KL Ales et al. (1987) ArticleTitleA new method of clarifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation J Chronic Dis 40 373–383 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 Occurrence Handle3558716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. PS Romano LL Roos JG Jollis (1993) ArticleTitleAdapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM Administrative Data: differing perspectives J Clin Epidemiol 46 1075–1079 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8 Occurrence Handle8410092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. ME Stokes Davis Cs GG Koch (1997) Categorical data analysis using the SAS system SAS Institute Inc. Cary NC

    Google Scholar 

  24. B Steinburg-Schone RM Weinick (1998) ArticleTitleHealth related behaviors and the benefits of marriage for elderly persons Gerontologist 38 618–627 Occurrence Handle9803650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. D. Umberson Gender (1992) ArticleTitleMarital status and the social control of health behavior Soc Sci Med 34 907–917 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0277-9536(92)90259-S Occurrence Handle1604380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. RA Silliman SL Troyan E Guadagnoli et al. (1997) ArticleTitleThe impact of age, marital status, and physician–patient interactions on the care of older women with breast carcinoma Cancer 80 1326–1334 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971001)80:7<1326::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO;2-8 Occurrence Handle9317187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. CD Sherbourne RD Hays (1990) ArticleTitleMarital status, social support, and health transitions in chronic disease patients J Health Soc Behav 3 328–343

    Google Scholar 

  28. KEE Schroder R Schwarzer NS Endler (1997) ArticleTitlePredicting cardiac patients quality of life from the characteristics of their spouses J␣Health Psychol 2 231–244

    Google Scholar 

  29. K Ell R Nishimoto L Mediansky J Mantell M Hamovitch (1992) ArticleTitleSocial relations, social support and survival among patients with cancer J Psychosomatic Res 36 531–541 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-3999(92)90038-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D Spiegel JR Bloom HC Kraemer E Gottheil (1989) ArticleTitleEffect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer Lancet 2 888–891 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91551-1 Occurrence Handle2571815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn V. Ostir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osborne, C., Ostir, G.V., Du, X. et al. The Influence of Marital Status on the Stage at Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival of Older Women with Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 93, 41–47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-3702-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-3702-4

Keywords

Navigation