Skip to main content
Log in

Diamniotic Conjoined Fetuses in a Triplet Pregnancy: An Insight Into Embryonic Topology

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Pediatric and Developmental Pathology

ABSTRACT

We present a case of triplets, 2 of whom were monochorionic diamniotic conjoined fetuses, and the other triplet was in a separate chorion. The pregnancy followed in vitro fertilization with 2 embryo transfers and the conjoined fetuses developed from a single embryo. An early ultrasound showed 2 embryos attached to 1 yolk sac. Further monitoring of the pregnancy showed these 2 triplets to be diamniotic with a short umbilical cord/body stalk anomaly. After fetal loss a postmortem examination demonstrated that these fetuses were conjoined with a body stalk anomaly/short umbilical cord syndrome with fusion of the coelomic cavities and small bowel (minimally united/conjoined twins). There were dividing amniotic membranes. This case demonstrates the development of an unusual type of conjoined twin with characteristic features. Conjoined fetuses with this pattern have fused small bowel and cloacal anomalies and often diamniotic placentation, when this is recorded. Various terms including minimally united/conjoined omphalopagus/ischiopagus have been used for this characteristic pattern, but this pattern may warrant a specific term. “Diamniotic vitellopagus” may best reflect the pathogenesis of this pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taruffi C. Storia della Teratologica, vol. 2. Bologna: Regia Tipografia, 1882;572–578

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dareste C. Recherches sur la production artificielle des monstruosités ou essais de tératogénie expérimentale, 2nd ed. Paris: C. Reinwald, 1891;433–535

    Google Scholar 

  3. Machin GA. Conjoined twins: implications for blastogenesis. Birth Defects Res 2003;29:141–179

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spencer R. Conjoined Twins: Developmental Malformations and Clinical Implications. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baldwin VJ. Pathology of multiple pregnancy. In: Wigglesworth JS, Singer DB, eds. Textbook of Fetal and Perinatal Pathology. Malden: Blackwell Science, 1998;224–228

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spencer R. Minimally united ischiopagus twins: infraumbilical union with cloacal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:1538–1545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weston PJ, Ives EJ, Honore RL, Lees GM, Sinclair DB, Schiff D. Monochorionic diamniotic minimally conjoined twins: a case report. Am J Med Genet 1990;37:558–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Poenaru D, Uroz-Tristan J, Leclerc S, Murphy S, St-Vil D, Youssef S, Blanchard H. Minimally conjoined omphalopagi: a consistent spectrum of anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:1236–1238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapur RP, Jack RM, Siebert JR. Diamniotic placentation associated with omphalopagus conjoined twins: implications for a contemporary model of conjoined twinning. Am J Med Genet 1994;52:188–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002;346:725–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alikani M, Cekleniak NA, Walters E, Cohen J. Monozygotic twinning following assisted conception: an analysis of 81 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1937–1943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg Y, Ben-Shlomo I, Weiner E, Shalev E. First trimester diagnosis of conjoined twins in a triplet pregnancy after IVF, ICSI: case report. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1413–1415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Skupski DW, Streltzoff J, Hutson JM, Rosenwaks Z, Cohen J, Chervenak FA. Early diagnosis of conjoined twins in triplet pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and assisted hatching. J Ultrasound Med 1995;14:611–615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boulot P, Deschamps F, Hedon B, Laffargue F, Viala JL. Conjoined twins associated with a normal singleton: very early diagnosis and successful selective termination. J Perinat Med 1992;20:135–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldfischer ER, Almond PS, Statter MB, Miller G, Arensman RM, Cromie WJ. Omphalopagus twins with covered cloacal exstrophy. J Urol 1997;157:1004–1005

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cywes S, Millar AJ, Rode H, Brown RA. Conjoined twins—the Cape Town experience. Pediatr Surg Int 1997;12:234–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Walton JM, Gillis DA, Giacomantonio JM, Hayashi AH, Lau HY. Emergency separation of conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:1337–1340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gans SL, Morgenstern L, Gettelman E, Zukow AH, Cooperman H. Separation of conjoined twins in the newborn period. J Pediatr Surg 1968;3:565–574

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zoppini C, Vanzulli A, Kustermann A, Rizzuti T, Selicorni A, Nicolini U. Prenatal diagnosis of anatomical connections in conjoined twins by use of contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 1993;13:995–999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Freedman HL, Tafeen CH, Harris H. Conjoined thoracopagus twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962;84:1904–1909

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Collins J. Notes on a case of twins united by abdominal sac. Trans Pathol Soc Philadelphia 1885–1887;13:276–280

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shih JC, Shyu MK, Hwa SL, Lee CN, Jeng YM, Lin GJ, Hsieh FJ. Concordant body stalk anomaly in monozygotic twinning—early embryo cleavage disorder. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:467–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Daskalakis GJ, Nicolaides KH. Monozygotic twins discordant for body stalk anomaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:79–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gilbert-Barness E, Drut RM, Drut R, Grange DK, Opitz JM. Developmental abnormalities resulting in short umbilical cord. Birth Defects Res 1993;29:113–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yovich JL, Stanger JD, Grauaug A, Barter RA, Lunay G, Dawkins RL, Mulcahy MT. Monozygotic twins from in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1984;41:833–837

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Abusheikha N, Salha O, Sharma V, Brinsden P, Abusheikha N. Monozygotic twinning and IVF/ICSI treatment: a report of 11 cases and review of literature. Hum Reprod 2000;6:396–403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujimori K, Shiroto T, Kuretake S, Gunji H, Sato A. An omphalopagus parasitic twin after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2004;82:1430–1432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schachter M, Raziel A, Friedler S, Strassburger D, Bern O, Ron-El R. Monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive techniques: a phenomenon independent of micromanipulation. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1264–1269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Steinman G. Mechanisms of twinning. VI. Genetics and the etiology of monozygotic twinning in in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Med 2003;48:583–590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the reviewers for their comments and the generous assistance of Dr. Bruce Beckwith in providing a translation of the relevant pages of the Taruffi reference and the relevant extract of the Collins reference and discussing and helping refine the ideas in this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Charles.

Additional information

This case was presented at the Paediatric Pathology Society Meeting; Cape Town, South Africa; April 2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charles, A., Dickinson, J.E., Watson, S. et al. Diamniotic Conjoined Fetuses in a Triplet Pregnancy: An Insight Into Embryonic Topology. Pediatr Dev Pathol 8, 666–672 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10024-005-0009-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10024-005-0009-8

Keywords

Navigation