Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

What does biodiversity actually do? A review for managers and policy makers

  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conservation managers and policy makers must often justify the need for protection of biodiversity. However, results of scientific studies testing for a positive value of biodiversity in terms of community stability and ecosystem function have been complex and inconsistent. We review recent information on the consequences of loss of biodiversity for natural systems. The relationships described vary with scale of interest – for instance, biodiversity at local scales typically has strong effects on ecosystem function, although the opposite relationship is often found at regional scales. These inconsistencies lead to some concern as to whether these relationships can be used to justify biodiversity protection. This is particularly relevant to policy, where holistic protection of biodiversity has most often been mooted and justified. For managers, who most often work to protect single species, communities or ecosystem functions, biodiversity research has failed to address questions of critical concern such as consequences of the loss of rare species or the identification of functional keystone species. For the general public, we believe that the confusion and debate surrounding biodiversity and ecosystem function relationships is in danger of eroding the positive value society places on biodiversity. We further warn that using those relationships in policy documents as justifications for biodiversity protection is fraught with difficulties. Finally, we contend that biodiversity research has largely not addressed issues of concern to conservation managers, and list a set of priorities for relevant research on the consequences of biodiversity loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison G.W. (2004). The influence of diversity and stress intensity on community resistance and resilience. Ecol. Monogr. 74: 117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altieri M.A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asner G.P. and Beatty S.W. (1996). Effects of an African grass invasion on Hawaiian shrubland nitrogen biogeochemistry. Plant Soil 186: 205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Belden and Russonello 1996. Human values and nature's future: Americans attitudes on biological diversity, Washington DC.

  5. Beldon R. and Stewart 2002. Americans and biodiversity: new perspectives in 2002, Washington DC.

  6. Berlow E.L. (1999). Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature 398: 300–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolam S.G., Fernandes T.F. and Huxham M. (2002). Diversity, biomass, and ecosystem processes in the marine benthos. Ecol. Monogr. 72: 599–615

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bond E.M. and Chase J. (2002). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at local and regional spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 5: 467–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borrvall C., Ebenman B. and Jonsson T. (2000). Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs. Ecol. Lett. 3: 131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bowen B.W. (1999). Preserving genes, species, or ecosystems? Healing the fractured foundations of conservation policy. Mol. Ecol. 8: s5–s10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bullock J.M., Pywell R.F., Burke M.J.W. and Walker K.J. (2001). Restoration of biodiversity enhances agricultural production. Ecol. Lett. 4: 185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Caldeira M.C., Ryel R.J., Lawton J.H. and Pereira J.S. (2001). Mechanisms of positive biodiversity–production relationships: insights provided by δ13C analysis in experimental Mediterranean grassland plots. Ecol. Lett. 4: 439–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell B.M., Jeffrey S., Kozanayi W., Luckert M., Mutamba M. and Zindi C. (2002). Household livelihoods in semi-arid regions: options and constraints. Centre for International Forestry Research, BogorIndonesia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cardinale B.J., Palmer M.A. and Collins S.C. (2002). Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature 415: 426–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Crawley M.J., Brown S.L., Heard M.S. and Edwards G.R. (1999). Invasion resistance in experimental grassland communities: species richness or species identity?. Ecol. Lett. 2: 140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Convention on Biological Diversity. 1992. United Nations Environmental Program.

  17. Dirzo R. and Raven P.H. (2003). Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28: 137–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Doak D.F., Bigger D., Harding E.K., Marvier M.A., O'Malley R.E. and Thomson D. (1998). The statistical inevitability of stability–diversity relationships in community ecology. Am. Nat. 151: 264–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Downing A.L. and Leibold M. (2002). Ecosystem consequences of species richness and composition in pond food webs. Nature 416: 837–841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Duffy J.E., Macdonald K.S., Rhode J.M. and Parker J.D. (2001). Grazer diversity, functional redundancy, and productivity in seagrass beds: an experimental test. Ecology 82: 2417–2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dukes J.S. (2001). Biodiversity and invasibility in grassland microcosms. Oecologia 126: 563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dukes J.S. (2002). Species composition and diversity affect grassland susceptibility and response to invasion. Ecol. Appl. 12: 602–617

