Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mauvaise préparation: quels échelles et risques pour le patient ?

Bad preparation: what are the scales and risks for patients?

  • Vidéo-Digest / Video-Digest
  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, Ho MN, Gottlieb L, Sternberg SS, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;328:901–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, Barcherini S, Crespi M, Italian Multicentre Study Group. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001;48:812–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA 2006;295:2366–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung K, Pinsky P, Laiyemo AO, Lanza E, Schatzkin A, Schoen RE. Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the polyp prevention trial continued follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:111–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Rex DK. Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:451–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ee HC, Semmens JB, Hoffman NE, Perth Teaching Hospitals Endoscopy Group. Complete colonoscopy rarely misses cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:167–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, Li C, He J, Rabeneck L. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004;127:452–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, Lederle FA, Bond JH. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:1259–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:96–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Stürmer T, Hoffmeister M. Potential for colorectal cancer prevention of sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy: population-based case control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:494–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lakoff J, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Rabeneck L. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1117–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aronchick CA, Lipchitz WH, Wright SH, Dufrayne F, Bergman G. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:346–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aronchick CA. Bowel preparation scale. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:1037–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma VK, Chockalingham SK, Ugheoke EA, Kapur A, Ling PH, Vasudeva R, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:167–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parra-Blanco A, Quintero E, Jiménez A. Good colon preparation guarantees a higher diagnostic yield of colonoscopy-timing is most crucial. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:908–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:482–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:620–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ, Cryer B, Davila R, Cipher D, et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:700–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rapier R, Houston C. A prospective study to assess the efficacy and patient tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs 2006;29:305–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Soweid AM, Kobeissy AA, Jamali FR, El-Tarchichi M, Skoury A, Abdul-Baki H, et al. A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Endoscopy 2010;42:633–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown MC, Hecker LM. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of Ensure® during preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:2529

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kruss DM, DeBartolo M, Livak AP, Serlovsky R. Explosion-safe, enema-free, nutritious colonoscopy preparation using a prepackaged formula diet. Gastrointest Endosc 1985;31:18–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797–802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists’ recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2680–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH, Church TR, Allen JI. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:1335–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen LB, Sanyal SM, von Althann C, Bodian C, Whitson M, Bamji N, et al. Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations. Aliment Pharmacol Tract 2010:32;637–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1696–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service des maladies de l’appareil digestif, CHU de Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri-Le-Guilloux, F-35033, Rennes cedex 09, France

    D. Heresbach

Authors
  1. D. Heresbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Heresbach.

About this article

Cite this article

Heresbach, D. Mauvaise préparation: quels échelles et risques pour le patient ?. Acta Endosc 40, 337–342 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-010-0112-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-010-0112-1

Search

Navigation