Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A social network analysis of leading semiconductor companies’ knowledge flow network

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study (1) constructs a knowledge flow network for leading semiconductor companies; (2) seeks out how leading semiconductor companies can attain knowledge competencies (through patent activities or network position) via social network analysis; and (3) proposes critical strategic suggestions regarding knowledge flow networks in the industry. The results show (1) that a knowledge flow network with no isolators and Asian semiconductor firms are closely connected with other firms all over the world; (2) that patent activities are positively associated with central network positions and firm performance; (3) that closeness centrality is helpful for patent citation activities and also helps to achieve better performance; and (4) that semiconductor companies in Asia are also closely connected with others in the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. 2002. Social capital: Prospect for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27: 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 7: 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. 1997. The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation. Small Business Economics, 9: 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, C., & Hage, J. 1993. Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. 2000. In search of centre of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40: 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., & Pahlberg, C. 1997. Subsidiary influence and strategic behavior in MNCs: An empirical study. International Business Review, 3: 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B. 2003. Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: A longitudinal study. Organization Studies, 24: 535–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J., Shipilov, A., & Rowley, T. 2003. Where do small worlds come from?. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 597–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Ridderstrale, J. 1999. Fighting the corporate immune system: A process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations. International Business Review, 8: 149–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Li, L. 2004. Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: The impact of headquarters control mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. 2003. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49: 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. 2002. UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard Analytic Technologies, http://www.analytictech.com/downloaduc6.htm.

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, C. P. 2003. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29: 991–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 518–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. 1993. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 44–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. 2004. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitzman, A. F., & Mogee, M. E. 2002. The many applications of patent analysis. Journal of Information Science, 28: 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. 1992. Structural holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administration Science Quarterly, 42: 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. 2001. Structural holes vs. network closure as social capital. In N. Lin, K. S. Cook & R. S. Burt (Eds.). Social capital theory and research: 31–56. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A. 1995. The globalization of technology: What remains of the product cycle model?. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19: 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. 1988. Free riders and zealots: The role of social networks. Sociology Theory, 6: 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., & Cummings, J. 2004. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 928–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. T., & Homse, E. 1986. Controlling the marketing-purchasing interface: Resource development and organisational implications. Industrial Marketing and Purchasing, l: 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. F., Yoo, M., & Baker, W. E. 2003. The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organization, 1: 301–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguet, E., & MacGarvie, M. 2005. How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14: 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, P. 2000. Social ties and foreign market entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 31: 443–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, P., & Pecotich, A. 2001. Social factors influencing export initiation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Marketing Research, 38: 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. 1999. Accounting for the strength of MNC subsidiaries of the foreign-owned firms in Denmark. International Business Review, 2: 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: A conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1: 211–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, T. S. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner. 2009. Market share analysis: Preliminary total semiconductor revenue, worldwide, 2009. Stamford, CT: Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. 1992. Group performance and inter group relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.). Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology, Vol. 3. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California, Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. 2002. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13: 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S., & Wheeler, C. 2005. Entrepreneurs’ relationships for internationalization: Functions, origins and strategies. International Business Review, 14: 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, U., & Fratocchi, L. 1998. Centres of excellence in the international firm. In J. Birkinshaw & N. Hood (Eds.). Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development: 189–209. London: Mcmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. 2005. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30: 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 1999. International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8: 105–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 2002. Patent, citations and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, T., & Fogarty, M. 2000. The meaning of patent citations: Report of the NBER/Case Western Reserve survey of patentees. NBER working paper no. 7631, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L. A. 1998. Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China’s transition economy. American Journal of Sociology, 104: 404–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. 2001. Changing organizations: Business networks in the new political economy. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Walker, G. 2001. The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. American Sociological Review, 66: 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1996. What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science, 7: 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 342–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. 1988. Informal networks and organizational crisis: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51: 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labianca, G., & Brass, D. J. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31: 596–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. 2001. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R., Gerlach, M., & Ahmadjian, C. L. 1996. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. American Sociological Review, 61: 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Chen, M. 1997. Does guanxi influence firm performance?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 14(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, R., Gnyawali, D., & He, J. 2004. Two’s company, three’s crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 918–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merges, R. P., & Nelson, R. R. 1990. On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review, 90: 839–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. 2000. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29: 409–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNE. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. 2009. Professional guilds, tension and knowledge management. Research Policy, 38: 736–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. 1997. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26: 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H., Chung, M. H., & Labianca, G. 2004. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 860–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papa, M. J. 1990. Communication network patterns and employee performance with new technology. Communication Research, 17: 344–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papakyriazis, N. V., & Boudourides, M. A. 2001. Electronic weak ties in network organizations. Paper presented at the 4th German Online Research 2Conference, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, May.

  • Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro–macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. Q. 2005. How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(4): 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. 1993. A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 829–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. 1997. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62: 673–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. A., Single, H. M., & Lloyd, K. R. 1996. Focus groups in mental health research: Enhancing the validity of user and provider questionnaires. International Journal of Social Psychology, 42: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. 1995. A preliminary theory of network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. Networks, diversity and performance: The social capital of R&D teams. Organization Science, 12: 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. 2004. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 101–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. 2000. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative innovation and the patent law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A. B. 1964. Time in stratigraphy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. S., & Baum, J. A. C. 2002. Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 791–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. 2007. Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. 2004. Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 893–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stople, M. 2002. Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: The case of liquid crystal display technology. Research Policy, 3: 1181–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 315–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. 1977. Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technology know-how. Economic Journal, 242–261.

  • Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. 1997. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5: 19–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizatinoal networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 996–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. 2005. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111: 447–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. 1986. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11: 801–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J. 1999. Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randoms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. 1998. Collective dynamics of “small world” networks. Nature, 393: 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. 1988. Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, M., & Otto, J. 2004. Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovative performance. Journal of International Management, 10: 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U., & Kogut, B. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6: 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Business, Tamkang University, No.151, Yingzhuan Rd., Danshui Dist., New Taipei City, 25137, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Yvonne Ho

  2. Department of International Business, National Taiwan University, No.1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City, 106, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Hongjen Chiu

Authors
  1. Yvonne Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongjen Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvonne Ho.

Additional information

The authors wish to thank Editor-in-Chief Emeritus Mike Peng for his guidance in improving this manuscript, and Managing Editor Rae Pinkham for her editorial assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, Y., Chiu, H. A social network analysis of leading semiconductor companies’ knowledge flow network. Asia Pac J Manag 30, 1265–1283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9268-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9268-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation