Skip to main content
Log in

Deutsches Reanimationsregister der DGAI

The German Resuscitation Registry of the DGAI

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Der „plötzliche Herztod“ ist mit einer Inzidenz von mehr als 100 pro 100.000 Einwohner und Jahr eine sehr häufige Todesursache in Deutschland. Das Überleben nach „plötzlichem Herztod“ und Reanimation – auch nach anderen Ursachen – ist nicht ausschließlich als schicksalhaft zu begreifen, denn Notarzt- und Rettungsdienste in Deutschland und Europa unterscheiden sich hinsichtlich ihrer Versorgungsqualität eklatant.

Methoden

Analyse und Auswertung des Deutschen Reanimationsregisters der Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI) sowie klinischer Studien.

Ergebnisse

Beste Ergebnisse lassen sich nur erzielen, wenn die gesamte Rettungskette optimiert wurde. Dies beginnt mit Laien- und Telefon-CPR (kardiopulmonale Reanimation), erfordert die Einhaltung einer medizinisch definierten Hilfsfrist, die optimierte Durchführung der Basismaßnahmen sowie die optimale notärztliche Betreuung noch vor Erreichen des Krankenhauses. Lässt sich der Patient präklinisch stabilisieren, ist er in ein „Cardiac-Arrest-Zentrum“ einzuliefern, sodass sowohl die therapeutische Hypothermie als auch eine perkutane koronare Intervention zeitnah durchgeführt werden können. Das Deutsche Reanimationsregister konnte von der DGAI zu einem wichtigen Werkzeug des Qualitätsmanagements für die Behandlungskette nach „plötzlichem Herztod“ und Reanimation – auch nach anderen Ursachen – entwickelt werden. Es richtet sich an die verantwortlichen Ärztlichen Leiter der Notarzt- und Rettungsdienste. Die Analyse der Reanimationsbehandlungen erlaubt Rückschlüsse auf die Struktur-, Prozess und Ergebnisqualität des Teilnehmers im Vergleich zu Vorhersageparametern und den Resultaten anderer Teilnehmer.

Schlussfolgerungen

Somit lassen sich eine Stärken- und Schwächenanalyse für den Notarzt- und Rettungsdienst erstellen und gezielt Maßnahmen einleiten, die zum Wohle der Patienten die Versorgungsqualität steigern.

Abstract

Background

Sudden cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in Germany with an incidence of more than 100 deaths per year and 100,000 of population. The survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and resuscitation is not always inevitable, because emergency medical services (EMS) systems in Germany and Europe differ strikingly in terms of their quality of care.

Methods

Analysis of the German Resuscitation Registry of the DGAI and of clinical trials.

Results

The best results can be achieved only if the entire chain of survival has been optimized. This begins with layperson- and telephone-CPR, adherence to a medically defined response time, the optimized implementation of basic life support measures and optimal emergency medical care by physicians before reaching the hospital. If it is possible to stabilize the patient prior to reaching the hospital, he or she should be transported to a “Cardiac Arrest Centre”, so that both the therapeutic hypothermia and percutaneous coronary intervention can be carried out promptly. The German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) of the DGAI (German Association for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine) was developed as an important tool for total quality management in the treatment of OHCA. It is addressed to the responsible medical director of the EMS systems. Analysis of the GRR allows conclusions to be made concerning the structure, process and outcome of the participating EMS system compared to forecast parameters and the results of other participants.

Conclusions

This enables a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis for the EMS system to be performed and should result in the initiation of targeted measures that both increase survival rates after OHCA and the quality of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. Grasner JT, Meybohm P, Fischer M et al (2009) A national resuscitation registry of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany-a pilot study. Resuscitation 80(2):199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG, Koster RW (2010) Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 81(11):1479–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer M, Fischer NJ, Schuttler J (1997) One-year survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Bonn city: outcome report according to the ‚Utstein style’. Resuscitation 33(3):233–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fischer M, Kamp J, Garcia-Castrillo Riesgo L et al (2011) Comparing emergency medical service systems-A project of the European Emergency Data (EED) Project. Resuscitation 82(3):285–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer M, Krep H, Wierich D et al (2003) Effektivitäts- und Effizienzvergleich der Rettungsdienstsysteme in Birmingham (UK) und Bonn (D). Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 38(10):630–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herlitz J, Bahr J, Fischer M et al (1999) Resuscitation in Europe: a tale of five European regions. Resuscitation 41(2):121–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Neukamm J, Graesner JT, Schewe JC et al (2011) The impact of response time reliability on CPR incidence and resuscitation success – a benchmark study from the German Resuscitation Registry. Crit Care 15(6):R282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD (2005) Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation 67(1):75–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Messelken M, Kehrberger E, Dirks B, Fischer M (2010) The quality of emergency medical care in baden-wurttemberg (Germany): four years in focus. Dtsch Arztebl Int 107(30):523–530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arntz HR, Willich SN, Schreiber C et al (2000) Diurnal, weekly and seasonal variation of sudden death. Population-based analysis of 24,061 consecutive cases. Eur Heart J 21(4):315–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Field B et al (2004) Advanced cardiac life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 351(7):647–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Franek O, Pokorna M, Sukupova P (2010) Pre-hospital cardiac arrest in Prague, Czech Republic – the Utstein-style report. Resuscitation 81(7):831–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nurnberger A, Sterz F, Malzer R et al (2013) Out of hospital cardiac arrest in Vienna: incidence and outcome. Resuscitation 84(1):42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grasner JT, Meybohm P, Lefering R et al (2011) ROSC after cardiac arrest – the RACA score to predict outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J 32(13):1649–1656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gräsner J-T, Wnent J, Gräsner I et al (2012) Einfluss der Basisreanimationsmaßnahmen durch Laien auf das Überleben nach plötzlichem Herztod. Notfall Rettungsmed 1–7

  16. Ghuysen A, Collas D, Stipulante S et al (2011) Dispatcher-assisted telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a French-language compression-only protocol in volunteers with or without prior life support training: a randomized trial. Resuscitation 82(1):57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dami F, Fuchs V, Praz L, Vader JP (2010) Introducing systematic dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (telephone-CPR) in a non-Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS): implementation process and costs. Resuscitation 81(7):848–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Neukamm J, Grasner JT, Schewe JC et al (2011) The impact of response time reliability on CPR incidence and resuscitation success: a benchmark study from the German Resuscitation Registry. Crit Care 15(6):R282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sladjana A, Gordana P, Ana S (2011) Emergency response time after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur J Intern Med 22(4):386–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hollenberg J, Bang A, Lindqvist J et al (2005) Difference in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between the two largest cities in Sweden: a matter of time? J Intern Med 257(3):247–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Handley AJ, Handley SA (2003) Improving CPR performance using an audible feedback system suitable for incorporation into an automated external defibrillator. Resuscitation 57(1):57–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lukas RP, Grasner JT, Seewald S et al (2012) Chest compression quality management and return of spontaneous circulation: a matched-pair registry study. Resuscitation 83:1212–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Olasveengen TM, Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J et al (2007) Is CPR quality improving? A retrospective study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 75(2):260–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aufderheide TP, Frascone RJ, Wayne MA et al (2011) Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised trial. Lancet 377(9762):301–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eisenberg M, Horwood B, Cummins R et al (1990) Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities. Ann Emerg Med 19:238–243

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fischer H, Strunk G, Neuhold S et al (2012) The effectiveness of ERC advanced life support (ALS) provider courses for the retention of ALS knowledge. Resuscitation 83(2):227–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woodall J, McCarthy M, Johnston T et al (2007) Impact of advanced cardiac life support-skilled paramedics on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a statewide emergency medical service. Emerg Med J 24(2):134–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Olasveengen TM, Sunde K, Brunborg C et al (2009) Intravenous drug administration during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. JAMA 302(20):2222–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bakalos G, Mamali M, Komninos C et al (2011) Advanced life support versus basic life support in the pre-hospital setting: a meta-analysis. Resuscitation 82(9):1130–1137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Breil M, Krep H, Heister U et al (2012) Randomised study of hypertonic saline infusion during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 83(3):347–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jacobs IG, Finn JC, Jelinek GA et al (2011) Effect of adrenaline on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Resuscitation 82(9):1138–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group (2002) Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 346(8):549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Holzer M (2010) Targeted temperature management for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 363(13):1256–1264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Testori C, Sterz F, Behringer W et al (2011) Mild therapeutic hypothermia is associated with favourable outcome in patients after cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythms. Resuscitation 82(9):1162–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tomte O, Andersen GO, Jacobsen D et al (2011) Strong and weak aspects of an established post-resuscitation treatment protocol-A five-year observational study. Resuscitation 82(9):1186–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fischer M (2011) Die Postreanimationsbehandlung (Post resuscitation care). In: Reanimation – Empfehlungen für die Wiederbelebung. Edited by Bundesärztekammer, Bd. 5, 5. Aufl. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Köln, S 159–173

  37. Wnent J, Seewald S, Heringlake M et al (2012) Choice of hospital after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest – a decision with far-reaching consequences: a study in a large German city. Crit Care 16(5):R164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Grasner JT, Meybohm P, Caliebe A et al (2011) Postresuscitation care with mild therapeutic hypothermia and coronary intervention after out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective registry analysis. Critical care 15(1):R61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Messelken M, Schlechtriemen T (2003) Der minimale Notarztdatensatz MIND2. Notfall Rettungsmed 6(3):189–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Messelken M, Schlechtriemen T, Arntz H et al (2011) Minimal data set in German emergency medicine MIND3 [Der Minimale Notfalldatensatz MIND31]. Notarzt 27:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of interest

M. Fischer declares that he has no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Fischer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, M., Messelken, M., Wnent, J. et al. Deutsches Reanimationsregister der DGAI. Notfall Rettungsmed 16, 251–259 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-013-1694-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-013-1694-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation