Abstract
Divorce and remating in birds can be described as strategies used to enhance reproductive success. Mate switching often occurs because pairs failed to brood at least one chick during the previous breeding season. In the present study, we evaluated the influence of reproductive success on female preferences in domesticated canaries (Serinus canaria). For that purpose, females previously paired and having reared young were placed in a choice test situation: They were allowed to choose between their previous mate and a familiar male (a male neighbor during the breeding period). During these choice tests, females tended to stay near their previous mate longer than near a male neighbor when their reproductive success was “good” (at least two chicks). On the other hand, females with “poor” reproductive success (one chick) did not show a preference for their previous mate. Furthermore, in the present study, we observed that during choice tests males reacted to the presence of their previous mate in a particular way, by gathering nest material. This behavior was more scarcely observed in neighbor males which, on the contrary, sang significantly more than previous mates did.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akins CK, Levens N, Bakondy H (2002) The role of static features of males in the mate choice behavior of female Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Behav Processes 58:97–103
Beani L, Dessi-Fulgheri F (1995) Mate choice in the grey partridge, Perdrix perdrix: role of physical and behavioural male traits. Anim Behav 49:347–356
Béguin N, Leboucher G, Kreutzer M (1998) Sexual preferences for mate song in female canaries (Serinus canaria). Behaviour 135:1185–1186
Bossema I, Kruijt J (1982) Male activity and female mate acceptance in the Mallard. Behaviour 79:313–324
Buchholz R (1995) Female choice, parasite load and male ornamentation in wild turkeys. Anim Behav 50:929–943
Choudhury S (1995) Divorce in birds: a review of the hypotheses. Anim Behav 50:412–429
Collins SA (1994) Male displays: cause or effect of female preference? Anim Behav 48:371–375
Collins SA (1995) The effect of recent experience on female choice in zebra finches. Anim Behav 49:479–486
Coulson JC (1966) The influence of the pair-bond and age on the breeding biology of the kittiwake gull (Rissa tridactyla). J Anim Ecol 35:269–279
Coulson JC (1972) The significance of pair bond in the kittiwake Rissa tridactyla. Proc Int Ornithol Congr 15:423–433
Dhondt AA (2002) Changing mates. Trends Ecol Evol 17(2):55–56
Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1990) On the function of singing and wing-waving in the European starling Sturnus vulgaris. Bird Study 37:48–52
Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1993) Function of the song and song repertoire in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): an aviary experiment. Behaviour 125:51–66
Ens BJ, Safriel UN, Harris MP (1993) Divorce in the long-lived and monogamous oystercatcher, Haematopus ostralegus: incompatibility or choosing the better option? Anim Behav 45:1199–1217
Ens BJ, Choudhury S, Black JM (1996) Mate fidelity and divorce in monogamous birds. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds, the study of monogamy, vol. 19. Oxford University Press, London, UK, pp 344–395
Enstrom DE, Ketterson ED, Nolan V Jr (1997) Testosterone and mate choice in the dark-eyed junco. Anim Behav 54:1135–1146
Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212
Hinde RA (1954) The courtship and copulation of the greenfinch (Chloris chloris). Behaviour 7:207–232
Houtman AM, Falls JB (1994) Negative assortative mating in the white-throated sparrow, Zonotrichia albicollis: the role of mate choice and intra-sexual competition. Anim Behav 48:377–383
Immelmann K, Pröve R, Lassek R, Bischof HJ (1991) Influence of adult courtship experience on the development of sexual preferences in zebra finch males. Anim Behav 42:83–89
Johnsen TS, Zuk M (1996) Repeatability of mate choice in female red jungle fowl. Behav Ecol 7(3):243–246
Johnston VH, Ryder JP (1987) Divorce in larids: a review. Colon Waterbirds 10:16–26
Jones KM, Monaghan P, Nager RG (2001) Male mate choice and female fecundity in zebra finches. Anim Behav 62:1021–1026
Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, London
Leitner S, Catchpole CK (2002) Female canaries that respond and discriminate more between male songs of different quality have a larger song control nucleus (HVC) in the brain. J Neurobiol 52:294–301
Lindén M (1991) Divorce in great tits—chance or choice? An experimental approach. Am Nat 138:1039–1048
Logan CA, Wingfield JC (1995) Hormonal correlates of breeding status, nest construction, and parental care in multiple-brooded northern mockingbirds, Mimus polyglottos. Horm Behav 29:12–30
McNamara JM, Forslund P (1996) Divorce rates in birds: predictions from an optimisation model. Am Nat 147(4):609–640
Mateos C, Carranza J (1995) Female choice for morphological features of male ring-necked pheasants. Anim Behav 49:737–748
Mota PG, Hoi-Leitner M (2003) Intense extrapair behaviour in a semi-colonial passerine does not result in extrapair fertilizations. Anim Behav 66:1019–1026
Nagle L, Kreutzer ML, Vallet EM (1993) Obtaining copulation solicitation displays in female canaries without estradiol implants. Experientia 49:1022–1023
O’Loghlen AL, Beecher MD (1999) Mate, neighbour and stranger songs: a female song sparrow perspective. Anim Behav 58:13–20
Orell M, Rytkönen S, Koivula K (1994) Causes of divorce in the monogamous willow tit, Parus montanus, and consequences for reproductive success. Anim Behav 8:1143–1154
Palokangas P, Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H, Huhta E, Tolonen P, Alatalo R (1994) Female kestrels gain reproductive success by choosing brightly ornamented males. Anim Behav 47:443–448
Ramsay SM, Otter KA, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM, Boag PT (2000) Divorce and extrapair mating in female black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus): separate strategies with a common target. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:18–23
Rowley I (1983) Re-mating in birds. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice (Chap. 15). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 331–360
Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New-York
Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC (1994) Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finch. Nature 367(13):165–166 (Jan)
Ten Cate C, Hilbers J (1991) Effects of brood size on inter-clutch intervals, offspring development and male–female interactions in the ring dove Streptopelia risoria. Anim Behav 41:27–36
Thomas CS, Coulson JC (1988) Reproductive success of kittiwake gulls, Rissa tridactyla. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 251–262
Vallet E, Beme I, Kreutzer M (1998) Two-note syllables in canary songs elicit high levels of sexual display. Anim Behav 55:291–297
Voigt C, Leitner S, Gahr M (2003) Mate fidelity in a population of Island canaries (Serinus canaria) in the Madeiran archipelago. J Ornithol 144:86–92
Wagner RH (1991) Evidence that female razorbills control extra-pair copulations. Behaviour 118:157–169
White DJ, Galef BG Jr (1999) Affiliative preferences are stable and predict mate choices in both sexes of Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica. Anim Behav 58:865–871
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript and Marie Monbureau for her helpful English corrections. The authors are grateful to V. Boulouard, K. Dubois, and C. Desaleux for their technical assistance. This study was realized with funds from the CNRS (UPRESA 70 25) at Université Paris X Nanterre. The experiments described in this manuscript comply with the current laws of the country (France) in which they were performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. McGregor
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beguin, N., Leboucher, G., Bruckert, L. et al. Mate preferences in female canaries (Serinus canaria) within a breeding season. acta ethol 9, 65–70 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-006-0017-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-006-0017-3