Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of patient dose and image quality with z-axis dose modulation for computed tomography (CT) head in acute head trauma and stroke

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze the effect of z-axis modulation for CT head protocols on patient dose and image quality in patients with acute head trauma and stroke. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. We retrospectively evaluated the effect of dose modulation on unenhanced CT head examinations in patients with acute head trauma and stroke. Two series of 100 consecutive studies were reviewed: 100 studies performed without dose modulation, 100 studies performed with z-axis dose modulation. Multidetector 16-section CT was performed sequentially and axial 5-mm-thick slices were obtained from base of skull to vertex. With z-axis dose modulation, the same tube current range was maintained, but a computer algorithm altered the tube current applied to each CT section. For each examination, the weighted volume CT dose index (CTDI (vol)) and dose-length product (DLP) were recorded and noise was measured. Each study was also reviewed for image quality by two independent, blinded readers. The variables (CTDI (vol) and DLP, image quality, and noise) in the two groups were compared by using student t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For unenhanced CT head examinations, the CTDI (vol) and DLP, respectively, were reduced by 35.8% and 35.2%, respectively, by using z-axis dose modulation. Image quality and noise were unaffected by the use of this dose modulation technique (P < 0.004). Utilization of z-axis modulation technique for CT head examination in patients with acute head trauma and stroke offers significant radiation dose reduction while image quality is optimally maintained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith-Bondman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169(22):2078–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169(22):2071–2077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohnen M, Wittsack HJ, Assadi S et al (2006) Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(8):1741–1745

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ et al (2008) Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics 28(5):1451–1459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M et al (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abbate A, Vetrovec G, Crea F et al (2010) Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. NEJM 363:92–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leng S, Yu L, McCollough CH (2010) Radiation dose reduction at CT enterography: how low can we go while preserving diagnostic accuracy? Am J Roentgenol 195:76–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schnellinger MG, Reid S, Louie J (2010) Are serial brain imaging scans required for children who have suffered acute intracranial injury secondary to blunt head trauma? Clin Pediatr 49:569–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Golding SJ (2010) Radiation exposure in CT: what is the professionally responsible approach? Radiology 255:683–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patatas K (2010) Does the protocol for suspected renal colic lead to unnecessary radiation exposure of young female patients? Emerg Med J 27:389–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pierce DA, Preston DL (2000) Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 154(2):178–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Preston DL, Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Ron E, Mabuchi K (2003) Dose response and temporal patterns of radiation-associated solid cancer risks. Health Phys 85(1):43–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT et al (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(24):13761–13766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1991 21(1–3):1–201

  16. Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC (1981) A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 8:488–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith AB, Dillon WP, Lau BC et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction strategy for CT protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section. Radiology 247(2):499–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee EJ, Lee SK, Agid R et al (2009) Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between fixed tube current and combined automatic tube current modulation in craniocervical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(9):1754–1759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Christner JA, Zavaletta VA, Eusemann CD et al (2010) Dose reduction in helical CT: dynamically adjustable z-axis X-ray beam collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(1):W49–W55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Niu Y, Wang Z, Liu Y et al (2010) Radiation dose to the lens using different temporal bone CT scanning protocols. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(2):226–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mnyusiwalla A, Aviv RI, Symons SP et al (2009) Radiation dose from multidetector row CT imaging for acute stroke. Neuroradiology 51(10):635–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tan JS, Tan KL, Lee JC et al (2009) Comparison of eye lens dose on neuroimaging protocols between 16- and 64-section multidetector CT: achieving the lowest possible dose. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(2):373–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Udayasankar UK, Braithwaite K, Arvaniti M et al (2008) Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(4):802–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Thomas Zacharia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zacharia, T.T., Kanekar, S.G., Nguyen, D.T. et al. Optimization of patient dose and image quality with z-axis dose modulation for computed tomography (CT) head in acute head trauma and stroke. Emerg Radiol 18, 103–107 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0908-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0908-5

Keywords

Navigation