Skip to main content
Log in

Post-contest behaviour in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus): loser displays, not victory displays, follow asymmetrical countersinging exchanges

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Victory displays are behaviours that occur after the conclusion of a signaling contest, performed solely by the contest winner. Victory displays may reinforce the dominance of the winner either to the loser or to other conspecifics within signaling range. Victory displays are poorly studied despite the significant consequences that post-conflict behaviour may have on the individuals involved. We examined the period immediately following 50 territorial countersinging contests between males in 10 neighbourhoods of black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) of known dominance rank. We characterized the post-contest singing behaviour of chickadees and evaluated whether post-contest behaviour is consistent with victory displays. Using a 16-microphone acoustic location system to simultaneously record entire neighbourhoods of breeding chickadees, we isolated 50 dyadic countersinging contests and measured the vocal behaviour of the contestants in the minutes following each interaction. Eighty-six percent of contests were followed by a period of solo singing by one of the contestants, while 14% were followed by silence. The post-contest singer was most often the contestant who held a subordinate dominance position in the previous winter’s dominance hierarchy; dominant males performed post-contest song bouts significantly less often. Asymmetry in overlapping between contestants did not predict which bird sang a post-contest bout. However, in a significant majority of cases, the post-contest singer was pitch-matched by his opponent during the contest more than he pitch-matched his opponent. Our results indicate that male chickadees do not perform acoustic victory displays after countersinging contests. In contrast, the post-contest behaviour of territorial chickadees is more consistent with a “loser display”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aureli F (1992) Post-conflict behaviour among wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower JL (2000) Acoustic interactions during naturally occurring territorial conflict in a song sparrow neighborhood. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA

  • Bower JL (2005) The occurrence and function of victory displays within communication networks. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie PJ, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2004) Pitch shifts and song structure indicate male quality in the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons LP, Foote JR, Ratcliffe LM, Mennill DJ (2008) Frequency matching, overlapping and movement behaviour in diurnal countersinging interactions of black-capped chickadees. Anim Behav (in press), DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.11.006

  • Grafe TU, Bitz J (2004) An acoustic postconflict display in the duetting tropical boubou (Laniarius aethiopicus): a signal of victory? BMC Eco 4:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazam AJ, Aureli F (2005) Redirection of aggression: multiparty signaling within a network? In: McGregor PK (ed) Communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 191–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos RJ, Schlupp I (2005) Performing in front of an audience: signalers and the social environment. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK (2005) Introduction. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Otter KA (2007) Status signaling and communication networks in chickadees: Complex communication with a simple song. In: Otter KA (ed) Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2004a) Do male black-capped chickadees eavesdrop on song contests? A multi-speaker playback experiment. Behaviour 141:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2004b) Overlapping and matching in the song contests of black-capped chickadees. Anim Behav 67:441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM, Boag PT (2002) Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science 296:873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Boag PT, Ratcliffe LM (2003) The reproductive choices of eavesdropping female black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus. Naturwissenschaften 90:577–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Burt JM, Fristrup KM, Vehrencamp SL (2006) Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting tropical songbirds. J Acoustic Soc America 119:2832–2839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otter KA, Ratcliffe L, Njegovan M, Fotheringham J (2002) Importance of frequency and temporal song matching in black-capped chickadees: evidence from interactive playback. Ethology 108:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peake TM (2005) Eavesdropping in communication networks. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe LM, Mennill DJ, Schubert KA (2007) Social dominance and fitness in black-capped chickadees. In: Otter KA (ed) Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Todt D, Naguib M (2000) Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Adv Study Behav 29:247–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank J. Baldock, R. Bull, S. Doucet, R. Jamieson, A. McKellar, D. Potvin, and K. Winger for field assistance. We thank the Curtis, Lundell, Warren, Weatherhead-Metz, and Zink families, for access to property, and the staff of Queen’s University Biological Station for logistical support. We thank J. Burt for software design. We thank J. Bower for comments that improved the manuscript. We thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Ontario Government, the Society of Canadian Ornithologists, the American Ornithologists’ Union, the American Museum of Natural History, the University of Windsor, and Queen’s University for funding. This experiment complies with the current laws of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Mennill.

Additional information

Communicated by P. McGregor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lippold, S., Fitzsimmons, L.P., Foote, J.R. et al. Post-contest behaviour in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus): loser displays, not victory displays, follow asymmetrical countersinging exchanges. acta ethol 11, 67–72 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-008-0043-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-008-0043-4

Keywords

Navigation