Skip to main content
Log in

Book Review

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barth E. M., Krabbe E. C. W. 1982. From Axiom to Dialogue. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair J. A. 1998. The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument. In: Hansen H. V., Tindale C. W., Coleman A. V. (eds) Argumentation and Rhetoric. St. Catharines: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. CD-ROM. ISBN 0-9683461-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Finocchiaro Maurice A. 1980. Galileo and the Art of Reasoning: Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method. Boston: Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman J. B. 1991. Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments. New York: Foris

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A. I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Clarendon

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R. H. 2000. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rees A. M. 2001. Review of Johnson’s Manifest Rationality. Argumentation 15:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snoeck Henckemans A. F. 1992. Analyzing Complex Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton D. N. 1996. Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Pinto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinto, R.C. Book Review. Argumentation 21, 93–100 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9021-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9021-7

Navigation