Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The majority of triple-negative breast cancer may correspond to basal-like carcinoma, but triple-negative breast cancer is not identical to basal-like carcinoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Molecular Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the concept of basal-like carcinoma has been proposed. However, there are only a few reports about the relationship between triple-negative cancer and basal-like carcinoma. In this article, we report the study of the expression of basal cell markers in 11 triple-negative cancers. Eight tumors (4 metaplastic carcinomas, 2 invasive ductal carcinomas, 1 invasive papillary carcinoma, and 1 medullary carcinoma) were positive for more than three markers among cytokeratins 5, 14, and 17, and p63. Three tumors (2 invasive ductal carcinomas and 1 apocrine carcinoma) were completely negative for all markers. Among 8 tumors positive for basal markers, cytokeratins 5 and 17 were expressed in all 8 tumors, cytokeratin 14 in 6 tumors, and p63 in 7 tumors. Finally, we conclude that the majority of triple-negative cancer may correspond to basal-like carcinoma, but the two entities are not identical. The use of combination immunohistochemistry including cytokeratins 5, 14, and 17 and p63 may contribute to the detection of basal-like carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foulkes WD, Stefannsson IM, Chappuis PO, Begin LR, Goffin JR, Wong N, Trudel M, Akslen LA (2003) Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1482–1485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, Korn EL, Long PM, Jazaeri A, Martiat P, Fox SB, Harris AL, Liu ET (2003) Breast cancer classification and progenosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 10393–10398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO (2008) Expression profiling technology: its contribution to our understanding of breast cancer. Histopathology (Oxf) 52:67–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Payne SJL, Bowen RL, Lones JL, Wells CA (2008) Predictive markers in breast cancer: the present. Histopathology (Oxf) 52: 82–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Faratian D, Bartlett J (2008) Predictive markers in breast cancer: the future. Histopathology (Oxf) 52:91–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones C, Ford E, Gillett C, Ryder K, Merrett S, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford LG, Hanby A, Lakhani SR (2004) Molecular cytogenetic identification of subgroups of Grade III invasive ductal breast carcinomas with different clinical outcomes. Clin Cancer Res 10: 5988–5997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnes JB, Brunet JS, Stefansson I, Begin LR, Wong N, Chappuis PO, Akslen LA, Foulkes WD (2005) Placental cadherin and the basal epithelial phenotype of BRCA1-related breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11:4003–4011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ribeiro-Silva A, Ramalho LNZ, Garcia SB, Brandao DF, Chahud F, Zucoloto S (2005) p63 correlates with both BRCA1 and cytokeratin 5 in invasive breast carcinomas: further evidence for the pathogenesis of the basal phenotype of breast cancer. Histopathology (Oxf) 47:458–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsuda H, Morita D, Kimura M, Shinto E, Ohtsuka Y, Matsubara O, Inazawa J, Tamaki K, Mochizuki H, Tamai S, Hiraide H (2005) Correlation of KIT and EGFR overexpression with invasive ductal breast carcinoma of the solid-tubular subtype, nuclear grade 3, and mesenchymal or myoepithelial differentiation. Cancer Sci 96:48–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leibl S, Gogg-Kammerer M, Sommersacher A, Denk H, Maoinfar F (2005) Metaplastic breast carcinomas: are they of myoepithelial differentiation? Immunohistochemical prolife of the sarcomatoid subtype using novel myoepithelial markers. Am J Surg Pathol 29:347–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fulford LG, Easton DF, Reis-Filho JS, Sofronis A, Gillett CE, Lakhan SR, Hanby A (2006) Specific morphological features predictive for the basal phenotype in grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. Histopathology (Oxf) 49:22–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shien T, Tashiro T, Omatsu M, Matsuda T, Furuta K, Sato N, Akashi-Tanaka S, Uehara M, Iwamoto E, Kinoshita T, Fukutomi T, Tsuda H, Hasegawa T (2006) Frequent overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in mammary high grade ductal carcinomas with myoepithelial differentiation. J Clin Pathol 58:1299–1304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim MJ, Ro JY, Ahn SH, Kim HH, Kim SB, Gong G (2006) Clinicopathologic significance of the basal-like subtype of breast cancer: a comparison with hormone receptor and Her 2/neuoverexpressing phenotypes. Hum Pathol 37:1217–1226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fadare O, Tavassoli FA (2007) The phenotypic spectrum of basal-like breast cancers: a critical appraisal. Adv Anat Pathol 14: 358–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fadare O, Yeh IT (2007) Basal-like breast cancers. Pathol Case Rev 12:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diaz LK, Cryns VL, Symmans F, Sneige N (2007) Triple negative breast carcinoma and the basal phenotype: from expression profiling to clinical practice. Adv Anat Pathol 14:419–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reis-Filho JS, Tutt AN (2008) Triple negative tumours: a critical review. Histopathology (Oxf) 52:108–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (eds) Tumours of the breast and female genital organs. World Health Organization classification of tumours. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 10–80

  19. Kuroda N, Fujishima N, Inoue K, Ohara M, Hirouchi T, Mizuno K, Hayashi Y, Lee GH (2008) Basal-like carcinoma of the breast: further evidence of the possibility that most metaplastic carcinomas may be actually basal-like carcinoma. Med Mol Morphol 41:117–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoto Kuroda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuroda, N., Ohara, M., Inoue, K. et al. The majority of triple-negative breast cancer may correspond to basal-like carcinoma, but triple-negative breast cancer is not identical to basal-like carcinoma. Med Mol Morphol 42, 128–131 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00795-008-0428-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00795-008-0428-5

Key words

Navigation