Skip to main content
Log in

Grazing-induced production of DMS can stabilize food-web dynamics and promote the formation of phytoplankton blooms in a multitrophic plankton model

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volatile infochemicals including climatically relevant dimethylsulphide (DMS) have been suggested to play important roles in the structuring and functioning of marine food webs. Experimenting with complex natural plankton communities or several trophic levels in laboratory microcosms is challenging and, as a result, empirical data confirming the role of DMS in trophic interactions is lacking. Models are a suitable tool to provide insight into such complex interactions. Here we consider a model of the interactions between three trophic levels of plankton: phytoplankton, grazing microzooplankton and predatory mesozooplankton. We show that the inclusion of a grazing-induced DMS production term has a stabilizing effect on the system dynamics under the assumption that DMS acts as an info-chemical and increases the rate of mesozooplankton predation on grazing microzooplankton. We further demonstrate how this feedback between trophic levels can potentially lead to the formation of a phytoplankton bloom. The model provides a suitable framework for further study into the possible role of DMS in the ecology of marine food webs beyond its recognised role as a climate-cooling gas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Abrams PA, Walters CJ (1996) Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment. Ecology 77:1125–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer SD, Stelfox-Widdicombe CE, Burkill PH, Malin G (2001) A dilution approach to quantify the production of dissolved dimethylsulphoniopropionate and dimethylsulphide due to microzooplankton herbivory. Aquat Microb Ecol 23:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer SD, Smith GC, Nightingale PD, Widdicombe CE, Tarran GA, Rees AP, Burkill PH (2002) Dynamics of particulate dimethylsulphoniopropionate during a Lagrangian experiment in the northern North Sea. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr 49:2979–3000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers GP, Cainey JM (2007) The CLAW hypothesis: a review of the major developments. Environ Chem 4:366–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buskey EJ (1984) Swimming pattern as an indicator of the roles of copepod sensory systems in the recognition of food. Mar Biol 79:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calbet A (2001) Mesozooplankton grazing effect on primary production: a global comparative analysis in marine ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1824–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlson RJ, Lovelock JE, Andreae MO, Warren SG (1987) Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature 326:655–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles TJ, Desiderio RA, Carr ME (1998) Small scale planktonic structure: persistence and trophic consequences. J Oceanogr 11:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AM, Brindley J (1999) Zooplankton mortality and the dynamical behavior of plankton population models. Bull Math Biol 61:303–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA, Batchelder HP, Powell TM (2000) Modeling microzooplankton dynamics within a coastal upwelling system. J Plankton Res 22:1619–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fileman E, Smith T, Harris R (2007) Grazing by Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on phytoplankton and protozooplankton during the spring bloom in the Celtic Sea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 348:70–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fileman E, Petropavlovsky A, Harris R (2010) Grazing by the copepods Calanus helgolandicus and Acartia clausi on the protozooplankton community at station L4 in the Western English Channel. J Plankton Res 32:709–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks PJS (2001) Phytoplankton blooms in a fluctuating environment: the roles of plankton response time scales and grazing. J Plankton Res 23:1433–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genkai-Kato M, Yamamura N (1999) Unpalatable prey resolves the paradox of enrichment. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1215–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill CW, Poulet SA (1988) Responses of copepods to dissolved free amino-acids. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 43:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat 94:421–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer AC, Pitchford JW (2005) The role of mixotrophy in plankton bloom dynamics, and the consequences for productivity. ICES L Mar Sci 62:833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer AC, Pitchford JW (2006) Mixotrophy, allelopathy and the population dynamics of phagotrophic algae (cryptophytes) in the Darss Zingst Bodden estuary, southern Baltic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 328:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen B, Tande KS, Berggreen UC (1990) On the trophic fate of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot). III. Functional responses in grazing demonstrated on juvenile stages of Calanus finmarchicus (Copepoda) fed diatoms and Phaeocystis. J Plankton Res 12:1173–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen FC, Reckermann M, Klein Breteler WCM, Riegman R (1993) Phaeocystis blooming enhanced by copepod predation on protozoa: evidence from incubation experiments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 102:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME (2009) Marine chemical ecology: chemical signals and cues structure marine populations, communities, and ecosystems. Annu Rev Mar Sci 1:193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert DW, Roulet N, Moore T (2000) Modelling and analysis of peatlands as dynamical systems. J Ecol 88:230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1959) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation on the European pine sawfly. Can Entomol 91:293–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irigoien X, Flynn KJ, Harris RP (2005) Plankton blooms: a ‘loophole’ in microzooplankton grazing impact? J Plankton Res 27:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James A, Pitchford JW, Brindley J (2003) The relationship between plankton blooms, the hatching of fish larvae, and recruitment. Ecol Model 160:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein Breteler WCM, Schogt N, Baas M, Schouten S, Kraay GW (1999) Trophic upgrading of food quality by protozoans enhancing copepod growth: role of essential lipids. Mar Biol 135:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kot M (2001) Elements of mathematical ecolgy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalewsky S, Dambach M, Mauck B, Dehnhardt G (2006) High olfactory sensitivity for dimethyl sulphide in harbour seals. Biol Lett 2:106–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levasseur M, Michaud S, Egge J, Cantin G, Nejstgaard JC, Sanders R, Fernandez E, Solberg PT, Heimdal B, Gosselin M (1996) Production of DMSP and DMS during a mesocosm study of an Emiliania huxleyi bloom: influence of bacteria and Calanus finmarchicus grazing. Mar Biol 126:609–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann K, Hastings A (1997) Re-evaluating the omnivory–stability relationship in food webs. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1249–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melle W, Skjoldal HR (1998) Reproduction and development of Calanus finmarchicus, C. glacialis and C. hyperboreus in the Barents Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 169:211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov AY, Petrovskii SV, Nezlin NP (2007) Towards resolving the paradox of enrichment: the impact of zooplankton vertical migrations on plankton systems stability. J Theor Biol 248:501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov A, Arashkevich E, Nikishina A, Solovyev K (2011) Nutrient-rich plankton communities stabilized via predator–prey interactions: revisiting the role of vertical heterogeneity. Math Med Biol 28:185–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejstgaard JC, Båmstedt U, Bagøien E, Solberg PT (1995) Algal constraints on copepod grazing growth state, toxicity, cell size, and season as regulating factors. ICES J Mar Sci 52:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejstgaard JC, Gismervik I, Solberg PT (1997) Feeding and reproduction by Calanus finmarchicus, and microzooplankton grazing during mesocosm blooms of diatoms and the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 147:197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevitt GA (2000) Olfactory foraging by Antarctic procellariiform seabirds: life at high Reynolds numbers. Biol Bull 198:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevitt GA, Veit RR, Kareiva P (1995) Dimethyl sulphide as a foraging cue for Antarctic Procellariiform seabirds. Nature 376:680–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitchford J, Brindley J (1998) Intratrophic predation in simple predator–prey models. Bull Math Biol 60:937–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohnert G, Steinke M, Tollrian R (2007) Chemical cues, defence metabolites and the shaping of pelagic interspecific interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:198–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1971) Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171:385–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML, MacArthur RH (1963) Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator–prey interactions. Am Nat 97:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiz E, Calbet A (2007) Scaling of feeding in marine calanoid copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 52:668–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherr E, Sherr B (1988) Role of microbes in pelagic food webs. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1225–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke M, Malin G, Liss PS (2002a) Trophic interactions in the sea: an ecological role for climate relevant volatiles. J Phycol 38:630–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke M, Malin G, Archer SD, Burkill PH, Liss PS (2002b) DMS production in a coccolithophorid bloom: evidence for the importance of dinoflagellate DMSP lyases. Aquat Microb Ecol 26:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke M, Stefels J, Stamhuis E (2006) Dimethyl sulphide triggers search behaviour in copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 51:1925–1930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang KW, Jakobsen HH, Visser AW (2001) Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae) and the planktonic food web: feeding, growth, and trophic interactions among grazers. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1860–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truscott JE, Brindley J (1994) Ocean plankton populations as excitable media. Bull Math Biol 56:981–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos M, Kooi BW, DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM (2004) Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment. OIKOS 105:471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos M, Vet LEM, Wackers FL, Middelburg JJ, van der Putten WH, Mooij WM, Heip CHR, van Donk E (2006) Infochemicals structure marine, terrestrial and freshwater food webs: implications for ecological informatics. Ecol Inform 1:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe GV, Steinke M (1996) Grazing-activated production of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) by two clones of Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol Oceanogr 41:1151–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang EJ, Kang HK, Yoo S, Hyun JH (2009) Contribution of auto- and heterotrophic protozoa to the diet of copepods in the Ulleung Basin, East Sea/Japan Sea. J Plankton Res 32:647–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was funded by a grant from NERC (NE/H009485/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward A. Codling.

Appendix

Appendix

Here we show the derivation of Eqs. 12 and parameters m and λ. We start with a full model with phytoplankton (P), microzooplankton (M), copepods (Z, which we assume is constant due to the fact that we only consider a short time-scale of a few days) and DMS (C) are:

$$ \frac{dP}{dt} = r(P)P - f(P)M $$
(3)
$$ \frac{dM}{dt} = \gamma f(P)M - \mu M - \beta ZM(1 + \xi C) $$
(4)
$$ \frac{dC}{dt} = \eta f(P)M - \nu C $$
(5)

where

$$ r(P) = r\left( {1 - \frac{P}{K}} \right) $$
$$ f(P) = \frac{aP}{1 + bP} $$

and

  • μ is the background mortality of microzooplankton as described in the Methods section of the main text.

  • β and ξ correspond to copepod predation; copepods consume microzooplankton at a linear rate β in the absence of DMS (a linear rate is chosen for simplicity because a type II response leads to similar model results). In the presence of DMS, the overall predation rate is increased by a multiplicative factor of 1 + ξC, where the parameter ξ represents how much an increase in levels of DMS leads to an increase in predation by copepods.

  • DMS is produced in the system at a rate η proportional to microzooplankton grazing and leaves the system at a rate ν (as a result of flux to the atmosphere, bacterial consumption etc.).

C is a fast variable under assumption (ii) from the methods; C will quickly return to the underlying background concentration after any perturbation and hence we assume that dC/dt ≈ 0. Rearranging Eq. 5 for C under this assumption and substituting back into Eq. 4 gives the following system:

$$ \frac{dP}{dt} = r(P)P - f(P)M $$
(6)
$$ \frac{dM}{dt} = \gamma f(P)M - mM - \lambda f(P)M^{2} $$
(7)

where \( m = (\mu + \beta Z) \) and \( \lambda = \frac{\eta \beta Z\xi }{\nu }. \)

Specifying that phytoplankton grow logistically, r(P), and that microzooplankton follow a type II functional response, f(P), gives Eqs. 12 in the main text.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, N.D., Breckels, M.N., Archer, S.D. et al. Grazing-induced production of DMS can stabilize food-web dynamics and promote the formation of phytoplankton blooms in a multitrophic plankton model. Biogeochemistry 110, 303–313 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9649-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9649-0

Keywords

Navigation