Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Advancing the Science of Implementation: A Workshop Summary

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While much has been written about reducing the gap between science and practice, relatively little progress has been made to develop a sound knowledge base underlying implementation of effective interventions. To respond to these challenges, the National Institute of Mental Health organized a workshop entitled, “Advancing the Science of Implementation: Improving the Fit between Mental Health Intervention Development and Service Systems.” Over the 2-day workshop, a multi-disciplinary group of intervention and services researchers, implementers, methodologists, organizational theorists, and clinicians was brought together in an “engaged scholarship” * format composed of small and large-group settings to discuss the development of a sound knowledge base on the implementation of evidence-based practices. Using three specific intervention categories, participants identified constructs seen to be important to the implementation of the model in real-world systems. Following each breakout session, attendees reconvened for a full group discussion and brief presentations were conducted to highlight interventions in the areas of organizational measures, social network analysis and field opportunities. This summary describes some of the constructs relevant to implementation research and presents research questions that, if studied, will lay a solid foundation for implementation research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of medical informatics (pp. 65–70). Stuttgart: Schattauer.

  • Chambers, D. A. (2007). Disseminating and implementing evidence-based practices for mental health. In M. Welch-Ross & L. Fasig (Eds.), Handbook on communicating and disseminating behavioral science. New York: Sage.

  • Fitzgerald, L., Ferlie, E., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (1999). Evidence into practice? An exploratory analysis of the interpretation of evidence. In A. Mark & S. Dopson (Eds.), Organisational behaviour in health care. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blasé, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C. (2002). The organizational context of children’s mental health services. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5(4), 233–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, E. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, D. H., Sainfort, F., Eichler, M., Adams, L., Bisognano, M., & Steudel, H. (2003). Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change. Health Services Research, 38(2), 751–776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huby, G., & Fairhurst, K. (1998). How do general practitioners use evidence? A study in the context of Lothian health policy and practitioners’ use of statin drugs. Final report to CSO, August, 1998. Edinburgh: Primary Care Research Group, Department of General Practice, The University of Edinburgh.

  • Jones, L., & Wells, K. B. (2007). Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. JAMA, 297, 407–410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. & Cook, J. M. (2007). Organizational measurement and the implementation of innovations in mental health services. AMHP & MHSR.

  • Mendel, P., Meredity, L. S., Schoenbaum, M., Sherbourne, C. D., & Wells, K. B. (2007). Interventions in organizational and community context: A framework of dissemination in health services research. AMHP & MHSR.

  • National Advisory Mental Health Council’s Workgroup on Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology. (2006). The road ahead: Research partnerships to transform services. Accessed on the web at: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/roadahead.pdf Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health.

  • National Advisory Mental Health Council. (1999). Bridging science and service: A report by the National Advisory Mental Health Council’s Clinical Treatment and Services Research Workgroup. (NIH Publication No. 99-4353). Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIH (2006). Program annoucement (PAR-07-086) Dissemination and implementation research in health (R01). Accessed on February 22, 2007 at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/pa-files/PAR-07–086.html.

  • President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Final Report. (DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832). Rockville, MD.

  • Quinn, R. E., Hildebrant, H. W., Rogers, P. S., & Thompson, M. P. (1991). A competing values framework for analyzing presentational communication in management contexts. Journal of Business Communication, 28(3), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, & Johnson (2005). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1995). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J. R., Sandler, I. N., & Durlak, J. A. (2005). Promoting and protecting youth mental health through evidence-based prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 60(6), 628–648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D., & Bradley, R. (2005). Empirically supported complexity: Rethinking evidence-based practice in psychotherapy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 266–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. J. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 631–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Chambers.

Additional information

Please do not cite without permission of authors.

Appendix: Meeting Participants

Appendix: Meeting Participants

Nonfederal participants included: Jeffrey Alexander, University of Michigan; Thomas Belin, University of California-Los Angeles; John Bennett, Adapt of Texas; Leonard Bickman, Vanderbilt University; Esther Deblinger, UMDNJ; Naihua Duan, University of California-Los Angeles; Steven Gill, Southern Regional Area Health Education Center; Kevin Gully, Intermountain West Healthcare; Amy Herschell, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic; Megan Johnson, University of Washington; John Kimberly, University of Pennsylvania; David Kolko, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic; Isabel Lagomasino, University of Southern California; Richard McKasson, Adult and Child Mental Health Center, Inc.; Peter Mendel, RAND; Amy Oxman, Primary Children’s Medical Center for Safe and Healthy Families; Charles Rapp, University of Kansas; Michelle Salyers, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis; Pri Shah, University of Minnesota; Madhukar Trivedi, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Andrew Van de Ven, University of Minnesota; Kenneth Wells, University of California-Los Angeles/RAND.

Federal participants from the National Institute of Mental Health included: David Chambers, Junius Gonzales, Denise Juliano-Bult, Ann Hohmann, Carmen Moten, Karen Anderson Oliver, Heather Ringeisen, Agnes Rupp, Joel Sherrill, and Keisha Shropshire. Other federal participations: Edward Maibach, National Cancer Institute; Beverly Pringle, National Institute on Drug Abuse; Jack Stein, National Institute on Drug Abuse. All affiliations refer to active positions at the time of the meeting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chambers, D.A. Advancing the Science of Implementation: A Workshop Summary. Adm Policy Ment Health 35, 3–10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0146-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0146-7

Keywords

Navigation