Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sulfate deposition and temperature controls on methane emission and sulfur forms in peat

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural wetlands are the single most important contributors of methane (CH4) to the atmosphere. Recent research has shown that the deposition of sulfate (SO 2-4 ) can substantially reduce the emission of this radiatively important gas from wetlands. However, the influence of temperature in regulating the extent of this effect is unclear. Peatlands also constitute an important store of sulfur (S), so understanding the effect of S deposition on S dynamics within this store is important if we are to understand the interaction. The effect of enhanced SO 2-4 deposition on CH4 fluxes and S pools were investigated in peatland monoliths under controlled environment conditions. This enabled a close examination of effects at the onset of experimentally enhanced SO 2-4 deposition while examining temperature effects on the interaction. Experimentally enhanced S deposition at rates as small as 15 kg SO 2-4 -S ha−1 year−1 suppressed CH4 emissions by 30%. There was no increased suppression at larger deposition rates of simulated acid rain. Temperature affected the suppressive effect of the simulated acid rain. At low temperatures (down to 5 °C), there was a greater proportional suppression than at higher temperatures (up to 20 °C). Evidence suggests that populations of SO 2-4 -reducing bacteria do not respond, as previously thought, to enhanced SO 2-4 supply with a 'boom' followed by a 'bust' and less recalcitrant S pools (SO 2-4 and S°) were depleted in the SO 2-4 -treated peat, indicating enhanced S turnover. A significant proportion of the SO 2-4 from the treatment was taken up and stored as SO 2-4 in vascular plants, placing this mechanism as a potentially important seasonal regulator of peatland SO 2-4 availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arah J.R.M. and Stephen K.D. 1998. A model of the processes leading to methane emission from peatland. Atmos. Environ. 32(19): 3257-3264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell C.I., Clarkson D.T. and Cram W.J. 1995. Sulfate supply and its regulation of transport in roots of a tropical legume Macroptilium atropurpureum cv. siratro. J. Exp. Bot. 46(282): 65-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodegom P.M. van and Stams A.J.M. 1999. Effects of alternate electron acceptors and temperature on methanogenesis in rice soils. Chemosphere 39(1): 167-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S.J. 2001. Sulfur forms in open and afforested areas of two Scottish peatlands. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1-2): 23-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dise N.B. and Verry E.S. 2001. Suppression of peatland methane emission by cumulative sulfate de-position in simulated acid rain. Biogeochemistry 53(2): 143-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald D.R. 1994. The diagnosis of S status in soils and crops. M. Phil. Thesis, University of Aberdeen, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler D., MacDonald J., Leith I.D., Hargreaves K.J. and Martynoga R. 1995. The response of peat wetland methane emissions to temperature, water table and sulphate deposition. In: Heij G.J. and Erisman J.W. (eds) Acid Rain Research: Do We Have Enough Answers? Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 485-487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C., Hudson J., Lock M.A., Reynolds B. and Swanson C. 1994. A possible role of sulphate in the suppression of wetland methane fluxes following drought. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26: 1439-1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freney J.R., Jacq V.A. and Balensperger J.F. 1982. The significance of the biological sulfur cycle in rice production. In: Dommergues Y.R. and Diem H.G. (eds) Microbiology of Tropical Soils and Plant Productivity. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauci V., Dise N.B. and Fowler D. 2002. Controls on suppression of methane flux from a peat bog subjected to simulated acid rain sulfate deposition. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 16(1): 10.1029/ 2000GB001370.

