Abstract
Primate home range sizes can vary tremendously as a consequence of the analytical technique chosen to estimate home range. This is exemplified by a recent dataset on free ranging snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) in Northwest Yunnan, China. Our findings show that the grid cell method cannot substitute for the minimum convex polygon (MCP) method and vice versa. MCP-based estimates are far too large, especially when the form of the home range is irregular due to forays into peripheral areas. Here, we propose an adjusted polygon method, whereby unsuitable and never visited areas are clipped out from the polygon, thus producing more accurate results. Compared to the grid cell method, the adjusted MCP is much more robust when the number of group relocations is limited; MCP turned out to be the method of choice for calculation of monthly and seasonal home ranges. The grid cell method on the other hand yielded the most precise estimates for total or annual home ranges. The style of ranging exhibited by a given primate taxon or population determines which analytical procedures should be applied to estimate home range size, and we would stress the need for thorough evaluation of the pros and cons of home range estimators before conducting field work and analysing data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams L, Davis SD (1967) The internal anatomy of home range. J Mammal 48:529–536
Burgman MA, Fox JC (2003) Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Anim Conserv 6:19–28
Fashing PJ, Mulindahabi F, Gakima J-B, Masozera M, Mununura I, Plumptre A, Nguyen N (2007) Activity and ranging patterns of Angolan black-and-white colobus (Colobus angolensis ruwenzorii) in Nyungwe Forest, Rwanda: possible costs of large group size. Int J Primatol 28:529–550
Harris S, Cresswell WJ, Forde PG, Trewhella WJ, Woollard T, Wray S (1990) Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data—a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Rev 20:97–123
Hayne D (1949) Calculation of size of home range. J Mammal 30:1–18
Izumiyama S, Mochizuki T, Shiraishi T (2003) Troop size, home range area and seasonal range use of the Japanese macaque in the Northern Japan Alps. Ecol Res 18:465–474
Kernohan BJ, Gitzen RA, Millspaugh JJ (2001) Analysis of animal space use and movements. In: Millspaugh JJ, Marzluff JM (eds) Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic, San Diego, pp 125–166
Kool K, Croft D (1992) Estimators for home range areas of arboreal colobine monkeys. Folia Primatol 58:210–214
Lehmann J, Boesch C (2003) Social influences on ranging patterns among chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in the Tai National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Behav Ecol 14:642–649
Li Z, Rogers M (2005) Habitat quality and range use of white-headed langurs in Fusui, China. Folia Primatol 76:185–195
Macdonald D, Ball F, Hough N (1980) The evaluation of home range size and configuration using radio tracking data. In: Amlaner C, Macdonald D (eds) A handbook on biotelemetry and radio tracking. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 402–424
Mills MGL, Gorman ML (1987) The scent-marking behaviour of the spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta in the southern Kalahari. J Zool 212:483–497
Olson DK (1986) Determining range size for arboreal monkeys: methods, assumptions, and accuracy. In: Taub DM, Kay FA (eds) Current perspective in primate social dynamics. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 212–227
Ostro LET, Young TP, Silver SC, Koontz FW (1999) A geographic information system (GIS) method for estimating home range size. J Wildl Manage 63:748–755
Powell R (2000) Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In: Boitani L, Fuller T (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology. Controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 65–110
Robbins M, McNeilage A (2003) Home range and frugivory patterns of mountain gorillas in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. Int J Primatol 24:467–491
Sterling E, Nguyen N, Fashing P (2000) Spatial patterning in nocturnal prosimians: a review of methods and relevance to studies of sociality. Am J Primatol 51:3–19
White G, Garrott R (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio tracking data. Academic, San Diego
Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168
Worton BJ (1995) A convex hull-based estimator of home range size. Biometrics 51:1206–1215
Acknowledgments
Jiaoyan Zhuang is acknowledged for helping with GIS analyses, and Lao Feng, Xuesheng Feng and Xuewen Feng for helping with GPS data collection. The following granting agencies supported the research: Janggen-Pöhn-Stiftung, A. H. Schultz Stiftung, Zürcher Tierschutz, Zoological Society of San Diego, Offield Family Foundation, Primate Conservation, Inc., G. & A. Claraz-Schenkung, Goethe-Stiftung, Schweizerische Akademie der Naturwissenschaften SANW, and Primate Action Fund of Conservation International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Grueter, C.C., Li, D., Ren, B. et al. Choice of analytical method can have dramatic effects on primate home range estimates. Primates 50, 81–84 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-008-0113-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-008-0113-2