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ehrlich P.R. and Ehrlich A.H. (1981). Extinctions: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. Ballantine, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. El Serafy S. (1998). Pricing the unpriceable. Ecol. Econ. 25: 25–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Elton C.S. (1958). The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Emmerson M.C., Solan M., Emes C., Paterson D.M. and Raffaelli D. (2001). Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems. Nature 411: 73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Engelhardt K.A.M. and Ritchie M.E. (2001). Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services. Nature 411: 687–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Environment Canada. (2003). Species at Risk Act. Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  29. Figge F. (2004). Bio-folio: applying portfolio theory to biodiversity. Biodiv. Conserv. 13: 827–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Finke D.L. and Denno R.F. (2004). Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429: 407–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fonseca C.R. and Ganade G. (2001). Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J. Ecol. 89: 118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fricke H. (2001). Coelacanths: a human responsibility. J. Fish Biol. 59: 332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fukami T. and Morin P.J. (2003). Productivity–biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly. Nature 424: 423–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Griffiths B.S., Ritz K., Bardgett R.D., Cook R., Christensen S., Ekelund F., Sørensen S.J., Bååth E., Bloem J., de Ruiter P.C., Dolfing J. and Nicolardot B. (2000). Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 90: 279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hall R., Tank J.L. and Dybdahl M.F. (2003). Exotic snails dominate nitrogen and carbon cycling in a highly productive stream. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1: 407–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heemsbergen D.A., Berg M.P., Loreau M., van Hal J.R., Faber J.H. and Verhoef H.A. (2004). Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity science. Science 306: 1019–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hilborn R., Quinn T.P., Schindler D.E. and Rogers D.E. (2003). Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 6564–6568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hooper D.U. and Dukes J.S. (2004). Overyielding among plant functional groups in a long-term experiment. Ecol. Lett. 7: 95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hooper D.U. and Vitousek P.M. (1998). Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol. Monogr. 68: 121–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hooper D.U., Ewel J.J., Hector A., Inchausti P., Lavorel S., Lawton J.H., Lodge D.M., Loreau M., Naeem S., Schmid B., Setala H., Symstad A.J., Vandermeer J., Wardle D.A. and Chapin F.S. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monog. 75: 3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hughes J.B. and Roughgarden J. (2000). Species diversity and biomass stability. Am. Nat. 155: 618–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ives A.R., Gross K. and Klug J.L. (1999). Stability and variability in competitive communities. Science 286: 542–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ives A.R., Klug J.L. and Gross K. (2000). Stability and species richness in complex communities. Ecol. Lett. 3: 399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jonsson M. and Malmqvist B. (2000). Ecosystem process rate increases with animal species richness: evidence from leaf-eating, aquatic insects. Oikos 89: 519–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jonsson M., Malmqvist B. and Hoffsten P. (2001). Leaf litter breakdown rates in boreal streams: does shredder species richness matter?. Freshw. Biol. 46: 161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jonsson M. and Malmqvist B. (2003). Mechanisms behind positive diversity effects on ecosystem functioning: testing the facilitation and interference hypotheses. Oecologia 134: 554–559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kennedy T., Naeem S., Howe K.J., Knops J.M.H., Tilman D. and Reich P.B. (2002). Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417: 636–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kinzig A.P., Pacala S.W. and Tilman D. (eds) (2001). The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kolar C.S. and Lodge D.M. (2001). Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kula E. (2001). Islam and environmental conservation. Environ. Conserv. 28: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Laird S.A. (2002). Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Equitable Partnerships in Practice. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  52. Levine J.M. (2000). Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local processes to community pattern. Science 288: 852–854

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Levine J.M. and D'Antonio C.M. (1999). Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Levine J.M., Adler P.B. and Yelenik S.G. (2004). A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7: 975–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lhomme J. and Winkel T. 2002. Diversity–stability relationships in ecommunity ecology: re-examination of the Portfolio Effect. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 62: 271–279.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Livingstone D.M. (1994). The historic roots of our ecological crisis – a reassessment. Fides et Historia 26: 38–55

    Google Scholar 

  57. Loreau M., Naeem S. and Inchausti P. (2002). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294: 804–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lyons K.G. and Schwartz M.W. (2001). Rare species loss alters ecosystem function – invasion resistance. Ecol. Lett. 4: 358–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. MacArthur R.H. (1955). Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36: 533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Marchetti M.P., Moyle P.B. and Levine R. (2001). Invasive species profiling? Exploring the characteristics of non-native fishes across invasion stages in California. Freshw. Biol. 49: 646–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. May R.M. (1973). The Stability and Complexity of Model Ecosystems. Monographs in Population Biology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  62. McCann K., Hastings A. and Huxel G.R. (1998). Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395: 794–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Memmott J., Waser N.M. and Price M.V. (2004). Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Series B – Biol. Sci. 271: 2605–2611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Online at http://milleniumassessment.org.

  65. Morin P. and McGrady-Steed J. (2004). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in aquatic microbial systems: a new analysis of temporal variation and species richness-predictability relations. Oikos 104: 458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mouquet N., Moore J.L. and Loreau M. (2002). Plant species richness and community productivity: Why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecol. Lett. 5: 56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Murray M. (2003). Overkill and sustainable use. Science 299: 1851–1853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Naeem S., Hahn D.R. and Schuurman G. (2000). Producer-decomposer co-dependency influences biodiversity effects. Nature 403: 762–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. New Zealand Ministry for the Environment. 1997. State of New Zealand's Environment 1997. Wellington.

  70. Petchey O.L., McPhearson P.T., Casey T.M. and Morin P.J. (1999). Environmental warming alters food web structure and ecosystem function. Nature 402: 69–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Petchey O.L., Casey T.J., Jiang L., McPhearson P.T. and Price J. (2002). Species richness, environmental fluctuations, and temporal change in total community biomass. Oikos 99: 231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Petchey O.L., Downing A.L., Mittelbach G.G., Persson L., Steiner C.F., Warren P.H. and Woodward G. (2004). Species loss and the structure and functioning of multitrophic aquatic systems. Oikos 104: 467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Pfisterer A.B. and Schmid B. (2002). Diversity-dependent production can decrease the stability of ecosystem functioning. Nature 416: 84–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Pimm S.L., Russell G.J., Gittleman J.L. and Brooks T.M. (1995). The future of biodiversity. Science 269: 347–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Posey D.A. (ed.) 1996. Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications.

  76. Raffaelli D., Emmerson M., Solan M., Biles C. and Paterson D. (2003). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in shallow coastal waters: an experimental approach. J. Sea Res. 49: 133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Reich P.B., Knops J., Tilman D., Craine J., Ellsworth D., Tjoelker M., Lee T., Wedin D., Naeem S., Bahauddin D., Hendrey G., Jose S., Wrage K., Goth J. and Bengston W. (2001). Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410: 809–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Ruesink J.L. and Srivastava D.S. (2001). Numerical and per capita responses to species loss: mechanisms maintaining ecosystem function in a community of stream insect detritivores. Oikos 93: 221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Sala O.E., Armesto J.J., Berlow E., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sanwald E., Huenneke L.F., Jackson R.B., Kinzig A., Leemans R., Lodge D.M.H., Mooney H.A., Oesterheld M., Poff N.L., Sykes M.T., Walker B.H., Walker M., Wall D.H. and Chapin F.S. (2000). Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Sankaran M. and McNaughton S.J. (1999). Determinants of biodiversity regulate compositional stability of communities. Nature 401: 691–693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Sax D.F., Gaines S.D. and Brown J.H. (2002). Species invasions exceed extinctions on islands worldwide: a comparative study of plants and birds. Am. Nat. 160: 766–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Sax D.F. and Gaines S.D. (2003). Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 561–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Scheffer M., Carpenter S., Foley J.A., Folke C. and Walker B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Schwartz M.W., Brigham C.A., Hoeksema J.D., Lyons K.G., Mills M.H. and van Mantgem P.J. (2000). Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122: 297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Sekercioglu C.H., Daily G.C. and Ehrlich P.R. (2004). Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 18042–18047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Simon K.S., Townsend C.R., Biggs B.J.F., Bowden W.B. and Frew R.D. (2004). Habitat-specific nitrogen dynamics in New Zealand streams containing native or invasive fish. Ecosystem 7: 777–792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Smith M.D. and Knapp A.K. (2003). Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecol. Lett. 6: 509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Smith E.A. and Wishnie M. (2000). Conservation and subsistence in small-scale societies. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 29: 493–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Solan M., Cardinale B.J., Downing A.L., Engelhardt K.A.M., Ruesink J.L. and Srivastava D.S. (2004). Extinction and ecosystem function in the marine benthos. Science 306: 1177–1180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Srivastava D.S. (2002). The role of conservation in expanding biodiversity research. Oikos 98: 351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Stachowicz J.J., Whitlatch R.B. and Osman R.W. (1999). Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286: 1577–1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Stachowicz J.J., Fried H., Osman R.W. and Whitlatch R.B. (2002). biodiversity, invasion resistanceand marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83: 2575–2590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Taiepa T., Lyver P., Horsley P., Davis J., Bragg M. and Moller H. (1997). Comanagement of New Zealand's Conservation Estate by MGori and Pakeha: a review. Environ. Conserv. 24: 236–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Tilman D. and Downing J. (1994). Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367: 363–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Tilman D., Reich P.B., Knops J., Wedin D., Mielke T. and Lehman C. (2001). Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294: 843–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Toledo V.M. (2001). Indigenous peoples and biodiversity. In: Levin, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, pp. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  97. Turner-Erfort G. (1996). Public awareness and perceptions of biodiversity. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 77: 449–452

    Google Scholar 

  98. UNEP. 2003. Traditional lifestyles and biodiversity use. Regional report: Europe and Russia. Prepared for the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity by UNEP-WCMC.

  99. UNESCO. 1972. World Heritage Convention.. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.

  100. vanden Born R.J.G., Lenders R.H.J., de Groot W.T. and Huijsman E. (2001). The new biophilia: an exploration of visions of nature in Western countries. Environ. Conserv. 28: 65–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. van Ruijven J. and Berendse F. (2003). Positive effects of plant species diversity on productivity in the absence of legumes. Ecol. Lett. 6: 170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Vitousek P.M., Aber J.D. Howarth R.W., Likens G.E., Matson P.A., Schindler D.A., Schlesinger W.H. and Tilman D. (1997). Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol. Appl. 7: 737–750

    Google Scholar 

  103. Walker B. (1992). Biological diversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv. Biol. 6: 18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Wilson E.O. 1984. Biophilia. Harvard Press.

  105. Wilson E.O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Harvard Press.

  106. Wilson E.O. (1997). Introduction. In: Reaka-Kudla, M.L., Wilson, D.E. and Wilson, E.O. (eds) Biodiversity II: Understanding and Protecting our Biological Resources, pp 1–3. Joseph Henry Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  107. Wohl D.L., Arora S. and Gladstone J.R. (2004). Functional redundancy supports biodiversity and ecosystem function in a closed and constant environment. Ecology 85: 1534–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Yachi S. and Loreau M. (1999). Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 1463–1468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Zak D.R., Holmes W.E., White D.C., Peacock A.D. and Tilman D. (2003). Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links?. Ecology 84: 2042–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Zavaleta E.S. and Hulvey K.B. (2004). Realistic species losses disproportionately reduce grassland resistance to biological invaders. Science 306: 1175–1177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Zimmerman B., Peres C.A., Malcolm J.R. and Turner T. (2001). Conservation and development alliances with the Kayapó of south-eastern Amazoniaa tropical forest indigenous people. Environ. Conserv. 28: 10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., V6T 1Z4, Vancouver BC, Canada

    Ross Thompson & Brian M. Starzomski

  2. School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, 3800, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

    Ross Thompson

Authors
  1. Ross Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian M. Starzomski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, R., Starzomski, B.M. What does biodiversity actually do? A review for managers and policy makers. Biodivers Conserv 16, 1359–1378 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6232-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6232-9

Key words

Search

Navigation