Skip to main content
Log in

An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems

  • Published:
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trust and reputation are central to effective interactions in open multi-agent systems (MAS) in which agents, that are owned by a variety of stakeholders, continuously enter and leave the system. This openness means existing trust and reputation models cannot readily be used since their performance suffers when there are various (unforseen) changes in the environment. To this end, this paper presents FIRE, a trust and reputation model that integrates a number of information sources to produce a comprehensive assessment of an agent’s likely performance in open systems. Specifically, FIRE incorporates interaction trust, role-based trust, witness reputation, and certified reputation to provide trust metrics in most circumstances. FIRE is empirically evaluated and is shown to help agents gain better utility (by effectively selecting appropriate interaction partners) than our benchmarks in a variety of agent populations. It is also shown that FIRE is able to effectively respond to changes that occur in an agent’s environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdul-Rahman, A., & Hailes, S. (2000). Supporting trust in virtual communities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Vol. 6., IEEE Computer Society Press.

  2. Amazon Site. (http://www.amazon.com) World Wide Web.

  3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American.

  4. Carbo J., Molina J.M. and Davila J. (2003). Trust management through fuzzy reputation. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 12(1): 135–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Castelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (2001). Social trust: A cognitive approach. In C. Castelfranchi, & Y. Tan, (Eds.), Trust and deception in virtual societies. (pp. 55–90). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  6. Cohen, P. R. (1995). Empirical methods for artificial intelligence. The MIT Press.

  7. Conte, R., & Paolucci, M. (2002). Reputation in artificial societies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  8. Dasgupta, P. (2000). Trust as a Commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Electronic edn. Department of Sociology, University of Oxford 49–72.

  9. DeGroot, M. H., & Schervish, M. J. (2002). Probability and statistics. Addison-Wesley.

  10. eBay Site. (http://www.ebay.com) World Wide Web.

  11. Foster I., Kesselman C. and Tuecke S. (2001). The anatomy of the grid: enabling scalable virtual organizations. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 15(3): 200–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gambetta, D. (2000). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Electronic edn. Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.

  13. Grandison, T., & Sloman, M. (2000). A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 3(4).

  14. Huynh, T. D., Jennings, N. R., & Shadbolt, N. R. (2004a). Developing an integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In R. Falcone, S. Barber, J. Sabater, & M. Singh, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on trust in agent societies (pp. 65–74).

  15. Huynh, T. D., Jennings, N. R., & Shadbolt, N. R. (2004b). FIRE: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the 16th European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI) (pp. 18–22).

  16. Jennings N. R. (2001). An agent-based approach for building complex software systems. Communications of the ACM 44(4): 35–41

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Jurca R. and Faltings B. (2003). Towards incentive-compatible reputation management. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S., Korba, L. and Singh, M. (eds) Trust, reputation and security: theories and practice. Vol. 2631 of Lecture Notes in AI, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 138–147

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaelbling L. P., Littman M. L. and Moore A. W. (1996). Reinforcement learning: A survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4: 237–285

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marsh, S. P. (1994). Formalising trust as a computational concept, PhD thesis, University of Stirling.

  20. Mass Y. and Shehory O. (2001). Distributed trust in open multi-agent systems. In: Falcone, R., Singh, M. and Tan, Y. (eds) Trust in cyber-societies, pp 159–173. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maximilien E. M. and Singh M. P. (2002). Reputation and endorsement for web services. ACM SIGEcom Exchanges 3(1): 24–31

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., & Halberstadt, A. (2002). A computational model of trust and reputation. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system science. (pp. 280–287).

  23. Ooi, B. C., Liau, C. Y., & Tan, K. L. (2003). Managing trust in peer-to-peer systems using reputation-based techniques. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference in advances in web-age information management (WAIM 2003). Vol. 2762 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2–12 Chengdu, China, August 17–19.

  24. Ramchurn S. D., Huynh T. D. and Jennings N. R. (2004). Trust in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 19(1): 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. In M. R. Baye, (Ed.), The economics of the internet and e-commerce. Vol. 11 of Advances in Applied Microeconomics. Elsevier Science.

  26. Sabater, J. (2003). Trust and Reputation for Agent Societies. PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

  27. Sabater, J., & Sierra, C. (2001). REGRET: A reputation model for gregarious societies. In Fourth workshop on deception fraud and trust in agent societies (pp. 61–70). Montreal, Canada.

  28. Saha D. and Mukherjee A. (2003). Pervasive computing: A paradigm for the 21st century. IEEE Computer 36(3): 25–31

    Google Scholar 

  29. Salton G. and McGill M. (1983). An introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schillo M., Rovatsos M. and Funk P. (2000). Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societies. Special Issue of the Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal on “Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies” 14(8): 825–848

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sen, S., & Sajja, N. (2002). Robustness of reputation-based trust: Boolean case. In Proceedings of the first intenational joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. Vol. 1. (pp. 288–293).

  32. Skogsrud H., Benatallah B. and Casati F. (2003). Model-driven trust negotiation for web services. IEEE Internet Computing 7(6): 45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Steinmetz, R., & Wehrle, K., (Eds.) (2005). Peer-to-peer systems and applications. Vol. 3485 of Lecture Notes on Computer Science, Springer Publishing.

  34. Teacy, W. T. L., Patel, J., Jennings, N. R., & Luck, M. (2005). Coping with inaccurate reputation sources: Experimental analysis of a probabilistic trust model. In proceedings of fourth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 997–1004).

  35. Uszok, A., Bradshaw, J. M., & Jeffers, R. (2004). KAoS: A policy and domain services framework for grid computing and semantic web services. In C. Jensen, S. Poslad, & T. Dimitrakos, (Eds.), Trust management: Second international conference, iTrust 2004, Oxford, UK, March 29–April 1, 2004. Proceedings. Vol. 2995 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., (pp. 16–26). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.

  36. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis : Methods and applications. Volume 8 of Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.

  37. Yolum, P., & Singh, M. P. (2004). Service graphs for building trust. In International conference on cooperative information systems (CoopIS). Vol. 3290 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 509–525).

  38. Yu, B., & Singh, M. P. (2002). An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In Proceedings of first international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Vol. 1. (pp. 294–301). ACM Press.

  39. Yu, B., & Singh, M. P. (2003). Searching social networks. In Proceedings of the second international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiAgent systems (AAMAS) (pp. 65–72). ACM Press.

  40. Zacharia G. and Maes P. (2000). Trust management through reputation mechanisms. Applied Artificial Intelligence 14(9): 881–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zimmermann P. R. (1995). The official PGP user’s guide. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trung Dong Huynh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huynh, T.D., Jennings, N.R. & Shadbolt, N.R. An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 13, 119–154 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-6825-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-6825-4

Keywords

Navigation