Skip to main content
Log in

Degree of protandry reflects level of extrapair paternity in migratory songbirds

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males of most migratory organisms, including many birds, precede female conspecifics on their journey to the breeding areas. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of protandrous migration, yet they have rarely been tested at the interspecific level. Here, we provide correlational support for the “mate opportunity” hypothesis, which assumes that selection favours protandry in polygynous species where males gain significant fitness benefits from arriving earlier than females. Drawing on phenological data collected at two northern European stopover sites, we show that the time-lag in spring passage between males and females of five Palearctic migratory songbird species is positively associated with levels of extrapair paternity available from the literature. This suggests that males arrive relatively more in advance of females in species with high sperm competition where sexual selection through female choice is intense. Thus, protandry may arise from selection on the relative arrival timing of males and females rather than from selection within one of the sexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Glynn C (1986) Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323:152–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahola M, Laaksonen T, Sippola K, Eeva T, Raino K, Lehikoinen E (2004) Variation in climate warming along the migration route uncouples arrival and breeding dates. Glob Change Biol 10:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearhop S, Fiedler W, Furness RW, Votier SC, Waldron S, Newton J, Bowen GJ, Berthold P, Farnsworth K (2005) Assortative mating as a mechanism for rapid evolution of a migratory divide. Science 310:502–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berthold P (1996) Control of bird migration. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman KM, Lessells CM, Komdeur J (2005) Male reed buntings do not adjust parental effort in relation to extrapair paternity. Behav Ecol 16:499–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Brün J, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T (1996) Elternschaftsnachweise bei Trauerschnäppern (Ficedula hypoleuca) am Westrand ihres mitteleuropäischen Verbreitungsareals. J Ornithol 137:435–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Catry P, Lecoq M, Araújo A, Conway G, Felgueiras M, King JMB, Rumsey S, Hamidi Salima H, Tenreiro P (2005) Differential migration of chiffchaffs Phylloscopus collybita and P. ibericus in Europe and Africa. J Avian Biol 36:184–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton E (2000) Female mate guarding: no evidence in a socially monogamous species. Anim Behav 59:201–207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon A, Ross D, O’Malley SLC, Burke T (1994) Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extrapair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371:698–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellegren H, Lifjeld J, Slagsvold T, Primmer C (1995) Handicapped males and extrapair paternity in pied flycatchers: a study using microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 4:739–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornasari L, Bottoni L, Sacchi N, Massa R (1994) Home range overlapping and socio-sexual relationships in the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio. Ethol Ecol Evol 6:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis CM, Cooke F (1986) Differential timing of spring migration in wood warblers (Parulinae). Auk 103:548–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelter HP, Tegelström H (1992) High frequency of extrapair paternity in Swedish pied flycatchers revealed by allozyme electrophoresis and DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselquist D (1998) Polygyny in great reed warblers: a long-term study of factors contributing to male fitness. Ecology 79:2376–2390

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüppop K, Hüppop O (2004) An atlas of bird ringing at the island of Helgoland. Part 2: phenology in the trapping garden from 1961 to 2000. Vogelwarte 42:285–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketterson ED, Nolan VJ (1976) Geographic variation and its climatic correlates in the sex ratio of eastern-wintering dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis hyemalis). Ecology 76:1242–1250

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketterson ED, Nolan V (1983) The evolution of differential bird migration. Curr Ornithol1:357–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleven O, Lifjeld JT (2005) No evidence for increased offspring heterozygosity from extrapair mating in the reed bunting (Emberiza schoeniclus). Behav Ecol 16:561–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H (1999) Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. J Anim Ecol 68:940–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Komar O, O’Shea BJ, Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG (2005) Evidence of latitudinal sexual segregation among migratory birds wintering in Mexico. Auk 12:938–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Langefors Å, Hasselquist D, von Schantz T (1998) Extrapair fertilizations in the Sedge Warbler. J Avian Biol 29:134–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisler B, Wink M (2000) Frequencies of multiple paternity in three Acrocephalus species (Aves Sylviidae) with different mating systems (A. palustris, A. arundinaceus, A. paludicola). Ethol Ecol Evol 12:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisler B, Winkler H, Wink M (2002) Evolution of breeding systems in acrocephaline warblers. Auk 119:379–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessels CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T, Lampe HM (1991) Low frequency of extra-pair paternity in pied flycatchers revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano GA, Perreault S, Lemon RE (1996) Age, arrival date and reproductive success of male American redstarts Setophaga ruticilla. J Avian Biol 27:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubjuhn T, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Brün J (2000) Reproductive success of monogamous and polygynous pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:12-17

