Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate debt and financial balance sheet adjustment: a comparison of the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Annals of Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The level of UK corporate debt directly affects financial stability in the United Kingdom because a significant amount of the exposure of the UK financial system is to UK corporates. Our paper provides a comparison of the determinants of corporate debt in the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany. The comparison serves to benchmark our findings about the determinants of UK corporate debt. In addition, the UK financial sector is significantly exposed to the corporate sectors in the United States, Germany and France. The model assesses the contribution of investment, acquisitions, cash flows and market-to-book values to the determination of debt, and also the tendency of debt to revert to its optimum level. Debt was found to be positively related to the financing needs of the firm, and the optimum level of debt to be negatively related to the market-to-book ratio. This casts some light on the procyclicality of debt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antoniou A., Guney Y., Paudyal K.: Determinants of corporate capital structure: evidence from European countries. University of Durham Business School, Working Paper, Durham (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou A., Guney Y., Paudyal K.: The determinants of corporate capital structure: capital market-oriented versus bank-oriented institutions. J Financ Quant Anal 43, 59–92 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou A., Guney Y., Paudyal K.: The determinants of debt maturity structure: evidence from France, Germany and the UK. Eur Financ Manag 12, 161–194 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M., Bond S.: Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58, 277–297 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M., Bover O.: Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components model. J Econom 68, 29–51 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arulampalam W.: A note on estimated coefficients in random effects probit models. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(4), 597–602 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay M., Smith C., Watts R.: The determinants of corporate leverage and dividend policies. J Appl Corp Financ 7(4), 4–19 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito, A., Young, G.: Financial pressure and balance sheet adjustment by UK firms. Bank of England Working Paper no. 168 (2002)

  • Bernanke B., Gertler M.: Financial fragility and economic performance. Q J Econ 105, 87–114 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R., Bond S.: Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87, 115–143 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R., Bond S., Devereux M., Schiantarelli F.: Investment and Tobin’s Q. J Econom 51, 233–257 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris C.W., Himmelberg C.P., Wachtel P.: Commercial paper, corporate finance, and the business cycle: a microeconomic perspective. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 42, 203–250 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J.R., De Nardi M.: A conversation with 590 nascent entrepreneurs. Ann Financ 5, 313–340 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nardi M., Villamil A.: Entrepreneurship, finance and employment. Ann Financ 5, 289–293 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doornik, J.A., Arellano, M., Bond, S.: Panel data estimation using DPD for OX, Unpublished. Available at http://www.doornik.com/research.html (1999)

  • Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J.: Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55, 251–276 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E., French K.: Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Rev Financ Stud 15(1), 1–33 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friderichs, H., Paranque, B., Sauve, A.: Structures of corporate finance in Germany and France: a comparative analysis for West German and French incorporated enterprises with special reference to institutional factors. In: Sauve, A., Scheuer, M. (eds.), Corporate finance in Germany and France. Working Papers—Yale School of Management’s Economics Research Network (1999)

  • Gomes, A., Phillips, G.: Why do public firms issue private and public securities? NBER Working Paper 11294, April (2005)

  • Guilkey D.K., Murphy J.L.: Estimation and testing in the random effects probit model. J Econom 59, 301–317 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison R., Nikolov K., Quinn M., Ramsey G., Scott A., Thomas R.: The Bank of England Quarterly Model. Bank of England, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry D.F.: Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herranz N., Krasa S., Villamil A.P.: Small firms in the SSBF. Ann Financ 5, 341–359 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang R., Ritter J.R.: Testing theories of capital structure and estimating the speed of adjustment. J Financ Quant Anal 44, 237–271 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M.: Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76, 323–329 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W.: Law and finance. J Polit Econ 106, 113–1155 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Margi S.: The financing of small entrepreneurs in Italy. Ann Financ 5, 397–419 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers S.: Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ 5, 147–175 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers S., Majluf N.: Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financ Econ 13, 187–221 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan R., Zingales L.: What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. J Financ 50, 1421–1460 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyam-Sunder L., Myers S.: Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. J Financ Econ 51, 219–244 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, I.: Columbus’ egg: the real determinant of capital structure. NBER Working Paper no. 8782 (2002)

  • Welch I.: Capital structure and stock returns. J Polit Econ 112(1), 106–131 (Part 1) (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Stevens.

Additional information

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the Bank of England. This paper was completed while P. Gibbard was at the Bank of England.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibbard, P., Stevens, I. Corporate debt and financial balance sheet adjustment: a comparison of the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany. Ann Finance 7, 95–118 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-010-0146-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-010-0146-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation