Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Telematisch unterstützte Interventionen in der Onkologie

Was bringen sie?

Computer aided interventions in oncology

Are they really worth it?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Onkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Telematisch gestützte Interventionen finden eine breite Anwendung in allen Bereichen der modernen Onkologie. Neben intraoperativen Navigationsverfahren, welche v. a. in der Leberchirurgie und Neurochirurgie Bedeutung erlangen konnten, stellt die Robotik einen weiteren Schwerpunkt dar. Aber auch bei perkutanen und transluminalen Therapieverfahren ist eine Unterstützung durch telematische Systeme nicht mehr wegzudenken. Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die aktuellen Einsatzbereiche telematischer gestützter Interventionen in der Onkologie und versucht diese jeweils hinsichtlich ihres effektiven Nutzens zu bewerten.

Abstract

Nowadays, computer aided interventions are increasingly applied in different fields of oncology. Beside intraoperative navigation systems, mainly used for liver and brain surgery, robotic assisted interventions represent another key aspect. Moreover, also in percutaneous and transluminal therapeutic interventions, telematic support is strongly recommended and helpful. In this article we aimed to give an overview on the different fields of computer aided interventions in oncology, while it is also intended to balance out its effective value in tumor therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Yamanaka J, Saito S, Fujimoto J (2007) Impact of preoperative planning using virtual segmental volumetry on liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 31(6):1249–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kishi Y, Abdalla EK, Chun YS et al (2009) Three hundred and one consecutive extended right hepatectomies: evaluation of outcome based on systematic liver volumetry. Ann Surg 250(4):540–548

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M et al (2005) Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg 140(7):629–638; discussion 638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lang H, Schenk A (2011) Planung von Leberresektionen. Schlag, Eulenstein, Lange – Computerassistierte. Elsevier, Chirurgie 1:515–524

  5. Brommeland T, Hennig R (2000) A new procedure for frameless computer navigated stereotaxy. Acta Neurochir 142(4):443–447; discussion 447–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Witterick I, Gentili F (2009) Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base and suprasellar lesions: indications and limitations. Neurosurgery 64(4):677–687; discussion 687–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cash DM, Miga MI, Glasgow SC et al (2007) Concepts and preliminary data toward the realization of image-guided liver surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11(7):844–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beller S, Hunerbein M, Eulenstein S et al (2007) Feasibility of navigated resection of liver tumors using multiplanar visualization of intraoperative 3-dimensional ultrasound data. Ann Surg 246(2):288–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beller S, Eulenstein S, Lange T et al (2009) Upgrade of an optical navigation system with a permanent electromagnetic position control: a first step towards „navigated control“ for liver surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16(2):165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Senft C, Ulrich CT, Seifert V, Gasser T (2010) Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the surgical treatment of cerebral metastases. J Surg Oncol 101(5):436–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan TC, Black PM (2007) Image-guided craniotomy for cerebral metastases: techniques and outcomes. Neurosurgery 61(1 Suppl):349–356; discussion 356–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wendler T, Herrmann K, Schnelzer A et al (2010) First demonstration of 3-D lymphatic mapping in breast cancer using freehand SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(8):1452–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Venkatesan AM, Kadoury S, Abi-Jaoudeh N et al (2011) Real-time FDG PET guidance during biopsies and radiofrequency ablation using multimodality fusion with electromagnetic navigation. Radiology 260(3):848–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang SK, Hlaing WW, Yang L, Chui CK (2011) Current technology in navigation and robotics for liver tumours ablation. Ann Acad Med Singapore 40(5):231–236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hildebrand P, Kleemann M, Schlichting S et al (2009) Prototype of an online navigation system for laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation. Hepatogastroenterology 56(96):1710–1713

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jang HJ, Lee JY, Lee DH et al (2010) Current and Future Clinical Applications of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for Pancreatic Cancer. Gut Liver 4(Suppl 1):S57–S61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Inoue Y, Goto K, Hayashi T, Hayashi M (2011) Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Int J Urol 18(5):358–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hautmann H, Schneider A, Pinkau T et al (2005) Electromagnetic catheter navigation during bronchoscopy: validation of a novel method by conventional fluoroscopy. Chest 128(1):382–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gildea TR, Mazzone PJ, Karnak D et al (2006) Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174(9):982–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1480–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leong QM, Kim SH (2011) Robot-assisted rectal surgery for malignancy: a review of current literature. Ann Acad Med Singapore 40(10):460–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R et al (2012) Robotic compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 14(4):134–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Clark J, Sodergren MH, Purkayastha S et al (2011) The role of robotic assisted laparoscopy for oesophagogastric oncological resection; an appraisal of the literature. Dis Esophagus 24(4):240–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buchs NC, Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2011) Robot-assisted gastrectomy for cancer. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 57(1):33–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoon HM, Kim YW, Lee JH et al (2011) Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc (Epub ahead of print)

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland

    D. Wilhelm, M. Kranzfelder, M. Bauer & H. Feussner

  2. Forschungsgruppe MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, München, Deutschland

    D. Wilhelm, M. Kranzfelder, A. Fiolka, M. Bauer & H. Feussner

Authors
  1. D. Wilhelm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Kranzfelder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Fiolka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Feussner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Wilhelm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilhelm, D., Kranzfelder, M., Fiolka, A. et al. Telematisch unterstützte Interventionen in der Onkologie. Onkologe 18, 419–424 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-012-2238-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-012-2238-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation