Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Estimating costs and outcomes of invasive American mink (Neovison vison) management in continental areas: a framework for evidence based control and eradication

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduced predators are a major threat to biodiversity. While in island ecosystems the favoured management option is species eradication, in continental areas most managers tend to control-orientated options, assuming that eradication is an impossible goal. However, many management actions are conducted without precise or quantifiable goals, and their output is difficult to assess due to the lack of experimental approaches and scientific evidence. Here, we analyse the results of a typical small-scale short-term management action consisting of live-trapping and culling invasive American mink. We estimate the American mink population size at the beginning of the study assuming three different scenarios, assess the output of the management action in each scenario and model the results of further trapping efforts. Based on the results we estimate the effort and economic costs required for culling different population percentages per unit area, as well as the costs and feasibility of eradication. Our results provide a basis for planning invasive predator management, setting realistic management goals and estimating funding required, as well as a framework for managers to evaluate on-going management actions. In addition, our results suggest that American mink eradication from some continental areas would be feasible with current techniques at a moderate-low cost. We suggest that invasive predator management in continental areas should move towards eradication when feasible, regarding control as a second option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon. (2007) Europe’s environment. The fourth assessment. European Environment Agency. Copenhagen, Denmark, p 452

  • Bomford M, Obrien P (1995) Eradication or control for vertebrate pests. Wildl Soc Bull 23:249–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonesi L, Palazon S (2007) The American mink in Europe: status, impact, and control. Biol Conserv 134:470–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonesi L, Rushton SP, Maconald DW (2007) Trapping for mink control and water vole survival: identifying key criteria using a spatially explicit individual based model. Biol Conserv 136:636–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo F (2007) Neovison vison Schreber, 1777. Atlas y libro rojo de los mamíferos terrestres de España. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU, pp 299–301

  • Bremner A, Park K (2007) Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland. Biol Conserv 139:306–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KP, Sherley GH (2002) The eradication of possums from Kapiti Island, New Zealand. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide of biological invasions: the potential for eradicating invasive species. Proceedings of the international conference on Eradication of Island Invasives. Occasional paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK), pp 46–52

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York, p 488

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquenot D, Parkes J (2001) Setting thresholds for pest control: how does pest density affect resource viability? Biol Conserv 99:29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clout MN, Veitch CR (2002) Turning the tide of biological invasions: the potential for eradicating invasive species. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide of biological invasions: the potential for eradicating invasive species. Proceedings of the international conference on Eradication of Island Invasives. Occasional paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, vol 27, pp 1–3

  • Connolly TA, Day TD, King CM (2009) Estimating the potential for reinvasion by mammalian pests through pest-exclusion fencing. Wildl Res 36:410–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsi F, de Leeuw J, Skidmore A (2000) Modeling species distribution with GIS. In: Boitani L, Fuller TK (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology. Controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 389–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik CA (2008) Sex ratio in catches of American mink—how to catch the females. J Nat Conserv 16:56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day T, MacGibbon R (2007) Multiple-species exclusion fencing and technology for mainland sites. In: Witmer GW, Pitt WC, Fagerstone KA (eds) Managing vertebrate invasive species. National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, pp 418–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Delibes M, Clavero M, Prenda J, Blázquez MC, Ferreras P (2004) Potential impact of an exotic mammal on rocky intertidal communities of northwestern Spain. Biol Invasions 6:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunstone N (1993) The mink.T, A. D. Poyser, London, p 232

  • Genovesi P (2005) Eradications of invasive alien species in Europe: a review. Biol Invasions 7:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerell R (1970) Home ranges and movements of the mink Mustela vison Schreber in southern Sweden. Oikos 21:160–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall R, Hastings A (2007) Minimizing invader impacts: striking the right balance between removal and restoration. J Theor Biol 249:437–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington LA, Harrington AL, Moorhouse T, Gelling M, Bonesi L, Macdonald DW (2009) American mink control on inland rivers in southern England: an experimental test of a model strategy. Biol Conserv 142:839–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howald G, Donlan CJ, Galvan JP, Russell JC, Parkes J, Samaniego A, Wang YW, Veitch D, Genovesi P, Pascal M, Saunders A, Tershy B (2007) Invasive rodent eradication on islands. Conserv Biol 21:1258–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katsanevakis S (2007) Density modelling with line transect sampling as a tool for abundance estimation of marine benthic species: the Pinna nobilis example in a marine lake. Mar Biol 152:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King CM, McDonald RM, Martin RD, Dennis T (2009) Why is eradication of invasive mustelids so difficult? Biol Conserv 142:806–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorvelec O, Pascal M (2005) French attempts to eradicate non-indigenous mammals and their consequences for native biota. Biol Invasions 7:135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovegrove TG, Zeiler CH, Greene BS, Green BW, Gaastra R, MacArthur AD (2002) Alien plant and animal control and aspects of ecological restoration in a small ‘mainland island’: Wenderholm Regional Park, New Zealand. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide of biological invasions: the potential for eradicating invasive species. Proceedings of the international conference on Eradication of Island Invasives. Occasional paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK), pp 155–163

  • Macdonald DW, Harrington LA (2003) The American mink: the triumph and tragedy of adaptation out of context. N Z J Zool 30:421–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maran T (2000) Removal of American mink, Mustela vison, from Hiiumaa. Unpublished Report (accessible at http://www.lutreola.ee/pdf/removal_eng.pdf), p 6

  • Melero Y, Palazon S, Bonesi L, Gosalbez J (2008a) Feeding habits of three sympatric mammals in NE Spain: the American mink, the spotted genet, and the Eurasian otter. Acta Theriologica 53:263–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Melero Y, Palazon S, Revilla E, Martelo J, Gosalbez J (2008b) Space use and habitat preferences of the invasive American mink (Mustela vison) in a Mediterranea area. Eur J Wildl Res 54:609–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore NP, Roy SS, Helyar A (2003) Mink (Mustela vison) eradication to protect ground-nesting birds in the Western Isles, Scotland, United Kingdom. N Z J Zool 30:443–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogales M, Martín A, Tershy BR, Donlan CJ, Veitch D, Puerta N, Wood B, Alonso J (2004) Review of feral cat eradication on islands. Conserv Biol 18:310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom M, Korpimaki E (2004) Effects of isolation and feral mink removal on bird communities on small islands in the Baltic Sea. J Anim Ecol 73:424–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes J, Murphy E (2003) Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. 3rd International wildlife management congress, pp 335–359, Sir Publishing, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Parkes J, Panetta D (2009) Eradication of invasive species: progress and emerging issues in the 21st century. In: Clout MN, Williams PA (eds) Invasive species management. A handbook of principles and techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes JP, Robley A, Forsyth DM, Choquenot D (2006) Adaptive management experiments in vertebrate pest control in New Zealand and Australia. Wildl Soc Bull 34:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell RA (1979) Mustelid spacing patterns: variations on a theme by Mustela. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 50:153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Rainbolt RE, Coblentz BE (1997) A different perspective on eradication of vertebrate pests. Wildl Soc Bull 25:189–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey DSL, Parkes J, Morrison SA (2009) Quantifying eradication success: the removal of feral pigs from Santa Cruz Island, California. Conserv Biol 23:449–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JC, Short MJ, Leigh RJ (2004) Development of population control strategies for mink Mustela vison, using floating rafts as monitors and trap sites. Biol Conserv 120:533–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy SS, Macleod I, Moore NP (2006) The use of scent glands to improve the efficiency of mink (Mustela vison) captures in the Outer Hebrides. N Z J Zool 33:267–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders A, Norton DA (2001) Ecological restoration at Mainland Islands in New Zealand. Biol Conserv 99:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper J (2007) Camera-trap avoidance by Kinkajous Potos flavus: rethinking the “non invasive” paradigm. Small Carniv Conserv 36:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2002) Today Tiritiri Matangi, tomorrow the world! Are we aiming too low in invasive control? In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide of biological invasions: the potential for eradicating invasive species. Proceedings of the international conference on Eradication of Island Invasives. Occasional paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK), pp 4–12

  • Simberloff D (2005) The politics of assessing risk for biological invasions: the USA as a case study. Trends Ecol Evol 20:216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:305–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler C, Clark E, Pullin AS (2005) Do management interventions effectively reduce or eradicate populations of the American mink, Mustela vison?, p 22, Systematic review No. 7 Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi N, Macdonald DW (2003) The burden of co-occupancy: intraspecific resource competition and spacing patterns in American mink, Mustela vison. J Mammal 84:1341–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabala J, Zuberogoitia I, Garin I, Aihartza JR (2001) Small carnivore trappability: seasonal changes and mortality. A case study on European mink Mustela lutreola and Spotted genet Genetta genetta. Small Carniv Conserv 25:9–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabala J, Zuberogoitia I, Martínez JA (2007a) Spacing pattern, intrasexual competition and niche segregation in American mink. Ann Zool Fenn 44:249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabala J, Zuberogoitia I, Martínez JA (2007b) Winter habitat preferences of feral American mink Mustela vison Schreber, 1777 in Biscay (Northern Iberian Peninsula). Acta Theriologica 52:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavaleta ES, Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (2001) Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends Ecol Evol 16:454–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuberogoitia I, Zabala J (2003) Aproximación a la distribución del Visón Americano en Bizkaia. Galemys 15:29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuberogoitia I, Zabala J, Martínez JA (2006a) Diurnal activity and observations of the hunting and ranging behaviour of the American mink (Mustela Vison). Mammalia 70:310–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuberogoitia I, Zabala J, Martínez JA (2006b) Evaluation of sign surveys and trappability of American mink. Consequences for management. Folia Zoologica 55:257–263

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by the Regional Council of Biscay’s Conservation and Nature Reserves Area. The authors wish to express their gratitude to A. Azkona and Cristina Rodriguez for their assistance in the field. Comments by D. Simberloff and 2 anonymous reviewers improved a previous draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Euskadi Biodiversity Centre, Madariaga Dorretxea, San Bartolomé 35, 48350, Busturia, Bizkaia, Spain

    Jabi Zabala

  2. E. M. Icarus S. L., Pintor Sorolla 6, 1°, 26007, Logroño, Spain

    Iñigo Zuberogoitia

  3. Dept. Ecosistemas, Neiker-Tecnalia, Berreaga 1, 48160, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain

    Jose A. González-Oreja

Authors
  1. Jabi Zabala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iñigo Zuberogoitia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jose A. González-Oreja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jabi Zabala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zabala, J., Zuberogoitia, I. & González-Oreja, J.A. Estimating costs and outcomes of invasive American mink (Neovison vison) management in continental areas: a framework for evidence based control and eradication. Biol Invasions 12, 2999–3012 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9690-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9690-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation