Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Young Adults’ Emotional Reactions After Hooking Up Encounters

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hooking up or a sexual encounter ranging from kissing to intercourse that occurs on one occasion and where the partners do not necessarily expect future physical encounters or a committed relationship has become common place among college students. This study (N = 500) examined gender differences in emotional reactions after hooking up and explored the relationship between specific processes in the hooking up encounter and reactions to hooking up. Compared to women, men reported more positive and fewer negative emotional reactions; however, both men and women reported that the experience was largely more positive than negative. Coital hook ups were associated with fewer negative emotional responses for men as compared to women who engaged in coital and non-coital hook ups and to men who engaged in non-coital hook ups. For those who engaged in coital hook ups, women reported that condom use was associated with fewer positive and more negative emotional reactions whereas condom use was related to fewer negative emotion reactions for men. Negative emotional reactions were also related to reports of depressive symptoms and feelings of loneliness; however, feelings of loneliness were not related to negative emotional reactions after accounting for young adults’ positive emotional reactions. Positive emotional reactions were related to hope for and discussion of a committed relationship. Implications for relationship education and future research are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. A., McNair, L. D., Corbin, W. R., & Williams, M. (1999). Gender differences related to heterosexual condom use: The influence of negotiation styles. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 25, 217–225.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. C., Rabin, A. S., Smith, T. L., & Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form. Psychological Assessment, 16, 360–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desiderato, L. L., & Crawford, H. J. (1995). Risky sexual behavior in college students: Relationship between number of sex partners, disclosure of previous risky behavior, and alcohol use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behaviors. Health Communications, 5, 239–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2009). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.

  • Fincham, F. D., & Linfield, K. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentzler, A. L., & Kerns, K. A. (2004). Associations between insecure attachment and sexual experiences. Personal Relationships, 11, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York: Institute for American Values.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. A. (2002). Gender, relationship stage, and sexual behavior: The importance of partner emotional investment within specific situations. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 228–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, A., Kline, E., & Oken, E. (1992). Minority women and sexual choice in the age of AIDS. Social Science and Medicine, 34, 447–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, B. C., & Schafer, J. C. (1993). Heavy drinking occasions and the occurrence of sexual activity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 7, 197–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F. (1997). Nonrelational sexuality in men. In R. F. Levant & G. R. Brooks (Eds.), Men and sex: New psychological perspectives (pp. 9–27). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R., Good, G. E., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2003). Masculinity scripts, presenting concerns and help-seeking: Implications for practice and training. Professional Psychology: Theory, Research and Practice, 34, 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2005). Adolescents’ involvement in non-romantic sexual activity. Social Science Research, 34, 384–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, R. E., Paldino, D., & Johnson, M. D. (2007). The increased construct validity and clinical utility of assessing relationship quality using separate positive and negative dimensions. Psychological Assessment, 19, 146–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Misovich, S. J., Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1997). Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: Evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Review of General Psychology, 1, 72–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. F., & Gaines, M. E. (1998). Decision-making in college students’ heterosexual dating relationships: Ambivalence about engaging in sexual activity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (in press). Effects of gender and psychosocial factors on “friends with benefits” relationships among young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9611-6.

  • Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The causalities of “causal sex”: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., & Gordon, S. L. (1985). Women and men in love: Gender differences in close heterosexual relationships. In V. E. O’Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 257–292). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. I. (2007). What is sex and why does it matter? A motivational approach to exploring individuals’ definitions of sex. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 256–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. (1996). The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, S. A., & Reinisch, J. M. (1999). Would you say “Had sex” if…? Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 275–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vassar, M., & Crosby, J. W. (2008). A reliability generalization study of coefficient alpha for the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 601–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, S. J., & Solomon, L. J. (1995). Barriers to condom use among male and female college students. Journal of American College Health, 44, 105–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions of women. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 539–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Education and Counseling Psychology Department, College of Education, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA

    Jesse Owen

  2. Family Institute, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    Frank D. Fincham

Authors
  1. Jesse Owen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank D. Fincham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse Owen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Owen, J., Fincham, F.D. Young Adults’ Emotional Reactions After Hooking Up Encounters. Arch Sex Behav 40, 321–330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation