Abstract
A phylogenetic alignment differs from other forms of multiple sequence alignment because it must align homologous features. Therefore, the goal of the alignment procedure should be to identify the events associated with the homologies, so that the aligned sequences accurately reflect those events. That is, an alignment is a set of hypotheses about historical events rather than about residues, and any alignment algorithm must be designed to identify and align such events. Some events (e.g., substitution) involve single residues, and our current algorithms can successfully align those events when sequence similarity is great enough. However, the other common events (such as duplication, translocation, deletion, insertion and inversion) can create complex sequence patterns that defeat such algorithms. There is therefore currently no computerized algorithm that can successfully align molecular sequences for phylogenetic analysis, except under restricted circumstances. Manual re-alignment of a preliminary alignment is thus the only feasible contemporary methodology, although it should be possible to automate such a procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahola V, Aittokallio T, Vihinen M, Uusipaikka E (2006) A statistical score for assessing the quality of multiple sequence alignments. BMC Bioinform 7:484
Baron M, Norman D, Willis A, Campbell ID (1990) Structure of the fibronectin type I module. Nature 345:642–646
Barta JR (1997) Investigating phylogenetic relationships within the Apicomplexa using sequence data: the search for homology. Methods 13:81–88
Beebe NW, Cooper RD, Morrison DA, Ellis JT (2000) Subset partitioning of the ribosomal DNA small subunit and its effects on the phylogeny of the Anopheles punctulatus group. Insect Molec Biol 9:515–520
Bertrand D, Gascuel O (2005) Topological rearrangements and local search method for tandem duplication trees. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2:15–28
Blanchette M, Kent WJ, Riemer C, Elnitski L, Smit AFA, Roskin KM, Baertsch R, Rosenbloom K, Clawson H, Green ED, Haussler D, Miller W (2004) Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the Threaded Blockset Aligner. Genome Res 14:708–715
Borsch T, Hilu KW, Quandt D, Wilde V, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (2003) Noncoding plastid trnT–trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms. J Evol Biol 16:558–576
Borsch T, Hilu KW, Wiersema JH, Löhne C, Barthlott W, Wilde V (2007) Phylogeny of Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae): evidence from substitutions and microstructural changes in the chloroplast trnT–trnF region. Int J Plant Sci 168:639–671
Bray N, Pachter L (2004) MAVID: constrained ancestral alignment of multiple sequences. Genome Res 14:693–699
Brower AVZ, Schawaroch V (1996) Three steps of homology assessment. Cladistics 12:265–272
Brudno M, Do CB, Cooper GM, Kim MF, Davydov E, Green ED, Sidow A, Batzoglou S (2003a) LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res 13:721–731
Brudno M, Malde S, Poliakov A, Do CB, Couronne O, Dubchak I, Batzoglou S (2003b) Glocal alignment: finding rearrangements during alignment. Bioinformatics 19:i54–i62
Cammarano P, Creti R, Sanangelantoni AM, Palm P (1999) The Archaea monophyly issue: a phylogeny of translational elongation factor g(2) sequences inferred from an optimized selection of alignment positions. J Molec Evol 49:524–537
Cannone JJ, Subramanian S, Schnare MN, Collett JR, D’Souza LM, Du Y, Feng B, Lin N, Madabusi LV, Muller KM, Pande N, Shang Z, Yu N, Gutell RR (2002) The comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinform 3:2
Cartmill M (1994) A critique of homology as a morphological concept. Am J Physical Anthropol 94:115–123
Castresana J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molec Biol Evol 17:540–552
Charleston MA (1998) Jungles: a new solution to the host/parasite phylogeny reconciliation problem. Math Biosci 149:191–223
Colbourn CJ, Kumar S (2007) Lower bounds on multiple sequence alignment using exact 3-way alignment. BMC Bioinform 8:140
Creer S (2007) Choosing and using introns in molecular phylogenetics. Evol Bioinform 3:99–108