  • Gede I., Aiputra K. and Anderson 1992. Distribution and redistribution of sulphur taken up from nutrient solution during vegetative growth in barley. Physiol. Plant. 85: 453-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg G., Sundh I. and Svensson B.H. et al. 2001. Effects of temperature, and nitrogen and sulfur deposition, on methane emission from a boreal mire. Ecology 82(7): 1982-1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J., Sato M., Ruedy R., Lacis A. and Oinas V. 2000. Global warming in the twenty-first century: An alternative scenario. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97(18): 9875-9880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines M.E., Evans R.S., Genthner B.R.S., Willis S.G., Friedman S., Rooney-Varga J.N. and Devereux R. 1999. Molecular phylogenetic and biogeochemical studies of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the rhizo-sphere of Spartina alterniflora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65(5): 2209-2216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C.M. and Nishita H. 1952. Microestimation of sulfur in plant materials, soils, and irrigation waters. Anal. Chem. 24: 736-742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J., Verma S.B. and Billesbach D.P. 1999. Seasonal variation in methane emission from a temperate Phragmites-dominated marsh: effect of growth stage and plant-mediated transport. Global Change Biol. 5(4): 433-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • King J.Y., Reeburgh W.S. and Regli S.K. 1998. Methane emission and transport by arctic sedges in Alaska: Results of a vegetation removal experiment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 103(D22): 29083-29092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y., Wassmann R., Neue H.U. and Huang C. 1999. Impact of phosphorus supply on root exudation, aerenchyma formation and methane emission of rice plants. Biogeochemistry 47(2): 203-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald J.A. 1997. Methane oxidation in temperate and tropical soils. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald J.A., Fowler D., Hargreaves K.J., Skiba U., Leith I.D. and Murray M.B. 1998. Methane emission rates from a northern wetland; Response to temperature, water table and transport Atmos. Environ. 32(19): 3219-3227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedwell D.B. and Watson A. 1995. CH4 production, oxidation and emission in a UK ombrotrophic peat bog: influence of SO 2 4 from acid rain. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27: 893-903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit S.P. and Breitenbeck G.A. 1992. A laboratory study of factors influencing methane uptake by soils. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 41(1): 39-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neue H.U., Wassmann R., Lantin R.S., Alberto M.A.C.R., Aduna J.B. and Javellana A.M. 1996. Factors affecting methane emission from rice fields. Atmos. Environ. 30(10-11): 1751-1754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve A.S., Siegel D.I. and Glaser P.H. 1996. Geochemical controls on peatland pore water from the Hudson Bay Lowland: a multivariate statistical approach. J. Hydrol. 181(1-4): 285-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmankova E. and Post R.A. 1996. Methane in sulfate-rich and sulfate-poor wetland sediments. Bio-geochemistry 34: 57-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimel J.P. 1995. Plant-transport and methane production as controls on methane flux from arctic wet meadow tundra. Biogeochemistry 28(3): 183-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S., Kashyap A.K. and Singh J.S. 1998. Methane flux in relation to growth and phenology of a high yielding rice variety as affected by fertilization. Plant Soil 201(1): 157-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson A. and Nedwell D.B. 1998. Methane production and emission from peat: the influence of anions (sulphate, nitrate) from acid rain. Atmos. Environ. 32: 3239-3245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder R.K. and Lang G.E. 1988. cycling of inorganic and organic sulfur in peat from big run bog, West-Virginia. Biogeochemistry 5(2): 221-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder R.K., Lang G.E. and Granus V.A. 1985. An evaluation of wet chemical methods for quantifying sulfur fractions in fresh-water wetland peat. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30, 1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder R.K., Yavitt J.B. and Lang G.E. 1990. Methane Production and Sulfate Reduction in 2 Appa-lachian Peatlands. Biogeochemistry 10(2): 81-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhabina N.N. and Volcov I.I. 1978. 'A method of determination of various sulfur compounds in sea sediments and rock'. In: Krumbein W.E. (ed) Environmental Biogeochemistry and Geomicrobiology. Methods, Metals and Assessment. Vol. 3, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, pp. 735-746.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauci, V., Fowler, D., Chapman, S.J. et al. Sulfate deposition and temperature controls on methane emission and sulfur forms in peat. Biogeochemistry 71, 141–162 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-9681-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-9681-4

Navigation