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1994) Phenotype-dependent arrival time and its consequences in a migratory bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (2004) Protandry, sexual selection and climate change. Glob Change Biol 10:2028–2035

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1994) The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity. Evolution 48:1089–1100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Szép T (2005) Rapid evolutionary change in a secondary sexual character linked to climatic change. J Evol Biol 18:481–495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Brohede J, Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Primmer C (2003) Extrapair paternity in relation to sexual ornamentation, arrival date and condition in a migratory bird. Behav Ecol 14:707–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Berthold P, Fiedler W (2004) The challenge of future research on climate change and avian biology. Adv Ecol Res 35:237–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbey YE, Ydenberg RC (2001) Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review. Ecol Lett 4:663–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JP (1981) A test of three hypotheses for latitudinal segregation of the sexes in wintering birds. Can J Zool 59:1527–1534

    Google Scholar 

  • Neudorf DLH (2004) Extrapair paternity in birds: understanding variation among species. Auk 121:302–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninni P, de Lope F, Saino N, Haussy C, Møller AP (2004) Antioxidants and condition-dependence of arrival date in a migratory bird. Oikos 105:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens IPF, Hartley IR (1998) Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are the so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:397–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Quader S (2005) Mate choice theory and its application in conservation and management. Curr Sci 89:1220–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabøl J, Rahbek C (2002) Population trends in the Baltic passerine migrants elucidated by a combination of ringing data and point- and summer-count indices. Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift 96:15–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Rätti O, Hovi M, Lundberg A, Tegelström H, Alatalo RV (1995) Extra-pair paternity and male characteristics in the pied flycatcher. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:419–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubolini D, Spina F, Saino N (2004) Protandry and sexual dimorphism in trans-Saharan migratory birds. Behav Ecol 15:592–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Saino N, Szép T, Ambrosini R, Romano M, Møller AP (2004) Ecological conditions during winter affect sexual selection and breeding in a migratory bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:681–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon B, Burke T (1994) Copulation behavior and paternity in the chaffinch. Behav Ecol Soc Biol 34:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ, Moore FR (2005) Arrival timing and seasonal reproductive performance in a long-distance migratory landbird. Behav Ecol Soc Biol 57:231–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Spina F, Massi A, Montemaggiori A (1994) Back from Africa: who’s running ahead? Differential migration of sex and age classes in Palearctic-African spring migrants. Ostrich 65:137–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Spottiswoode C, Møller AP (2004) Extrapair paternity, migration, and breeding synchrony in birds. Behav Ecol 15:41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrill SB, Berthold P (1990) Ecophysiological aspects of rapid population growth in a novel migratory blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla) population: an experimental approach. Oecologia 85:266–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tøttrup AP, Thorup K, Rahbek C (2006) Patterns of change in timing of spring migration in North European songbird populations. J Avian Biol 37:84–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Fagerström T (1977) Why do males emerge before females? A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterflies. Oecologia 31:153–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zink G (1973–1985) Der Zug europäisher Singvögel. Vogelzug Verlag Möggingen

  • Zink G, Bairlein F (1995) Der Zug europäischer Singvögel. Ein Atlas der Wiederfunde beringter Vögel. 5. Lieferung Band III. AULA-Verlag Wiesbaden

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank K. Hüppop, O. Hüppop, J.M. Lausten, P. Lyngs, and J. Rabøl for ensuring the high quality of data collected at Vogelwarte Helgoland and Christiansø Research Station, as well as the numerous voluntary coworkers at these observatories. We thank F. Bairlein, A.P. Møller, F. Pulido, and C. Rahbek for critical appraisal of the manuscript. The Danish National and Nature Agency and The National Environmental Research Institute financed the collection of the Christiansø data. A.P.T. is supported by Danish National Science Foundation grant J. nr. 21-03-0221.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Coppack.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coppack, T., Tøttrup, A.P. & Spottiswoode, C. Degree of protandry reflects level of extrapair paternity in migratory songbirds. J Ornithol 147, 260–265 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-006-0067-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-006-0067-3

Keywords

Navigation