Damberger SH, Gutell RR (1994) A comparative database of group I intron structures. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3508–3510
Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT (2004) Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 14:1394–1403
Dessimoz C, Cannarozzi GM, Gil M, Margadant D, Roth A, Schneider A, Gonnet GH (2005) OMA, A comprehensive, automated project for the identification of orthologs from complete genome data: introduction and first achievements. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3678:61–72
de Pinna MCC (1991) Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7:367–394
Dewey CN, Pachter L (2006) Evolution at the nucleotide level: the problem of multiple whole-genome alignment. Human Molec Genet 15:R51–R56
Do CB, Mahabhashyam MSP, Brudno M, Batzoglou S (2005) ProbCons: probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res 15:330–340
Dobzhansky T (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teacher 35:125–129
Dopazo J (1997) A new index to find regions showing an unexpected variability or conservation in sequence alignments. Comput Appl Biosc 13:313–317
Du Z, Lin F (2007) Pattern-constrained multiple polypeptide sequence alignment. Comput Biol Chem 29:303–307
Ellis J, Morrison D (1995) Effects of sequence alignment on the phylogeny of Sarcocystis deduced from 18S rDNA sequences. Parasitol Res 81:696–699
Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Böckler B, Griffiths-Jones S, Hollich V, Lassmann T, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Sonnhammer ELL, Bateman A (2006) Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D247–D251
Fleissner R, Metzler D, von Haeseler A (2005) Simultaneous statistical multiple alignment and phylogeny reconstruction. Syst Biol 54:548–561
Frith MC, Hansen U, Spouge JL, Weng Z (2004) Finding functional sequence elements by multiple local alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 32:189–200
Gillespie JJ (2004) Characterizing regions of ambiguous alignment caused by the expansion and contraction of hairpin-stem loops in ribosomal RNA molecules. Molec Phylogenet Evol 33:936–943
Gillespie JJ, Yoder MJ, Wharton RA (2005) Predicted secondary structure for 28S and 18S rRNA from Ichneumonoidea (Insecta:Hymenoptera:Apocrita): impact on sequence alignment and phylogeny estimation. J Molec Evol 61:114–137
Giribet G, Edgecombe GD, Wheeler WC (2001) Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413:157–160
Golenberg EM, Clegg MT, Durbin ML, Doebley J, Ma DP (1993) Evolution of a noncoding region of the chloroplast genome. Molec Phylogen Evol 2:52–64
Golubchik T, Wise MJ, Eastel S, Jermiin LS (2007) Mind the gaps: evidence of bias in estimates of multiple sequence alignments. Mol Biol Evol 24:2433–2442
Goode MG, Rodrigo AG (2007) SQUINT: a multiple alignment program and editor. Bioinformatics 23:1553–1555
Graham SW, Reeves PA, Burns ACE, Olmstead RG (2000) Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. Int J Plant Sci 161:S83–S96
Grundy WN, Naylor GJP (1999) Phylogenetic inference from conserved alignments. J Exp Zool 285:128–139
He Y, Jones J, Armstrong M, Lamberti F, Moens M (2005) The mitochondrial genome of Xiphinema americanum sensu stricto (Nematoda: Enoplea): considerable economization in the length and structural features of encoded genes. J Molec Evol 61:819–833
Henikoff S, Henikoff JG, Alford WJ, Pietrokovski S (1995) Automated construction and graphical presentation of protein blocks from unaligned sequences. Gene 163:GC17–GC26
Hertwig S, de Sá RO, Haas A (2004) Phylogenetic signal and the utility of 12S and 16S mtDNA in frog phylogeny. J Zool Syst Evol Res 42:2–18
Hickson RE, Simon C, Cooper A, Spicer GS, Sullivan J, Penny D (1996) Conserved sequence motifs, alignment, and secondary structure for the third domain of animal 12S rRNA. Molec Biol Evol 13:150–169
Höhl M, Kurtz S, Ohlebusch E (2002) Efficient multiple genome alignment. Bioinformatics 18:S312–S320
Höhl M, Ragan MA (2007) Is multiple-sequence alignment required for accurate inference of phylogeny? Syst Biol 56:206–221
Hoot SB, Douglas AW (1998) Phylogeny of the Proteaceae based on atpB and atpB–rbcL intergenic spacer region sequences. Aust Syst Bot 11:301–320
Jansen RK, Kaittanis C, Saski C, Lee S-B, Tomkins J, Alverson AJ, Daniell H (2006) Phylogenetic analysis of Vitis (Vitaceae) based on complete chloroplast genome sequences: effects of taxon sampling and phylogenetic methods on resolving relationships among rosids. BMC Evol. Biol 6:32
Jermiin LS, Ho SYW, Ababneh F, Robinson J, Larkum AWD (2004) The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst Biol 53:638–643
Johnson R (1982) Parsimony principles in phylogenetic systematics: a critical re-appraisal. Evol Theory 6:79–90
Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33:511–518
Kauff F, Cox CJ, Lutzoni F (2007) WASABI: an automated sequence processing system for multigene phylogenies. Syst Biol 56:523–531
Keightley PD, Johnson T (2004) MCALIGN: stochastic alignment of noncoding DNA sequences based on an evolutionary model of sequence evolution. Genome Res 14:442–450
Kelchner SA (2000) The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 87:482–498
Kelchner SA (2002) Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: structure, function, and evolutionary constraints. Amer J Bot 89:1651–1669
Kelchner SA, Clark LG (1997) Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast rpl16 intron in Chusquea and the Bambusoideae (Poaceae). Molec Phylogenet Evol 8:385–397
Kelchner SA, Wendel JF (1996) Hairpins create minute inversions in non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Curr Genet 30:259–262
Kellogg EA, Juliano ND (1997) The structure and function of RuBisCo and their implications for systematic studies. Am J Bot 84:413–428
Kim J, Sinha S (2007) Indelign: a probabilistic framework for annotation of insertions and deletions in a multiple alignment. Bioinformatics 23:289–297
Kiryu H, Tabei Y, Kin T, Asai K (2007) Murlet: a practical multiple alignment tool for structural RNA sequences. Bioinformatics 23:1588–1598
Kjer KM (1995) Use of rRNA secondary structure in phylogenetic studies to identify homologous positions: an example of alignment and data presentation from the frogs. Molec Phylogenet Evol 4:314–330
Kjer KM (1997) An alignment template for amphibian 12S rRNA, domain III: conserved primary and secondary structural motifs. J. Herpetol 31:599–604
Kjer KM, Baldridge GD, Fallon AM (1994) Mosquito large subunit ribosomal RNA: simultaneous alignment of primary and secondary structure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1217:147–155
Kjer KM, Gillespie JJ, Ober KA (2006) Structural homology in ribosomal RNA, and a deliberation on POY. Arthropod Syst Phylogeny 64:159–164
Kjer KM, Gillespie JJ, Ober KA (2007) Opinions on multiple sequence alignment, and an empirical comparison of repeatability and accuracy between POY and structural alignment. Syst Biol 56:133–146
Kreitman M (1983) Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 304:412–417
Kumar S, Filipski A (2007) Multiple sequence alignment: in pursuit of homologous DNA positions. Genome Res 17:127–135
Lambert C, Van Campenhout J-M, DeBolle X, Depiereux E (2003) Review of common sequence alignment methods: clues to enhance reliability. Curr Genom 4:131–146
Landan G, Graur D (2007) Heads or tails: a simple reliability check for multiple sequence alignments. Molec Biol Evol 24:1380–1383
Lassmann T, Sonnhammer ELL (2005) Automatic assessment of alignment quality. Nucleic Acids Res 33:7120–7128
Lawrence CE, Altschul SF, Boguski MS, Liu JS, Neuwald AF, Wootton JC (1993) Detecting subtle sequence signals: a Gibbs sampling strategy for multiple alignment. Science 262:208–214
Lawrence CJ, Zmasek CM, Dawe RK, Malmberg RL (2004) LumberJack: a heuristic tool for sequence alignment exploration and phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 20:1977–1979
Lebrun E, Santini JM, Brugna M, Ducluzeau A-L, Ouchane S, Schoepp-Cothenet B, Baymann F, Nitschke W (2006) The rieske protein: a case study on the pitfalls of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic reconstruction. Molec Biol Evol 23:1180–1191
Letunic I, Copley RR, Schmidt S, Ciccarelli FD, Doerks T, Schultz J, Ponting CP, Bork O (2004) SMART 4.0: towards genomic data integration. Nucleic Acids Res 32:142–144
