Abstract
Although light is a key factor in forestry, it is surprisingly seldom measured in day-to-day management of European forests. The spherical convex densiometer is a simple instrument that allows to evaluate the canopy openness (CO) by counting the number of ‘canopy’ dots on a grid lying on a convex mirror reflecting the canopy. In this contribution, we compared the performances of this instrument in mixed oak–beech hardwood forests spanning the lower end of the light gradient [1–17 % above canopy photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)] to two reference techniques: PAR measurements and fish-eye photography, based on a detailed analysis of its functioning. Discrepancies between the densiometer and the fish-eye estimates of CO were due to a combination of differences in dot resolution, dot counting and portion of the hemisphere considered. By contrast, the various effects of operator on densiometer estimates, including the influence of conformation on the angle of view, were found to be relatively minor. Densiometer readings were closely related to the relative light intensity assessed by PAR sensors in overcast conditions, which suggests that the use of this inexpensive tool should be expanded.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Augusto L, Ranger J, Binkley D, Rothe A (2002) Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann For Sci 59:233–253
Baudry O, Charmetant C, Ponette Q (2010) Le climat lumineux en forêt et quelques outils d’estimation. Forêt Wallonne 107:42–54
Beaudet M, Messier C (1998) Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient. Can J For Res 28:1007–1015
Bellow JG, Nair PKR (2002) Comparing common methods for assessing understory light availability in shaded-perennial agroforestry system. Agric For Meteorol 144:197–211
Bertin S, Palmroth S, Kim HS, Perks MP, Mencuccini M, Oren R (2011) Modelling understory light for seedling regeneration in continuous cover forestry canopies. Forestry 84:397–409
Brown N, Jennings S, Wheeler P, Nabe-Nielsen J (2000) An improved method for the rapid assessment of forest understorey light environments. J Appl Ecol 37:1044–1053
Claveau Y, Messier C, Comeau PG, Coates KD (2002) Growth and crown morphological responses of boreal conifer seedlings and saplings with contrasting shade tolerance to a gradient of light and height. Can J For Res 32:458–468
Collet C, Chenost C (2006) Using competition and light estimates to predict diameter and height growth of naturally regenerated beech seedlings growing under changing canopy conditions. Forestry 79:489–502
Comeau PG, Heineman JL (2003) Predicting understory light microclimate from stand parameters in young paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) stands. For Ecol Manage 180:303–315
Comeau PG, Gendron F, Letchford T (1998) A comparison of several methods for estimating light under a paper birch mixedwood stand. Can J For Res 28:1843–1850
Cook JG, Stutzman TW, Bowers CW, Brenner KA, Irwin LL (1995) Spherical densiometers produces biased estimates of forest canopy cover. Widlife Soc Bull 23(4):711–717
Emborg J (1998) Understorey light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of a near-natural deciduous forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manag 106:83–95
Englund SR, O’Brien JJ, Clarck DB (2000) Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. Can J For Res 30:1999–2005
Ferment A, Picard N, Gourlet-Fleury S, Baraloto C (2001) A comparison of five indirect methods for characterizing the light environment in a tropical forest. Ann For Sci 58:877–891
Fiala A, Garman SL, Gray AN (2006) Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades. For Ecol Manage 232:188–197
Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP (1999) Gap Light Analyzer (GLA): imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, pp 36
Gaudio N, Balandier Ph, Dumas Y, Ginisty Ch (2011) Growth and morphology of three forest understorey species (Calluna vulgaris, Molinia caerulea and Pteridium aquilinum) according to light availability. For Ecol Manage 261(3):489–498
Gayer K (1882) Der Waldbau. Verlag von Paul Parey, Belin, p 592
Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D (1999) Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry 72:59–73
Kobe RK (2006) Sapling growth as a function of light and landscape-level variation in soil water and foliar nitrogen in northern Michigan. Oecologia 147:119–133
Kobe RK, Hogarth LJ (2007) Evaluation of irradiance metrics with respect to predicting sapling growth. Can J For Res 37:1203–1213
