Skip to main content
Log in

Quality Criteria Under Methodological Pluralism: Implications for Conducting and Evaluating Research

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Many community psychologists adhere to a methodological pluralist orientation to research; however, it is often unclear what such a position means in practice. This paper draws out the practical implications of methodological pluralism for community research. It proposes four sets of criteria for how research might be appraised under a pluralistic ethos: criteria applicable to all research, research-relevant community psychology values and principles, criteria specifically applicable to quantitative research, and criteria specifically applicable to qualitative research. The paper also addresses how pluralistic community research may be conducted, at each of three levels: integrating methods within a single study, using different approaches within a research program, and pluralism in the field as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albee, G. W. (1986). Toward a just society: Lessons from observations on the primary prevention of psychopathology. American Psychologist, 41, 891–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, C., Pistrang, N., & Elliott, R. (2002). Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G., Wright, H. F., Schoggen, M. F., & Barker, L. S. (1978). Habitats, environments, and human behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1976). The judged, not the judges: An insider’s view of mental retardation. American Psychologist, 31, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, E. A. (1999). Grounded theory analysis of emotional pain. Psychotherapy Research, 9, 342–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, L. A., Belenky, M. F., & Weinstock, J. S. (2000). The Listening Partners program: An initiative toward feminist community psychology in action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 697–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, E. (1991). In pursuit of wellness. American Psychologist, 46, 404–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, E. (1994). The enhancement of psychological wellness: challenges and opportunities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 149–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver-Linn, E. (2003). Where is psychology going? Structural fault lines revealed by psychologists’ use of Kuhn. American Psychologist, 58, 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1998). Editor’s introduction: A guide to the empirically-supported treatments controversy. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (2000). Rigor in psychotherapy research: The search for appropriate methodologies. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toledo.

  • Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, G. W., & Davidson, W. S., II. (1986). Introduction to community experimentation: Theory, methods, and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, D. W., & Shweder, R. A. (Eds.) (1986). Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D., & Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.) (1997). Critical psychology: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, D., & Fagan, R. (2003). Toward a critical community psychological perspective on unemployment and mental health. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. (1972). Companionship therapy: Studies in structured intimacy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazel, K. L., & Onaga, E. (2003). Experimental Social Innovation and Dissemination: the promise and its delivery. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, K. (2000). Community narratives and personal stories in Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 495–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, K., & Moos, R. H. (2001). Can encouraging substance abuse patients to participate in self-help groups reduce demand for health care? A quasi-experimental study. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25, 711–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jason, L., Davis, M. I., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Keys, C. B, Taylor, R. R., Isenberg, D. H., & Durlak, J. A. (2004). Conclusion. In L. Jason, C. B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. R. Taylor, & M. I. Davis, (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action (pp. 241–245). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G. (1990). Changing contexts and the field of community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 769–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G. (2003). Science and community psychology: Social norms for pluralistic enquiry. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhout, R. D. (2003). Reconceptualizing quantitative and qualitative methods: A case study dealing with place as an exemplar. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I., Hrabowski, F. A., & Grelf, G. L. (1998). Preparing the way: A qualitative study of high-achieving African American males and the role of the family. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 639–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (2003). Social contexts: Transcending their power and their fragility. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 362–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J. (1992). Community psychology: Theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistrang, N., & Barker, C. (1998). Partners and fellow patients: Two sources of emotional support for women with breast cancer. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 439–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistrang, N., Picciotto, A., & Barker, C. (2001). The communication of empathy in couples during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 615–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponterrotto, J. G., & Grieger, I. (1999). Merging qualitative and quantitative perspectives in a research identity. In M. Koppala & L. A. Suzuki (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in psychology (pp. 49–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (2001). Value based praxis in community psychology: Moving toward social justice and social action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 747–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primavera, J., & Brodsky, A. E. (2004). Processes of community research and action [Special issue]. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(3/4).

  • Rappaport, J. (1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods (pp. 51–63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. (2000). Against methodolatry: Some comments on Elliott, Fischer, and Rennie. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S., Reyes, O., Watts, R. W., Kelley, J. G., Shinn, M., Cherniss, C., Jason, L., & Trickett, E. (2004). Faculty deconstructs participatory research. In L. Jason, C. B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. R. Taylor, & M. I. Davis, (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action (pp. 233–238). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1955). Persons or science? A philosophical question. American Psychologist, 10, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosa, M. W., & Gonzales, N. A. (2000). Minority issues in prevention [Special issue]. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(2).

  • Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. London: Blond and Briggs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCRA (The Society for Community Research and Action) (n.d.). The SCRA mission. Retrieved December 1, 2003, from http://www.apa.org.org/divisions/div27/goals.html.

  • Solomon, M., Pistrang, N., & Barker, C. (2001). The benefits of mutual support groups for parents of children with disabilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steckler, A., McLeroy, K. R., Goodman, R. M., Bird, S. T., & McCormick, L. (1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C. H., & Wemmerus, V. A. (2001). Personal accounts of adults with schizophrenia, their parents, and well siblings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 725–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. T. (1999). Action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, C., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, C., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tebes, J. K., & Kraemer, D. T. (1991). Qualitative and quantitative knowing in mutual support research: some lessons from the recent history of scientific psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 739–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolan, P., Keys, C., Chertok, F., & Jason, L. (Eds.) (1990). Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J. (1996). A future for community psychology: the context of diversity and the diversity of contexts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A. (2003). Community science: Bridging the gap between science and practice with community-centered models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittemore, R., Case, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 522–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology and Health, 15, 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Barker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barker, C., Pistrang, N. Quality Criteria Under Methodological Pluralism: Implications for Conducting and Evaluating Research. Am J Community Psychol 35, 201–212 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-3398-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-3398-y

Keywords

Navigation