Skip to main content
Log in

Ontological Aspects of Measurement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of measurement is fundamental to a whole range of different disciplines, including not only the natural and engineering sciences, but also laboratory medicine and certain branches of the social sciences. This being the case, the concept of measurement has a particular relevance to the development of top-level ontologies in the area of knowledge engineering. For this reason, the present paper is concerned with ontological aspects of measurement. We are searching for a list of concepts that are apt to characterize measurement methods in a general manner. To establish such means of characterization, we will primarily deal with the semantics of measurement values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Requiring the metrization to be a standard one is necessary, since it is possible to set up arbitrary extensive metrizations for any quantity. A metrization is a standard one if it recognized as such, either by explicit conventions as the SI system or the practice of measurement or both.

  2. In extending the use of the expression “metrization” to empirical quantities, we are following Diez (1997).

  3. This account presupposes the framework of pre-relativistic physics, where the concept of simultaneity does not depend on the system of reference chosen.

  4. For theoretical background of the triple point of water and the technical means to reproduce it see Nicholas and White (2001, pp. 95–105).

  5. For a thorough treatment of thermodynamic temperature and its measurement see Nicholas and White (2001) and Quinn (1990). There, the reader will also find further methods to define an assignment of numerical values for the quantity temperature.

  6. Resistance thermometer are based on the dependency between the temperature of a wire and its electrical resistance. For a thorough treatment see Nicholas and White (2001, pp. 114–119).

  7. For the latter see Riedi (1988).

  8. At least in the case of Suppes (1963), this is somewhat surprising since it appeared in the Handbook of Mathematical Psychology.

  9. In addition to having a different zero point, mercury and gas thermometers show a significant difference when intervals at very low temperatures are measured even though the intervals of the Celsius-scale and of the thermodynamic temperature scale are chosen to be equivalent. This equivalence holds only well within a limited range of these scales. Again it is necessary to know the underlying metrization. Since only then we are able to compute the transformation between both scales.

  10. Definitions in mathematical logic are required to be conservative extensions of the language system, i.e., the adoption of a definition must not extend the valid consequence relations between sets of sentences and single sentences, where in these sentence only non-defined symbols are used. This requirement is, in general, not satisfied by rules or axioms introducing symbols for an empirical metrical concepts into a language system.

References

  • Bach GL (1980) Economics. An introduction to analysis and policy. Prentice-Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O (2000) Macroeconomics. Prentice-Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R (1966) Physikalische Begriffsbildung, 2nd edn. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft Darmstadt, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Díez A (1997) A hundred years of numbers: a historical introduction to measurement theory part I: the formation period. Stud Hist Philos Sci 21:167–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N (1998) Formal ontology in information systems. In: Guarino N (ed) 1st international conference on formal ontology in information systems (FOIS98). IOS Press, Trento, pp 3–15

  • Hameed A, Preece A, Sleeman D (2003) Ontology reconciliation. In: Staab S, Studer R (eds) Handbook on ontologies in information systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 231–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Herre H, Heller B, Burek P, Hoehndorf R, Michalek H (2006) General formal ontology (GFO). A foundational ontology integrating objects and processes. Onto-Med-Report 8, Leipzig

  • Narens L (1985) Abstract measurement theory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas JV, White DR (2001) Traceable temperatures. An introduction to temperature measurement and calibration, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pevsner J (2003) Bioinformatics and functional genomics. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TJ (1990) Temperature, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Riede PC (1988) Thermal physics. An introduction to thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, and kinetic theory, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen R (1978) Fundamentals of measurement and representation of natural systems. Elsevier North Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton RA, Straits BC (2005) Approaches to social research, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldatova LN, King RD (2006) An ontology of scientific experiments. J R Soc (in press)

  • Stegmüller W (1970) Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Theorie und Erfahrung (Bd. II), Teilbd. 1. Berlin

  • Suppes P (1963) Basic measurement theory. In: Luce RD, Bush RR, Galanter E (eds) Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol 1, Chap 1. Wiley, New York, pp 1–76

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant of the DAAD, the German Academic Exchange Service. I am also grateful to an unknown reviewer for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Andreas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andreas, H. Ontological Aspects of Measurement. Axiomathes 18, 379–394 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-008-9039-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-008-9039-y

Keywords

Navigation