Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of exurban development on bird species richness and diversity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exurban development is an accelerating land use trend in the United States with new housing units emerging in formerly closed forests. Conservation practitioners and planners suspect exurban development alters ecological processes and biodiversity to a considerable larger extent than suspected by inhabitants of exurban development areas, but empirical support for this assertion is lacking. To examine the consequences of exurban development, we studied forest bird communities in exurban development and forests located in and around Shenandoah National Park and Massanutten Mountain in northern Virginia, USA. We conducted point-count surveys for birds three times at 106 sample locations from April to July 2006. We recorded 44 species in total; 30 species were present in both exurban development and forests, 9 species were only found in exurban development, and 5 species only in forest. Bird species composition differed significantly between land-use types based on analysis in a multi-response permutation procedure (MRPP; P < 0.01). Relative bird abundance for forest specialist species changed significantly in exurban development versus forest (t test, P < 0.05). Three species, American Robin Turdus migratorius, Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis, and Common Grackle Quiscalus quiscula were indicators of exurban development. Indicators of forest were Carolina Chickadee Poecile carolinensis, Eastern Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus, and Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina. Our study demonstrates that exurban development alters bird community composition and relative abundance of forest specialist species.

Zusammenfassung

Exurbane Landentwicklung (engl.: exurban development) ist ein rasant zunehmender Landnutzungstyp in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika, bei dem Wohngebäude in zuvor geschlossenen und naturnahen Wäldern konstruiert werden. Naturschutzorganisationen und Landschaftsplaner vermuten, dass Exurbane Landentwicklung die ökologischen Prozesse und Biodiversität bedeutend verändern, allerdings fehlen bisher empirische Daten dies zu belegen. Um den Einfluss von Exurbaner Landentwicklung zu ermitteln, haben wir Vogelgemeinschaften in Exurbaner Landentwicklung mit Vogelgemeinschaften naturnaher Wälder im und um den Shenandoah Nationalpark und Massanutten Mountain im Norden des US Bundesstaates Virginia untersucht. An 106 Stellen wurden alle Vögel mit Punkt-Stopp-Zählungen insgesamt dreimal in der Zeit von April bis Juli 2006 aufgenommen. Insgesamt wurden 44 Arten erfasst; 30 Arten waren in beiden Habitattypen anzutreffen, während neun Arten nur in exurbaner Landentwicklung und fünf ausschließlich im naturnahen Wald anzutreffen waren. Die Zusammensetzung der Vogelgemeinschaft unterschied sich signifikant zwischen beiden Vogelgesellschaften (MRPP, P < 0.01). Ebenso änderte sich die Relative Abundanz für Waldvögel signifikant zwischen Exurbaner Landentwicklung und naturnahem Wald (t-test, P < 0.05; Exurbane Landentwicklung geht in der Regel aus naturnahem Wald hervor). Drei Arten, Turdus migratorius, Cardinalis cardinalis, und Quiscalus quiscula wurden als Indikatorarten für Exurbane Landentwicklung identifiziert, während Poecile carolinensis, Pipilo erythrophthalmicus, und Hylocichla mustelina als Indikatorarten für naturnahe Wälder gelten können. Die Studie belegt, dass Exurbane Landentwicklung die Vogelgemeinschaften in der Artenzusammensetzung und die relative Abundanz der Waldvogelarten deutlich beeinflusst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beissinger SR, Osborne DR (1982) Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1992) Bird census techniques. Neumann, Radebeul

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (2001) Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the US. In: Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (eds) Biotic homogenization. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 33–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair R, Johnson E (2008) Suburban habitats and their role for birds in the urban-rural habitat network: points of local invasion and extinction? Landsc Ecol 23:1157–1169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock CE, Jones ZF, Bock JH (2008) The oasis effect: response of birds to exurban development in a southwestern savanna. Ecol Appl 18:1093–1106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DG, Johnson KM, Oveland TR, Theobald DM (2005) Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecol Appl 15:1851–1863

    Google Scholar 

  • Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau P, Savard JPL, Mennechez G, Falardeau G (1998) Bird abundance and diversity along a urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100:413–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS, Temple SA, Craven SR (1997) Cats and wildlife: a conservation dilemma. http://www.fw.vt.edu/extension/fiw/wildlife/damage/Cats.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2010

  • Colwell RK (2006) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.00. User’s guide and application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates. Accessed 10 January 2010

  • Croci S, Butet A, Georges A, Aguejdad R, Clergeau P (2008) Small urban woodlands as biodiversity conservation hot-spot: a multi-taxon approach. Landsc Ecol 23:1171–1186

