Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combining prospective motion correction and distortion correction for EPI: towards a comprehensive correction of motion and susceptibility-induced artifacts

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object

State-of-the-art MR techniques that rely on echo planar imaging (EPI), such as real-time fMRI, are limited in their applicability by both subject motion and B0 field inhomogeneities. The goal of this work is to demonstrate that in principle it is possible to accurately predict the B0 field inhomogeneities that occur during echo planar imaging in the presence of large scale head motion and apply this knowledge for distortion correction.

Materials and methods

In this work, prospective motion correction is combined with a field-prediction method and a method for correcting geometric distortions in EPI. To validate the methods, echo planar images were acquired of a custom-made phantom rotated to different angles relative to the B0 field. For each orientation, field maps were acquired for comparison with the field predictions.

Results

The calculated field maps are very similar to the measured field maps for all orientations used in the experiments. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the difference maps was between 15 to 20 Hz. The quality of distortion correction using calculated field maps is comparable to distortion correction done with measured field maps.

Conclusion

The results suggest that distortion-free echo planar imaging of moving objects may be feasible if prospective motion correction is combined with a field inhomogeneity estimation approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EPI:

Echo planar imaging

GRE:

Gradient echo (gradient recalled echo)

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

ppm:

Parts per million

PVC:

Polyvinyl chloride

References

  1. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Nayak AS, Glynn P (1990) Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 14: 68–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline JB, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ (1995) Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp 3: 165–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friston KJ, Williams S, Howard R, Frackowiak RSJ, Turner R (1996) Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med 35: 346–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caparelli EC, Tomasi D, Ernst T (2005) The effect of small rotations on R2* measured with echo planar imaging. Neuroimage 24: 1164–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jezzard P, Balaban RS (1995) Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magn Reson Med 34: 65–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jezzard P, Clare S (1999) Sources of distortion in functional MRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 8: 80–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu DH, Lewin JS, Duerk JL (1997) Inadequacy of motion correction algorithms in functional MRI: role of susceptibility-induced artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 7: 365–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thesen S, Heid O, Mueller E, Schad LR (2000) Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image-based tracking for real-time fMRI. Magn Reson Med 44: 457–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zaitsev M, Dold C, Sakas G, Hennig J, Speck O (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system. Neuroimage 31: 1038–1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Speck O, Hennig J, Zaitsev M (2006) Prospective real-time slice-by-slice motion correction for fMRI in freely moving subjects. Magn Reson Mater Phy 19: 55–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersson JLR, Hutton C, Ashburner J, Turner R, Friston K (2001) Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series. Neuroimage 13: 903–919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hillenbrand DF, Lo KM, Punchard WFB, Reese TG, Starewicz PM (2005) High-order MR shimming: a simulation study of the effectiveness of competing methods, using an established susceptibility model of the human head. Appl Magn Reson 29: 39–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaitsev M, Hennig J, Speck O (2004) Point spread function mapping with parallel imaging techniques and high acceleration factors: fast, robust, and flexible method for echo-planar imaging distortion correction. Magn Reson Med 52: 1156–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hutton C, Bork A, Josephs O, Deichmann R, Ashburner J, Turner R (2002) Image distortion correction in fMRI: a quantitative evaluation. Neuroimage 16: 217–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koch KM, Papademetris X, Rothman DL, de Graaf RA (2006) Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance. Phys Med Biol 51: 6381–6402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marques JP, Bowtell R (2005) Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson B Magn Reson Eng 25(B): 65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salomir R, de Senneville BD, Moonen CTW (2003) A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson B Magn Reson Eng 19: 26–34

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson JD, Fox RF (1999) Classical electrodynamics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haacke ME, Brown RW (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. Wiley

  20. Lorentz HA (1915, reprint 2003) The theory of electrons and its application to the phenomena of light and heat. Courier Dover Publications, New York

  21. Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands M (1975) The Feynman lectures on physics, Mainly electromagnetism and matter, vol 2. Addison-Wesley

  22. Durrant CJ, Hertzberg MP, Kuchel PW (2003) Magnetic susceptibility: further insights into macroscopic and microscopic fields and the sphere of Lorentz. Concepts Magn Reson 18A: 72–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng YCN, Neelavalli J, Haacke EM (2009) Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method. Phys Med Biol 54: 1169–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu T, Spincemaille P, de Rochefort L, Kressler B, Wang Y (2009) Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med 61: 196–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schenck JF (1996) The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23: 815–850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jenkinson M, Wilson JL, Jezzard P (2004) Perturbation method for magnetic field calculations of nonconductive objects. Magn Reson Med 52: 471–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoder DA, Zhao Y, Paschal CB, Fitzpatrick JM (2004) MRI simulator with object-specific field map calculations. Magn Reson Imaging 22: 315–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Collins CM, Yang B, Yang QX, Smith MB (2002) Numerical calculations of the static magnetic field in three-dimensional multi-tissue models of the human head. Magn Reson Imaging 20: 413–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Truong TK, Clymer BD, Chakeres DW, Schmalbrock P (2002) Three-dimensional numerical simulations of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities in the human head1. Magn Reson Imaging 20: 759–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2005) Unified segmentation. NeuroImage 26: 839–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Boegle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boegle, R., Maclaren, J. & Zaitsev, M. Combining prospective motion correction and distortion correction for EPI: towards a comprehensive correction of motion and susceptibility-induced artifacts. Magn Reson Mater Phy 23, 263–273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-010-0225-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-010-0225-8

Keywords

Navigation