Kobe RK, Pacala S, Silander J, Canham C (1995) Juvenile tree survivorship as a component of shade tolerance. Ecol Appl 5:517–532
Korhonen L, Korhonen KT, Rautainen M, Stenberg P (2006) Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques. Silva Fennica 40(2):577–588
Lemmon PE (1956) A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory density. Ecology 2:314–320
Lhotka JM, Loewenstein EF (2006) Indirect measures for characterizing light along a gradient of mixed-hardwood riparian forest canopy structures. For Ecol Manage 226:310–318
Lieffers VJ, Messier C, Stadt KJ, Gendron F, Comeau PG (1999) Predicting and managing light in the understory of boreal forests. Can J For Res 29(6):796–811
Lorentz M, Parade A (1860) Cours élémentaire de culture des bois. Bouchard-Huzard, Nancy, p 699
Machado JL, Reich PB (1999) Evaluation of several measures of canopy openness as predictors of photosynthetic photon flux density in deeply shaded conifer-dominated forest understory. Can J For Res 29(9):1438–1444
Martin PH, Canham CD, Kobe RK (2010) Divergence from the growth–survival trade-off and extreme high growth rates drive patterns of exotic tree invasions in closed-canopy forests. J Ecol 98(4):778–789
Mayer DG, Butler DG (1993) Statistical validation. Ecol Model 68(1–2):21–32
Messier C, Nikinmaa E (2000) Effects of light availability and sapling size on the growth, biomass allocation, and crown morphology of understory sugar maple, yellow birch, and beech. Ecoscience 7(3):345–356
Messier C, Doucet R, Ruel J-C, Claveau Y, Kelly C, Lechowicz MJ (1999) Functional ecology of advance regeneration in relation to light in boreal forests. Can J For Res 29(6):812–823
Paletto A, Tosi V (2009) Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: comparison of assessment techniques. Eur J For Res 128:265–272
Parent S, Messier C (1996) A simple and efficient method to estimate microsite light availability under a forest canopy. Can J For Res 26:151–154
Pommerening A, Murphy ST (2004) A review of the history, definitions and methods of continuous cover forestry with special attention to afforestation and restocking. Forestry 77(1):27–44
Poorter L (1999) Growth responses of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Funct Ecol 13:396–410
Poulson TL, Platt WJ (1989) Gap light regimes influence canopy tree diversity. Ecology 70:553–555
Pueschel P, Buddenbaum H, Hill J (2012) An efficient approach to standardizing the processing of hemispherical images for the estimation of forest structural attributes. Agric For Meteorol 160:1–13
Ritter E, Dalsgaard L, Einhorn KS (2005) Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manage 206:15–33
Strickler GS (1959) Use of the densiometer to estimate density of forest canopy on permanent sample plots. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest, Forest and Range Experiment Station. Portland, Oregon, p 5
Théry M (2001) Forest light and its influence on habitat selection. Plant Ecol 153:251–261
Vales DJ, Bunnell FL (1988) Comparison of methods for estimating forest overstory cover. 1 observer effects. Can J For Res 18:606–609
von Lüpke B (1998) Silvicultural methods of oak regeneration with special respect to shade tolerant mixed species. For Ecol Manage 106:19–26
Wagner S, Fischer H, Huth F (2011) Canopy effects on vegetation caused by harvesting and regeneration treatments. Eur J For Res 130(1):17–40
Acknowledgments
We thank all the technical staff of the Forest Sciences team, in particular Cédric Daine for invaluable field and laboratory assistance for the treatment of the fish-eye pictures. The authors show gratitude to the Université catholique de Louvain for the financial support of this study. We also wish to thank two anonymous reviewers who provided useful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Projet cofinancé par le Fonds européen de développement régional et par la Région wallonne dans le cadre du programme INTERREG IV-A Grande Région. «L’Union européenne investit dans votre avenir». Gefördert durch den Europäischen Fonds für regionale Entwicklung und die wallonische Region im Rahmen des Programms INTERREG IV-A Großregion. «Die Europäische Union investiert in Ihre Zukunft».
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by C. Ammer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baudry, O., Charmetant, C., Collet, C. et al. Estimating light climate in forest with the convex densiometer: operator effect, geometry and relation to diffuse light. Eur J Forest Res 133, 101–110 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-013-0746-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-013-0746-6