Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

When should exotic forest plantation tree species be considered as an invasive threat and how should we treat them?

  • Perspectives and paradigms
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The area of forests planted with exotic tree species is increasing worldwide in order to fulfill various economic and environmental demands. Numerous species currently used in forest plantations are considered to be invasive in many parts of the world. Exotic plantation tree species are endowed with a series of life-history traits that are characteristic of invasive species: easy establishment, fast growth, high propagule pressure, and low or intermediate shade tolerance. In addition, plantation forestry presents many features that increase ecosystem invasibility, including a regime of frequent and intensive canopy disturbances, a dense network of roads and trails with continuous traffic, and wide plantation areas. Exotic trees planted for production purposes have strong direct positive economic impacts on the local and national economies of many countries, often leading to notable conflicts of interest when the species becomes invasive, as well as to negative impacts on the ecosystem. Studies and management programs mainly focus on Pinus and Acacia, which are used as model species. Complementary management strategies have been established to control these species at different stages of the invasion process. Knowledge gained is useful to predict problems in other regions of the world with the same species and to guide research or management actions on other problematic but less studied tree species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams JM, Fang W, Callaway RM, Cipollini D, Newell E, Transatlantic Acer Platanoides Invasion Network (TRAIN) (2009) A cross-continental test of the enemy release hypothesis: leaf herbivory on acer platanoides (L.) is three times lower in North America than in its native Europe. Biol Invasions 11:1005–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Almasi KN (2000) A non-native perennial invades a native forest. Biol Invasions 2:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binggeli P (1996) A taxonomic, biogeographical and ecological overview of invasive woody plants. J Veg Sci 7:121–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binggeli P (2001) Time-lags between introduction, establishment and rapid spread of introduced environmental weeds. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international weed science congress; 2000 June 6–11; Foz do Iguassu, Brazil, Manuscript no 238, 17 p., CD-ROM. Available from: International Weed Science Society, Oxford, MS, USA

  • Biring BS, Comeau PG, Fielder P (2003) Long-term effects of vegetation control treatments for release of Engelmann spruce from a mixed-shrub community in Southern British Columbia. Ann For Sci 60:681–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broncano MJ, Vilà M, Boada M (2005) Evidence of Pseudotsuga menziesii naturalization in montane Mediterranean forests. For Ecol Manage 211:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KA, Scatena FN, Gurevitch J (2006) Effects of an invasive tree on community structure and diversity in a tropical forest in Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manage 226:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchavora A, van Kleunen M (2009) Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North America woody species in Europe. J Ecol 97:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buscardo E, Smith GF, Kelly DL, Freitas H, Iremonger S, Mitchell FJG, O’Donoghue S, McKee A-M (2008) The early effects of afforestation on biodiversity of grasslands in Ireland. Biodiversity Conserv 17:1057–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers JE, Reichard S, Randall JM, Parker IM, Smith CS, Lonsdale WM, Atkinson IAE, Seastedt TR, Williamson M, Chornesky E, Hayes D (2002) Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conserv Biol 16:630–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacho OJ, Spring D, Pheloung P, Hester S (2006) Evaluating the feasibility of eradicating an invasion. Biol Invasions 8:903–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chornesky EA, Bartuska AM, Aplet GH, Britton KO, Cummings-Carlson J, Davis FW, Gordon DR, Gottschalk KW, Haack RA, Hansen AJ, Mack RN, Rahel FJ, Shannon MA, Wainger LA, Wingley TB (2005) Science priorities for reducing the threat of invasive species to sustainable forestry. Bioscience 55:335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Closset-Kopp D, Chabrerie O, Valentin B, Delachapelle H, Decocq G (2007) When Oskar meets Alice: does a lack of trade-off in r/K-strategies make Prunus serotina a successful invader of European forests? For Ecol Manage 247:120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer K, van Kraayenoord C, Parker N, Streatfield S (1995) Willows spreading by seed: implications for Australian river management. Aust J Soil Water Conserv 8:18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk QCB, Fuller JL (1995) Plant invaders. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Daneshgar P, Jose S (2009) Mechanisms of plant invasion: a review. In: Kohli RK, Jose P (eds) Invasive plants and forest ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 11–28

  • D’Antonio C, Meyerson LA (2002) Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Restor Ecol 10:703–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit MP, Crookes DJ, van Wilgen BW (2001) Conflicts of interest in environmental management: estimating the costs and benefits of a tree invasion. Biol Invasions 3:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckers B, Verheyen K, Hermy M, Muys B (2005) Effects of landscape structure on the invasive spread of black cherry Prunus serotina in an agricultural landscape in Flanders, Belgium. Ecography 28:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denslow JS (2002) Invasive alien woody species in Pacific island forests. Unasylva 209:62–63. Available at: www.fao.org/docrep/004/y3582e/y3582e14.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Despain DG (2001) Dispersal ecology of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) in its native environment as related to Swedish forestry. For Ecol Manage 141:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JG (2011) Transformers. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 667–670

  • Engelmark O, Sjöberg K, Andersson B, Rosvall O, Ågren GI, Baker WL, Barklund P, Björkman C, Despain DG, Elfving B, Ennos RA, Karlman M, Knecht MF, Knight DH, Ledgard NJ, Lindelöw A, Nilsson C, Peterken GF, Sörlin S, Sykes MT (2001) Ecological effects and management aspects of an exotic tree species: the case of lodgepole pine in Sweden. For Ecol Manage 141:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essl F, Moser D, Dullinger S, Mang T, Hulme P (2010) Selection for commercial forestry determines global patterns of alien conifer invasions. Divers Distrib 16:911–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewel JJ, O’Dowd DJ, Bergelson J, Daehler CC, D’Antonio CM, Gómez LD, Gordon DR, Hobbs RJ, Holt A, Hopper KR, Hughes CE, LaHart M, Leakey RRB, Lee WG, Loope LL, Lorence DH, Louda SM, Lugo AE, McEvoy PB, Richardson DM, Vitousek PM (1999) Deliberate introductions of species: research needs. Bioscience 49:619–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan ME, Peart DR (2004) Impact of the invasive shrub glossy buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula L.) on the juvenile recruitment by canopy trees. For Ecol Manage 194:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment. Forestry Department. FAO, Rome. Available at www.fao.org/forestry/fra2010

  • FAO (2011) State of the World’s Forests. Forestry Department. FAO, Rome. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i2000e/i2000e00.htm

  • Fine PVA (2002) The invasibility of tropical forests by exotic plants. J Trop Ecol 18:687–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnoff D, Shogren J, Leung B, Lodge D (2007) Take a risk: preferring prevention over control biological invaders. Ecol Econ 62:216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth GG, Richardson DM, Brown PJ, van Wilgen BW (2004) A rapid assessment of the invasive status of Eucalyptus species in two South African provinces. S Afr J Sci 100:75–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman JE, Jose S (2009) The role of herbicide in savanna restoration: effects of shrub reduction treatments on the understory and overstory of a longleaf pine fatwoods. For Ecol Manage 257:978–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith-Kent SL, Handel SN (2008) Invasive Acer platanoides inhibits native sapling growth in forest understorey communities. J Ecol 96:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson MR, Richardson DM, Marchante E, Marchante H, Rodger JG, Stone GN, Byrne M, Fuentes-Ramirez A, George N, Harris C, Johnson SD, Le Roux JJ, Miller JT, Murphy DJ, Pauw A, Prescott MN, Wandrag EM, Wilson JRU (2011) Reproductive biology of Australian acacias: important mediator of invasiveness? Divers Distrib 17:911–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodland TCR, Healey JR, Binggeli P (1998) Control and management of invasive alien woody plants in tropics. School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, Publication No 14

  • Haysom KA, Murphy ST (2003) The status of invasiveness of forest tree species outside their natural habitat: a global review and discussion paper. Forest Health and Biosecurity Working Paper FBS/3E. Forestry Department. FAO, Rome (unpublished)

  • Higgins SI, Richardson DM (1998) Pine invasions in the southern hemisphere: modelling interactions between organism, environment and disturbance. Plant Ecol 135:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Azorin EJ, Cowling RM, Morris MJ (1997) A dynamic ecological-economic model as a tool for conflict resolution in an invasive alien plant, biological control and native plant scenario. Ecol Econ 22:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann JH, Moran VC, van Wilgen BW (2011) Prospects for the biological control of invasive Pinus species (Pinaceae) in South Africa. Afr Entomol 19:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes TP, Aukema JE, Von Holle B, Liebhold A, Sills E (2009) Economic impacts of invasive species in forests—past, present, and future. Ann NY Acad Sci 1162:18–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (2011) Weed risk assessment: a way forward or a waste of time? J Appl Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02069.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Křivánek M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2006) Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv Biol 20:1487–1498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kull CA, Shackleton CM, Cunningham PJ, Ducatillon C, Dufour-Dror J-M, Esler KJ, Friday JB, Gouveia AC, Griffin AR, Marchante E, Midgley SJ, Pauchard A, Rangan H, Richardson DM, Rinaudo T, Tassin J, Urgenson LS, von Maltitz GP, Zenni RD, Zylstra MJ (2011) Adoption, use and perception of Australian acacias around the world. Divers Distrib 17:822–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamarque LJ, Delzon S, Lortie CJ (2011) Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits. Biol Invasions 13:1969–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Maitre DC, Gaertner M, Marchante E, Ens E-J, Holmes PM, Pauchard A, O’Farrell PJ, Rogers AM, Blanchard R, Blignaut J, Richardson DM (2011) Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration. Divers Distrib 17:1015–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard N (2001) The spread of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta, Dougl.) in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 141:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard NJ (2009) Wilding control guidelines for farmers and land managers. N Z Plant Prot 62:380–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis on invasive species. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2407–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloret F, Médail F, Brundu G, Camarda I, Moragues E, Ritas J, Lambdon P, Hulme PE (2005) Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. J Ecol 93:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C (2003) Competitive displacement of trees in response to environmental change or introduction of exotics. Environ Manage 32:106–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lozon JD, MacIsaac HJ (1997) Biological invasions: are they dependent on disturbance? Environ Rev 5:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald IAW, Richardson DM (1986) Alien species in terrestrial ecosystems of the fynbos biome. In: Macdonald IAW, Kruger FJ, Ferrar AA (eds) The ecology and management of biological invasions in southern Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, pp 77–91

  • Markin GP, Gardner DE (1993) Status of biological control in vegetation management in forestry. Can J For Res 23:2023–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Vilà M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oïkos 95:361–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PH (1999) Norway maple (Acer platanoides) invasion of a natural forest stand: understory consequence and regeneration pattern. Biol Invasions 1:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PH, Marks PL (2006) Intact forests provide only weak resistance to a shade-tolerant invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.). J Ecol 94:1070–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PH, Canham CD, Marks PL (2009) Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Frontiers Ecol Environ 7:142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore BA (2005) Alien invasive species: impacts on forests and forestry. A review. Forest resources development service working paper FBS/8E. Forestry Department. FAO, Rome (unpublished)

  • Moore JL, Runge MC, Webber BL, Wilson JRU (2011) Contain or eradicate? Optimizing the management goal for Australian acacia invasions in the face of uncertainty. Divers Distrib 17:1047–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran VC, Hoffmann JH, Donnelly D, van Wilgen BW, Zimmermann HG (2000) Biological control of alien, invasive pine tress (Pinus species) in South Africa. In: Proceedings of the X international symposium on biological control of weeds, 1999 July 4–14, Montana State University, Montana, USA, pp 941–953

  • Morris TL, Esler KJ, Barger NN, Jacobs SM, Cramer MD (2011) Ecophysiological traits associated with the competitive ability of invasive Australian acacias. Divers Distrib 17:898–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley CT, Cramer MD, Kleinjan CA, Hoffmann JH (2009) Why does Dasineura dielsi-induced galling of Acacia cyclops not impede vegetative growth? J Appl Ecol 46:214–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motta R, Nola P, Berretti R (2009) The rise and fall of the black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in the “Siro Negri” forest reserve (Lombardy, Italy): lessons learned and future uncertainties. Ann For Sci 66:410

    Google Scholar 

  • Müllerová J, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J (2005) Aerial photographs as a tool for assessing the regional dynamics of the invasive plant species Heracleum mantegazzianum. J Appl Ecol 42:1042–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair KSS (2001) Pest outbreaks in tropical forest plantations: is there a greater risk for exotic tree species? Centre for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, Indonesia, 74 p

  • Nyoka BI (2003) Biosecurity in forestry: a case study on the status of invasive forest trees species in Southern Africa. Forest biosecurity working paper FBS/1E. Forestry Department. FAO, Rome (unpublished). Available at: http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/AC846E/ac846e00.htm#Contents

  • Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott L (2002) Complexity and the limits of ecological engineering. Trans Asae 45:1697–1702

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken GF (2001) Ecological effects of introduced tree species in Britain. For Ecol Manage 141:31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit RJ, Bialozit R, Garnier-Géré P, Hampe A (2004) Ecology and genetics of tree invasions: from recent introductions to Quaternary migrations. For Ecol Manage 197:117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proches S, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Rejmanek M (2012) Native and naturalised range size in Pinus: relative importance of biogeography, introduction effort and species traits. Global Ecol Biogeography. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00703.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Pysek P, Richardson DM, Rejmanek M, Webster GL, Williamson M, Kirschner J (2004) Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Křivánek M, Jarošík V (2009) Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90:2734–2744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart KO, Gurnee J, Tirado R, Callaway RM (2006) Invasion through quantitative effects: intense shade drives native decline and invasive success. Ecol Appl 16:1821–1831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M (1989) Invasibility of plant communities. In: Drake et al (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, New York, Chapter 16, pp 369–388

  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek M, Richardson DM (2011) Eucalypts. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 203–209

  • Richardson DM (1998) Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv Biol 12:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM (2006) Pinus: a model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions? Preslia 78:375–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM (2011a) Forestry and agroforestry. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 241–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM (2011b) Teees and shrubs. In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 670–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Petit RJ (2005) Pines as invasive aliens: outlook on transgenic pine plantations in the Southern Hemisphere. In: Williams CG (ed) Landscapes, genomics and transgenic conifers. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 169–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Rejmanek M (2011) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species—a global review. Divers Distrib 17:788–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Cowling RM, Le Maitre DC (1990) Assessing the risk of invasive success in Pinus and Banksia in South African Mountain Fynbos. J Veg Sci 1:629–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Williams PA, Hobbs RJ (1994) Pine invasions in the Southern Hemisphere: determinants of spread and invadability. J Biogeogr 21:511–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pysek P, Rejmanek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Binggeli P, Schroth G (2004) Invasive agroforestry trees: problems and solutions. In: Schroth G, de Fonseca GAB, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos H, Izac MMN (eds) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 371–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts W, Harrod O, Mitterdorfer B, Pheloung P (2011) Regulating invasive plants and use of weed risk assessments. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouget M, Richardson DM, Milton SJM, Polakow D (2001) Predicting the dynamics of four invasive Pinus species in a fragmented semi-arid shrubland in South Africa. Plant Ecol 152:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouget M, Richardson DM, Nel JL, van Wilgen BW (2002) Commercially important trees as invasive aliens—towards spatially explicit risk assessment at a national scale. Biol Invasions 4:397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schierenbeck KA, Ellstrand NC (2009) Hybridization and the evolution of invasiveness in plants and other organisms. Biol Invasions 11:1093–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebert-Cuvillier E, Simon-Goyheneche V, Paccaut F, Chabrerie O, Goubet O, Decocq G (2008) Spatial spread of an alien tree species in a heterogeneous forest landscape: a spatially realistic simulation model. Landscape Ecol 23:787–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebert-Cuvillier E, Simonet M, Simon-Goyheneche V, Paccaut F, Goubet O, Decocq G (2010) PRUNUS: a spatially explicit demographic model to study plant invasions in stochastic, heterogeneous environments. Biol Invasions 12:1183–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2009) We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects. Biol Invasions 11:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Relva MA, Nuñez M (2002) Gringos en el bosque: introduced tree invasion in a native Nothofagus/Austrocedrus forest. Biol Invasions 4:35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Nuñez MA, Ledgard NJ, Pauchard A, Richardson DM, Sarasola M, van Wilgen BW, Zalba SM, Zenni RD, Bustamante R, Peña E, Ziller SR (2010) Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Austral Ecol 35:489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176:256–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele J, Kollmann J, Markussen B, Otte A (2010) Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. Biol Invasions 12:2025–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM, le Maitre DC, Marais C, Magadlela D (2001) The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa. Environ Dev Sustain 3:145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wilgen BW, Dyer C, Hoffmann JH, Ivey P, Le Maitre DC, Moore JL, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Wannenburgh A, Wilson JRU (2011) National-scale strategic approaches for managing introduced plants: insights from Australian acacias in South Africa. Divers Distrib 17:1060–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhellemont M, Wauters L, Baeten L, Bijlsma R-J, De Frenne P, Hermy M, Verheyen K (2010) Prunus serotina unleashed: invader dominance after 70 years of forest development. Biol Invasions 12:1113–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vila M, Ibañez I (2011) Plant invasions in the landscape. Landscape Ecol 26:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangen SR, Webster CR (2006) Potential for multiple lag phases during biotic invasions: reconstructing an invasion of the exotic tree Acer platanoides. J Appl Ecol 43:258–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangen SR, Webster CR, Griggs JA (2006) Spatial characteristics of the invasion of Acer platanoides on a temperate forested island. Biol Invasions 8:1001–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ, Lowe AJ, Richardson DM (2009) Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol Evol 24:136–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JRU, Gairifo C, Gibson MR, Arianoutsou M, Bakar BB, Baret S, Celesti-Grapow L, DiTomaso JM, Dufour-Dror J-M, Kueffer C, Kull CA, Hoffmann JH, Impson FAC, Loope LL, Marchante E, Marchante H, Moore JL, Murphy DJ, Tassin J, Witt A, Zenni RD, Richardson DM (2011) Risk assessment, eradication, and biological control: global efforts to limit Australian acacia invasions. Divers Distrib 17:1030–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA (2002) The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conserv Biol 16:1192–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski ETF (1991) Effects of alien Acacias on nutrient cycling in coastal lowlands of the Cape Fynbos. J Appl Ecol 28:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support from the French Ministry of Agriculture and Fishing (Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche) and the French Forest Service (Office National des Forêts). We thank two anonymous reviewers and David Richardson, the journal editor, for their insightful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Collet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodet, M., Collet, C. When should exotic forest plantation tree species be considered as an invasive threat and how should we treat them?. Biol Invasions 14, 1765–1778 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0202-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0202-4

Keywords

Navigation