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Suarez AV, Bolger DT (2004) Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv 115:451–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Brown S, Haeuber RA, Hobbs NT, Huntly N, Naiman RJ, Riebsame WE, Turner MG, Valone TJ (2000) Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecol Appl 10:639–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale V, Archer S, Chang M, Ojima D (2005) Ecological impacts and mitigation strategies for rural land management. Ecol Appl 15:1879–1892

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels T (1999) When city and country collide: managing growth in the metropolitan fringe. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JT (1974) An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76:184–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle DM, Criner TL, Boren JC, Masters RE, Gregory MS (1999) Response of breeding birds in the Great Plains to low density urban sprawl. Gt Plains Res 9:55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans KL, Newson SE, Gaston KJ (2009) Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis 151:19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Jokimäki J (2001) A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodivers Conserv 10:2023–2043

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraterrigo JM, Wiens JA (2005) Bird communities of the Colorado Rocky Mountains along a gradient of exurban development. Landsc Urban Plan 71:263–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen LE, Eagles PFJ, Mackay RJ (1995) Effects of residential development on forest-dwelling neotropical migrant songbirds. Conserv Biol 9:1408–1414

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson J, Aggarwal A, Sarkar S (2002) Birds as surrogates for biodiversity: an analysis of a data set from Southern Quebec. J Biosci 27:347–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Germaine SS, Rosenstock SS, Schweinsburg RE, Richardson WS (1998) Relationships among breeding birds, habitat and residential development in Greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecol Appl 8:680–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies C, Clout M (2003) The prey of domestic cats (Felis catus) in two suburbs of Auckland city, New Zealand. J Zool Lond 259:309–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AJ, Rasker R, Maxwell B, Rotella JJ, Johnson JD, Wright Parmenter A, Langner U, Cohen WB, Lawrence RL, Kraska MPV (2002) Ecological causes and consequences of demographic change in the New West. Bioscience 52:151–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AJ, Knight RL, Marzluff JM, Powell S, Brown K, Gude PH, Jones K (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecol Appl 15:1893–1905

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines JE (2006) PRESENCE 2.4—Software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. USGS-PWRC. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html. Accessed 10 January 2010

  • Holmes RT, Sturges FW (1975) Bird community dynamics and energetics in a northern hardwoods ecosystem. J Anim Ecol 44:175–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer C, Huang C, Yang L, Wylie B, Coan M (2004) Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70:829–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Yang L, Wylie B, Homer C (2001) A strategy for estimating tree canopy density using Landsat 7 ETM+ and high resolution images over large areas: national land cover database mapping zone 60. Third International Conference on Geospatial Information in Agriculture and Forestry. Sioux Falls, SD, USA. CD-ROM, 1 disk. US Environmental Protection Agency, US Dept of Agriculture Forest Service (Forest Inventory and Analysis Program), USGS EROS Data Center

  • Jokimäki J, Huhta E (2000) Artificial nest predation and abundance of birds along an urban gradient. Condor 102:838–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki ML, Sorace A, Fernández-Juricic E, Rodriguez-Prieto I, Jimenez MD (2005) Evaluation of the ‘safe nesting zone’ hypothesis across an urban gradient: a multi-scale study. Ecography 28:59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingery HE (1998) Colorado breeding bird atlas. Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership and Colorado Division of Wildlife Denver, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluza DA, Griffin CR, Degraaf RM (2000) Housing developments in rural New England: effects on forest birds. Anim Conserv 3:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenth BA, Knight RL, Gilgert WC (2006) Conservation value of clustered housing developments. Conserv Biol 20:1445–1456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk CA, Flather CH, Radeloff VC, Pidgeon AM, Hammer RB, Liu JG (2008) Human impacts on regional avian diversity and abundance. Conserv Biol 22:405–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Luck GW (2003) Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421:530–533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luniak M (1994) The development of bird communities in new housing estates in Warsaw. Memorab Zool 49:257–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie DI, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Knutson MG, Franklin AB (2003) Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84:2200–2207

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, pp 19–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (2001) A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms and approaches. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer AL, Cameron GN (2003) Landscape characteristics, spatial extent, and breeding bird diversity in Ohio, USA. Divers Distrib 9:297–311

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre NE (1995) Effects of forest patch size on avian diversity. Landsc Ecol 10:85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merenlender AM, Reed SE, Heise KL (2009) Exurban development influences woodland bird composition. Landsc Urban Plan 92:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Wiens JA, Hobbs NT, Theobald DM (2003) Effects of human settlement on bird communities in lowland riparian areas of Colorado (USA). Ecol Appl 13:1041–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson AC (1992) Characterizing exurbia. J Plan Lit 6:350–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilon CH, Long CN, Zipperer WC (1995) Effects of wildland development on forest bird communities. Landsc Urban Plan 32:81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell EA, Knight RL (2001) Songbird and medium-sized mammal communities associated with exurban development in Pitkin County, Colorado. Conserv Biol 15:1143–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Alvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I (2009) Living in the big city: effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landsc Urban Plan 90:189–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomino D, Carrascal LM (2005) Birds on novel island environments: a case study with the urban avifauna of Tenerife (Canary Islands). Ecol Res 20:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Park CR, Lee WS (2000) Relationship between species composition and area in breeding birds of urban woods in Seoul, Korea. Landsc Urban Plan 51:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit DR, Petit L, Saab VA, Martin TE (1995) Fixed-radius point counts in forests. USDA For Serv Tech Rep 149:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole AE (2005) The birds of North America online. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/BNA/. Accessed 10 January 2010

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Voss PR, Hagen AE, Field DR, Mladenoff DJ (2001) Human demographic trends and landscape level forest management in the northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens. For Sci 47:229–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI (2005a) Rural and suburban sprawl in the US Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and its relation to forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol 19:793–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, Mckeefry JF (2005b) The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:799–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasker R, Hansen AJ (2000) Natural amenities and population growth in the Greater Yellowstone region. Hum Ecol Rev 7:30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner SC (2005) Biodiversity: there’s a role to be played by museum-keepers’ too. Nature 438:914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renner SC, Waltert M, Mühlenberg M (2006) Comparison of bird communities in primary versus young secondary tropical montane cloud forest in Guatemala. Biodivers Conserv 15:1545–1575

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth RR, Johnson MS, Underwood TJ (1996) Wood thrush (Hylocichla mustelina). The Birds of North America, no. 246. The Birds of North America, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallabanks R, James FC (1999) American Robin (Turdus migratorius). The Birds of North America, no. 462. The Birds of North America, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg J, Riera J, Turner MG, Voss PR (2002) Explaining human settlement patterns in a recreational lake district: Vilas County, Wisconsin, USA. Environ Manag 30:24–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Rubio M, Thomlinson JR (2009) Landscape and patch-level factors influence bird communities in an urbanized tropical island. Biol Conserv 142:1311–1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald DM (2001) Land use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geogr Rev 91:544–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald DM (2004) Placing exurban land-use change in a human modification framework. Front Ecol Environ 2:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald DM (2005) Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecol Soc 10:32–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilghman NG (1987) Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Landsc Urban Plan 14:481–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (2002) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2007) State and county quickfacts. Last revised: Friday, 12th January 2007 16:06:43 EST. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/51/51107.html. Accessed 7 January 2010

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2007) World population prospects: the 2007. http://esa.un.org/unup, Accessed 2 October 2010

  • USDA and USDI (2001) Urban wildland interface communities within vicinity of Federal lands that are at high risk from wildfire. Fed Regist 66:751–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidinger K (2002) Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests. J Anim Ecol 71:424–437

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Todd Lookingbill and two unknown reviewers for providing critical comments on previous versions of the manuscript. Our special thanks goes to the High Knob Owners Association (especially Kay Clement and Marcy McCann) for organizing access to the facility and contact to the citizens, who always welcomed us and allowed data collection in their community, talked about the regional and High Knob area history, and provided coffee in the ‘Bagels-Bunch group’ discussions. Jennifer Buff facilitated contacts to Warren County administration for data on exurban development in the county. Gary Somers of The National Park Service, Shenandoah National Park (permit #: SHEN-2006-SCI-0009), and James T Smalls (Forest Ranger of Massanutten Mountain/George Washington and Jefferson National Forests) provided further valuable information and permits to establish the forest point counts for our study. The study was supported with funds from the Smithsonian’s Conservation and Research Center GIS Lab.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Appalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, 301 Braddock Road, Frostburg, MD, 21532, USA

    Marcela Suarez-Rubio

  2. Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, 1500 Remount Road, Front Royal, VA, 22630, USA

    Peter Leimgruber & Swen C. Renner

  3. Institute of Experimental Ecology, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89069, Ulm, Germany

    Swen C. Renner

Authors
  1. Marcela Suarez-Rubio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Leimgruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Swen C. Renner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marcela Suarez-Rubio or Swen C. Renner.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suarez-Rubio, M., Leimgruber, P. & Renner, S.C. Influence of exurban development on bird species richness and diversity. J Ornithol 152, 461–471 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0605-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0605-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation