Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficacy of the new repellent BioUD® against three species of ixodid ticks

  • Published:
Experimental and Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BioUD® with the active ingredient 2-undecanone originally derived from wild tomato plants is a new repellent recently registered by the US EPA. Repellent efficacy of BioUD® (7.75% 2-undecanone) and DEET (98.11%) was examined in the laboratory using a choice test between repellent-treated and control filter paper surfaces for Amblyomma americanum, Dermacentor variabilis, and Ixodes scapularis. BioUD® provided greater repellency against A. americanum and I. scapularis than DEET. No difference was found between BioUD® and DEET against D. variabilis. In head-to-head assays between BioUD® and DEET, undiluted and 50% dilutions of BioUD® were more repellent than undiluted DEET against all three species tested. Similarly, a 25% dilution of BioUD® was more repellent than DEET against A. americanum while no difference in mean percentage repellency was found between a 25% dilution of BioUD® and DEET against I. scapularis. Based on regression analysis, the concentration of BioUD® required for equivalent repellency to 98.11% DEET was 39.5% for D. variabilis and 29.7% for I. scapularis. A log-probit model could not be constructed for A. americanum from the dosages tested. Based on filter paper head-to-head assays, BioUD® is at least 2–4 times more active as a repellent than DEET against three species of ixodid ticks under the conditions of our laboratory bioassays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aquino M, Fyfe M, MacDougall L, Remple V (2004) West Nile virus in British Columbia. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1499–1501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard DR (1999) Repellency of essential oils to mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 36:625–629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demma LJ, Trager MS, Nicholson WL, Paddock CD, Blau DM, Eremeeva ME, Dasch GA, Levin ML, Singleton J, Zaki SR, Cheek JE, Swerdlow DL, McQuiston JH (2005) Rocky Mountain spotted fever from an unexpected tick vector in Arizona. N Engl J Med 353:587–594. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa050043

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumler JS, Barbet AF, Bekker CPJ, Dasch GA, Palmer GH, Ray SC, Rikihisa Y, Rurangirwa FR (2001) Reorganization of the genera of the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, descriptions of six new combinations and designations of Ehrlichia equi and ‘HGE agent’ as subjective synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:2145–2165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans SR, Korch GW Jr, Lawson MA (1990) Comparative field evaluation of permethrin and DEET-treated military uniforms for personal protection against ticks (Acari). J Med Entomol 27:829–834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farrar RR, Kennedy GG (1987) 2-Undecanone, a constituent of the glandular trichomes of Lycopersicon hirsutum f. glabratum: Effects on Heliothis zea and Manduca sexta growth and survival. Entomol Exp Appl 43:17–23. doi:10.1007/BF00350369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fradin MS, Day JF (2002) Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. N Engl J Med 347:13–18. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa011699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frances SP (2007) Efficacy and safety of products containing DEET. In: Debboun M, Frances S, Strickman D (eds) Insect repellents: principles, methods, and uses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 311–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayle A, Ringdahl E (2001) Tick-borne diseases. Am Fam Physician 64:461–466

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerberg EJ, Novak RJ (2007) Considerations on the use of botanically-derived repellent products. In: Debboun M, Frances S, Strickman D (eds) Insect repellents: principles, methods, and uses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Isman MB (2006) Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annu Rev Entomol 51:45–66. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenson TGT, Pålsson K, Borg-Karlson A-K (2005) Evaluation of extracts and oils of tick-repellent plants from Sweden. Med Vet Entomol 19:345–352. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.2005.00578.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenson TGT, Garboui S, Pålsson K (2006) Repellency of oils of lemon eucalyptus, geranium and lavender and the mosquito repellent MyggA Natural to Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) in the laboratory and field. J Med Entomol 43:731–736. doi:10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[731:ROOOLE]2.0.CO;2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy GG (2003) Tomato, pests, parasitoids, and predators: tritrophic interactions involving the genus Lycopersicon. Annu Rev Entomol 48:51–72. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lwande W, Ndakala AJ, Hassanali A, Moreka L, Nyandat E, Ndungu M, Amiani H, Gitu PM, Malonza MM, Punyua DK (1998) Gynandropsis gynandra essential oil and its constituents as tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) repellents. Phytochemistry 50:401–405. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00507-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SJ, Lenglet A, Hill N (2007) Plant-based insect repellents. In: Debboun M, Frances S, Strickman D (eds) Insect repellents: principles, methods, and uses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 276–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndungu M, Lwande W, Hassanali A, Moreka L, Chhabra SC (1995) Cleome monophylla essential oil and its constituents as tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) and maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais) repellents. Entomol Exp Appl 76:217–222. doi:10.1007/BF02382987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak RJ, Gerberg EJ (2005) Natural-based repellent products: efficacy for military and general public uses. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 21S:7–11. doi:10.2987/8756-971X(2005)21[7:NRPEFM]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JL, Preisler HK (1992) Pesticide bioassays with arthropods. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Salafsky B, He Y, Li J, Shibuya T, Ramaswamy K (2000) Short report: Study on the efficacy of a new long-lasting formulation of N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) for the prevention of tick attachment. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62:169–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2000–2004) SAS 9.1.3 Help and Documentation, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc

  • Schreck CE, Fish D, McGovern TP (1995) Activity of repellents applied to skin for protection against Amblyomma americanum and Ixodes scapularis ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). J Am Mosq Control Assoc 11:136–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg VB, Klein TA, McPherson KR, Bradford BA, Burge JR, Wirtz RA (1995) Field evaluation of DEET and a piperidine repellent (AI3–37220) against Amblyomma americanum. J Med Entomol 32:870–875

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshine DE (1993) Biology of ticks, vol 2. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshine DE, Lane RS, Nicholson WL (2002) Ticks (Ixodida). In: Mullen G, Durden L (eds) Medical and Veterinary Entomology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 517–558

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spach DH, Liles WC, Campbell GL, Quick RE, Anderson DE, Fritsche TR (1993) Tick-borne diseases in the United States. N Engl J Med 329:936–947. doi:10.1056/NEJM199309233291308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsell W, Mikiver A, Tunón H (2006) Repelling properties of some plant materials on the tick Ixodes ricinus L. Phytomedicine 13:132–134. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2004.04.008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tunón H, Thorsell W, Mikiver A, Malander I (2006) Arthropod repellency, especially tick (Ixodes ricinus), exerted by extract from Artemisia abrotanum and essential oil from flowers of Dianthus caryophyllum. Fitoterapia 77:257–261. doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2006.02.009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Centers for Disease Control (2004) DEET (N,N-Diethyl-meta-toluamide) chemical technical summary for public health and public safety professionals. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/consultations/deet/relevance.html. Accessed 9 Jul 2008

  • United States Centers for Disease Control (2005) Rocky Mountain spotted fever. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/rmsf/prevention.htm. Accessed 9 Jul 2008

  • Varela AS, Moore VA, Little SE (2004) Disease agents in Amblyomma americanum from northeastern Georgia. J Med Entomol 41:753–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Witting-Bissinger BE, Stumpf CF, Donohue KV, Apperson CS, Roe RM (2008) Novel arthropod repellent, BioUD, is an efficacious alternative to DEET. J Med Entomol 45:891–898. doi:10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[891:NARBIA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP, Bailey WD, Roe RM (2003) Spinosad selection of a laboratory strain of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and characterization of resistance. Crop Prot 22:265–273. doi:10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00147-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Consuelo Arellano (Department of Statistics, NCSU) for help in data analysis, Michael Bissinger (Department of Art and Design, NCSU) for assistance in figure preparation, and Jiwei Zhu for collecting ticks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7647, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613, USA

    B. W. Bissinger, C. S. Apperson, D. W. Watson & R. M. Roe

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529-0266, USA

    D. E. Sonenshine

Authors
  1. B. W. Bissinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. S. Apperson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. E. Sonenshine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. W. Watson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. M. Roe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. M. Roe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bissinger, B.W., Apperson, C.S., Sonenshine, D.E. et al. Efficacy of the new repellent BioUD® against three species of ixodid ticks. Exp Appl Acarol 48, 239–250 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9235-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9235-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation