Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Countryside Stewardship Scheme and Butterflies: A Study of Plant and Butterfly Species Richness

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Butterfly and plant species richness were recorded from 1997 to 2000 on 2 and 6 m grass margins created at three farms in Essex which had entered the Countryside Stewardship Scheme (CSS) in October 1996. On both the 2 and 6 m margins there was a significant relationship between the length of hedgerow and the number of plant species observed on the margins, but the seed mixtures used may not have been ideal and natural regeneration should not have been used on the clay soils of Essex. Butterfly species richness was significantly greater on the 2 m margins than on the control sections, and was greater when a higher number of grass species were included in the original seed mixture. Plant species richness was greater on the 6 m margins when established by natural regeneration. CSS grass margins could be improved as butterfly habitats if they are linked to existing habitats such as hedgerows, are sown with a better range of native grasses and herbs and are managed in a way more conducive to wildlife. These changes to the policy of establishment of CSS margins could help combat habitat loss and fragmentation within the countryside.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Asher M. Warren R. Fox P. Harding G. Jeffcoate S. Jeffcoate (2001) The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker A.M. and Reynolds C.J. 1999. The value of planted grass field margins as a habitat for sawflies and other chick-food insects. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne pp.109 – 116.

  • J. Bullock (1996) Plants W.J. Sutherland (Eds) Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook Cambridge University Press Cambridge 111–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys J.C. 1995. Kansen voor natuur bij braakegging van perceelranden. Akkerranden in Nederland, In: de Snoo G.R., Rotteveel A.J.W. and Heemsbergen H. (eds), Wageningen, pp. 43–51.

  • Buys J.C., Oosterveld E.B. and Ellenbroek F.M. 1996. Kansen voor natuur bij braak II verslag van een tweejarig praktijkonderzoek. (No CLM 253 – 1996). Centrum voor Landbouw en Milieu.

  • N.L. Carreck I.H. Williams J.N. Oakley (1999) Enhancing farmland for insect pollinators using flower mixtures In Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy Association of Applied Biologists Wellesbourne 101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • D.W. Cowling D.R. Lockyer (1968) ArticleTitleA comparison of the yield of three grass species at various levels of nitrogenous fertiliser grown alone or in a mixture Journal of Agricultural Science 71 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • G.R. Snoo Particlede H.A. Udo Haes Particlede (1994) ArticleTitleOnbespoten akkerranden voor natuur, milieu en bedrijf Landschap 11 IssueID4 17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Dover (1994) Arable Field Margins: factors affecting butterfly distribution and abundance N. Boatman (Eds) BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating agriculture and conservation British Crop Protection Council Warwick 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Dover (1999) Butterflies and field margins Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy Association of Applied Biologists Wellesbourne 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • O.J. Dunn (1964) ArticleTitleMultiple comparisons using rank sums Technometrics 6 241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameEnglish Nature (1995) Rebuilding the English Countryside English Nature Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Feber H. Smith (1995) Butterfly conservation on arable farmland A.S. Pullen (Eds) Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies Chapman and Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Feber H. Smith D.W. Macdonald (1994) The effects of field margin restoration on the Meadow Brown butterfly (Maniola jurtina) N. Boatman (Eds) BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating agriculture and conservation British Crop Protection Council Warwick 295–300

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Feber H. Smith D.W. MacDonald (1996) ArticleTitleThe effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields Journal of Applied Ecology 33 1191–1205

    Google Scholar 

  • R.G. Field (2002) A study of butterflies on Farmland University of Essex Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins A. and Feber R.E. 1997. Management for plant and butterfly species diversity on organically farmed grassland field margins. In Management for grassland diversity. Proceedings of International. Symposium of the European Grassland Federation, pp.69 – 73.

  • Kirkham F.W., Sherwood A.J., Oakley J.N. and Fielder A.G. 1999. Botanical composition and invertebrate populations in sown grass and wildflower margins. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54, Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and PolicyAssociation of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp.291 – 298.

  • J.O. Luken (1990) Directing Ecological Succession Chapman and Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameMAFF (1999) The Countryside Stewardship Scheme: Information and how to apply MAFF London

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameMAFF (2000) Agricultural Statistics in Great Britain in 1999 MAFF London

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J.P Marshall (1998) Guidelines for the siting, establishment and management of arable field margins, beetle banks, cereal conservation headlands and wildlife seed mixtures IACR Long Ashton

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P., Baudry J., Moonen C., Fevre E. and Thomas C.F.G. 1996. Factors affecting the floral diversity in European field margins networks. In: Simpson I. and Dennis P. (eds), The Spatial Dynamics of Biodiversity Proceedings 5th Annual IALE (UK) Conference. IALEUK, pp. 97–104.

  • E.J.P. Marshall C. Moonen (1998) A Review of Field Margin Conservation Strips in Europe IACR Long Ashton

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J.P. Marshall M. Nowakowski (1995) Successional changes in the flora of a sown field margin strip managed by cutting and herbicide application Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Weeds, BCPC Farnham 973–978

    Google Scholar 

  • D.D. Murphy A.E. Launer P.R. Ehrlich (1983) ArticleTitleThe role of adult feeding in egg production and population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha) Oecologica 56 257–263

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Pollard (1977) ArticleTitleA method for assessing the abundance of butterflies Biological Conservation 12 115–134 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(77)90065-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Pollard T. Yates (1993) Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation Chapman and Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Smith R.E. Feber P.J. Johnson K. McCallum S.P. Jensen M. Younes D.W. MacDonald (1993) The Conservation Management of Arable Field Margins English Nature Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Smith R.E. Feber D.W. MacDonald (1994) The role of wildflower seed mixtures in field margin restoration N. Boatman (Eds) BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating agriculture and conservation British Crop Protection Council Warwick 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Smith R.E. Feber D.W. MacDonald (1999) Sown field margins: why stop at grass? In: Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones Ecology, Management and Policy Association of Applied Biologists Wellesbourne 291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Smith K. McCallum D.W. MacDonald (1997) ArticleTitleExperimental comparison of the nature conservation valueproductivity and ease of management of a conventional and a more species-rich grass ley Journal of Applied Ecology 34 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • C.R.W. Spedding E.W. Diekmahns (1972) Grasses and Legumes in British Agriculture Bulletin of the Commonwealth Bureau of Pasture and Field Crops No. 49. Royal Commonwealth Agriculture Bureau Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J.A. 1984. The Conservation of Butterflies in Temperate Countries: Past efforts and lessons for the future. In: The Biology of Butterflies. Sypm. of the Royal Entomological Society of London 11: 333 – 353.

  • M.S. Warren (1992) Butterfly populations R.L.H. Dennis (Eds) The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain Oxford University Press Oxford 73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • W.B. Watt P.C. Hoch S.G. Mills (1974) ArticleTitleNectar resource use by Colias butterflies Oecologia 14 353–374 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00384578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West T.M. and Marshall E.J.P. 1996. Managing sown flower margin strips on contrasted soil types in three Environmentally Sensitive Areas. In Aspects of Applied Biology, 44, Vegetation Management in Forestry, Amenity and Conservation Areas. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp. 269 – 276.

  • West T.M., Marshall E.J.P, Westbury D.B. and Arnold G.M. 1999. Vegetation development on sown and unsown field boundary strips established in three Environmentally Sensitive Areas. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp. 235 – 240.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Environment and Rural Affairs, Writtle College, Writtle, Chelmsford, Essex

    R. G. Field & T. Gardiner

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, Essex

    C. F. Mason

  3. Department of Science, Writtle College, Writtle, Chelmsford, CM1 3RR, Essex

    J. Hill

  4. R.G. Field, 166 Sherwood Avenue, Northampton, NN2 8TE, 01604–844927, UK

    R. G. Field

Authors
  1. R. G. Field
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Gardiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. F. Mason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. G. Field.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Field, R.G., Gardiner, T., Mason, C.F. et al. Countryside Stewardship Scheme and Butterflies: A Study of Plant and Butterfly Species Richness. Biodivers Conserv 15, 443–452 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6320-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6320-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation