Abstract
In the midst of a rich environment for medical device development and manufacturing, universities can play a critical role by developing relevant training programs to produce entrepreneurs who can be efficient and successful in creating early stage companies by understanding deeply the issues involved in creating a useful device, how to raise money, designing early clinical studies and locating manufacturing partners.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Best, M. H., P. Ryan, S. Das, O. Tulum, and M. Giblin. Capabilities & competitiveness: A methodological approach for understanding Irish economic transformation. The Lucerna Project Report. 2010, Centre for Innovation and Structural Change, NUI Galway.
BioInnovate Ireland. www.bioinnovate.ie. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
Bowen, H. K., and C. Purrington. Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology (CIMIT) case study. Harvard Business Review, 2007. http://www.cimit.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
Brown, T. Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review 86(84–92):141, 2008.
Cassak, D. Israel’s device community: opportunities and challenges ahead. Medtech Insight 11(2), 2009.
Cassak, D. Ireland’s Medtech Explosion. In Vivo 29(8), 2011.
Centre for Technology in Medicine and Health. http://www.ctmh.se/. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
Dorf, R. C., and T. H. Byers. Technology Ventures: From Idea to Enterprise. San Francisco: McGraw Hill, 2005.
Fiet, J. O. The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 16:1–24, 2001.
Future Skills Needs of the Irish Medical Devices Sector: 2007–2013, 2008.
Innovation Task Force Report. Dublin, Ireland, 2010.
Irish Medical Device Asscoiation. www.imda.ie. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
Johns Hopkins University, Centre of Bioengineering Innovaion and Design. http://cbid.bme.jhu.edu/. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
Kelly, T. The Art of Innovation. New York: Doubleday, 2001.
Pietzsch, J. B., M. E. Pate-Cornell, P. G. Yock, L. M. Aquino, and J. H. Linehan. Stage-gate process for the development of medical devices. J. Med. Devices 021004-1–021004-15, 2009.
Stanford Bodesign. http://biodesign.stanford.edu/bdn/index.jsp. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
Ten Years On. Confirming impacts from research investment: a case study focusing on the direct commercial and economic impacts from exchequer investment into centres and initiatives supported by the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions (PRTLI), 2000–2006.
Wallace H. Coulter Founation. http://www.whcf.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2012
Yock, P. G., T. J. Brinton, and S. A. Zenios. Teaching biomedical technology innovation as a discipline. Sci. Transl. Med. 3(92):1–5, 2012.
Zenios, S., J. Makower, and P. Yock. Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Acknowledgments
M. S. Bruzzi is the program Director of BioInnovate Ireland. J. H. Linehan has been an advisor from the conception of the program and is currently a member of the BioInnovate Advisory Board. BioInnovate Ireland is a partnership between the National University of Ireland Galway, University of Limerick, University College Cork and Dublin City University. The program is supported by Enterprise Ireland, the Irish Medical Device Association and industry sponsors acknowledged in www.bioinnovate.ie.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Andrew DiMeo oversaw the review of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruzzi, M.S., Linehan, J.H. BioInnovate Ireland—Fostering Entrepreneurial Activity Through Medical Device Innovation Training. Ann Biomed Eng 41, 1834–1840 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0787-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0787-5