Skip to main content
Log in

Maynard Smith, optimization, and evolution

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maynard Smith’s defenses of adaptationism and of the value of optimization theory in evolutionary biology are both criticized. His defense does not adequately respond to the criticism of adaptationism by Gould and Lewontin. It is also argued here that natural selection cannot be interpreted as an optimization process if the objective function to be optimized is either (i) interpretable as a fitness, or (ii) correlated with the mean population fitness. This result holds even if fitnesses are frequency-independent; the problem is further exacerbated in the frequency-dependent context modeled by evolutionary game theory. However, Eshel and Feldman’s new results on “long-term” evolution may provide some hope for the continuing relevance of the game-theoretic framework. These arguments also demonstrate the irrelevance of attempts by Intelligent Design creationists to use computational limits on optimization algorithms as evidence against evolutionary theory. It is pointed out that adaptation, natural selection, and optimization are not equivalent processes in the context of biological evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop D.T. and Cannings C. (1978). A generalized war of attrition. J. Theor. Biol. 70: 85–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behera N. (1996). Variational principles in evolution. Bull. Math. Biol. 58: 175–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crow J.F. and Kimura M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Minneapolis, Burgess

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R. (1996). Climbing Mount Improbable. London, Viking/Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong K. (1993). Genetic algorithms are NOT function optimizers. In: Whitley L.D., (eds). Foundations of Genetic Algorithms. San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembski W.A. (2002). No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham, MD, Rowman and Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshel I. and Feldman M.W. (2001). Optimality and evolutionary stability under short-term and long-term selection. In: Orzack S.H. and Sober E. (eds), Adaptationism and Optimality. Cambridge UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewens W.J.(1969). With additive fitness, the mean fitness increases. Nature 221: 1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewens W.J. (1989). An interpretation and proof of the fundamental theorem of natural selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 36: 167–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewens W.J. (1992). An optimizing principle of natural selection in evolutionary population genetics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 42: 333–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R.A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster M.R. 1999. Notice: No Free Lunches for Anyone, Bayesians Included. <http://www.no-free-lunch.org/Fors99.pdf>. Accessed: 14 February 2005

  • Godfrey-Smith P. (2001). Three kinds of adaptationism. In: Orzack S.H. and Sober E. (eds). Adaptationism and Optimality. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 335–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S.J. and Lewontin R.C. (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205: 581–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane J.B.S. (1928). Possible Worlds and Other Papers. New York, Harper

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland J. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin S. (1975). General two locus selection models: some objectives, rules and interpretations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7: 364–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lanczos C. (1959). The Variational Principles of Mechanics. Toronto, University of Toronto Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R.C. (1961). Evolution and the theory of games. J. Theor. Biol. 1: 383–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R.C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R.C.(1977). “Adaptation”. Encyclopedia Einaudi Turin 1: 198 –214

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R.C. (1978). Adaptation. Sci. Am. 239: 212–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R.C. (1979). Fitness, survival, and optimality. In: Horn D.J., Mitchell R. and Stairs G.R. (eds) Analysis of Ecological Systems. Columbus, Ohio State University Press, pp. 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R.C. (1991). Facts and the factitious in natural sciences. Crit. Inq. 18: 140–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1978). Optimization theory in evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. and Szathmáry E. (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. (1983). How to carry out the adaptationist program. Am. Nat. 121: 324–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michod R.E. (1999). Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran P.A.P. (1964). On the nonexistence of adaptive topographies. Ann. Hum. Genet. 27: 383–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G.A. and Maynard Smith J.(1990). Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348: 27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perakh M. 2003. The No Free Lunch Theorems and Their Applications to Evolutionary Algorithms. <http://www.nctimes.net/∼ ∼mark/bibl_science/orr_demb_NFL.htm>. Accessed: 13 February 2005.

  • Perakh M. (2004). Why there is a free lunch after all: William Dembski’s wrong answer to irrelevant questions. In: Young M. and Edis T. (eds) Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism. New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, pp. 153–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenette P.-Y. and Gerard J.-F. (1992). Does frequency-dependent selection optimize fitness?. J. Theor. Biol. 159: 381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve H.K. and Sherman P.W. 1999. Adaptations: Meanings. In: Nature Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. John Wiley, Chichester. http://www.els.net/ [doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001707].

  • Scheuer P.A.G. and Mandel S.P.H. (1959). An inequality in population genetics. Heredity 31: 519–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Svirezhev Y.M. (1972). Optimum principles in population genetics. In: Ratner V.A. (ed) Studies on Theoretical Genetics. Novosibirsk, USSR Academy of Science, pp. 86–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahshahani S. 1979. A new mathematical framework for the study of linkage and selection. Memoirs Am. Math. Soc. 17: 211

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert D.H. and Macready W.G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 1: 67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S. (1932). The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. In: Jones D.F., (ed), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics. I. Monisha, WI, Brooklyn Botanic Garden, pp. 356–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S. (1967). Surfaces’ of selective value. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 58: 165–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeeman E.C. (1981). Dynamics of the evolution of animal conflicts. J. Theor. Biol. 89: 249–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahotra Sarkar.

Additional information

It is a pleasure to dedicate this paper to the memory of John Maynard Smith. Thanks are due to James Justus and Samir Okasha for comments on an earlier draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarkar, S. Maynard Smith, optimization, and evolution. Biol Philos 20, 951–966 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9017-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9017-3

Keywords

Navigation