Ljunggren EL, Bergström K, Morrison DA, Mattsson JG (2006) Characterisation of an atypical antigen from Sarcoptes scabiei containing an MADF domain. Parasitology 132:117–126
Löhne C, Borsch T (2005) Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the petD Group II intron: a case study in basal angiosperms. Molec Biol Evol 22:317–332
Löytynoja A, Goldman N (2005) An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10557–10562
Löytynoja A, Milinkovitch MC (2001) SOAP, cleaning multiple alignments from unstable blocks. Bioinformatics 17:573–574
Löytynoja A, Milinkovitch MC (2003) A hidden markov model for progressive multiple alignment. Bioinformatics 19:1505–1513
Lunter G (2007) Probabilistic whole-genome alignments reveal high indel rates in the human and mouse genomes. Bioinformatics 23:i289–i296
Lunter G, Drummond AJ, Miklós I, Hein J (2005) Statistical alignment: recent progress, new applications, and challenges. In: Nielsen R (ed) Statistical methods in molecular evolution. Springer, New York, pp 375–405
Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Cherukuri PF, DeWeese-Scott C, Geer LY, Gwadz M, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Lanczycki C, Liebert CA, Liu C, Lu F, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Shoemaker BA, Simonyan V, Song JS, Thiessen PA, Yamashita RA, Yin JJ, Zhang D, Bryant SH (2005) CDD: a conserved domain database for protein classification. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D192–D196
Martin MJ, González-Candelas F, Sobrino F, Dopazo J (1995) A method for determining the position and size of optimal sequence regions for phylogenetic analysis. J Molec Evol 41:1128–1138
Martin W, Roettger M, Lockhart PJ (2007) A reality check for alignments and trees. Trends Genet 23:478–480
May ACW (2004) Percent sequence identity: the need to be explicit. Structure 12:737–738
Messer PW, Arndt PF (2007) The majority of recent short DNA insertions in the human genome are tandem duplications. Molec Biol Evol 24:1190–1197
Mishler BD (2005) The logic of the data matrix in phylogenetic analysis. In: Albert VA (ed) Parsimony, phylogeny, and genomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 57–70
Morrison DA (2006) Multiple sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes. Aust Syst Bot 19:479–539
Morrison DA, Bornstein S, Thebo P, Wernery U, Kinne J, Mattsson JG (2004) The current status of the small subunit rRNA: phylogeny of the coccidia (Sporozoa). Int J Parasitol 34:501–514
Morrison DA, Ellis JT (1997) Effects of nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny estimation: a case study of 18S rDNAs of Apicomplexa. Molec Biol Evol 14:428–441
Müller K, Borsch T (2005a) Phylogenetics of Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae) and molecular evolution of the trnK intron in a lineage with high substitutional rates. Plant Syst Evol 250:39–67
Müller K, Borsch T (2005b) Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data—evidence from parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian methods. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 92:66–102
Mugridge NB, Morrison DA, Jäkel T, Heckeroth AR, Tenter AM, Johnson AM (2000) Effects of sequence alignment and structural domains of ribosomal DNA on phylogeny reconstruction for the protozoan family Sarcocystidae. Molec Biol Evol 17:1842–1853
Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J (2000) T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Molec Biol 302:205–217
Notredame C, Holm L, Higgins DG (1998) COFFEE: an objective function for multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 14:407–422
O’Brien EA, Higgins DG (1998) Empirical estimation of the reliability of ribosomal RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 14:830–838
O’Dushlaine CT, Shields DC (2006) Tools for the identification of variable and potentially variable tandem repeats. BMC Genom 7:290
Ogden TH, Rosenberg MS (2006) Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and phylogenetic inference. Syst Biol 55:314–328
Ogden TH, Rosenberg MS (2007) Alignment and topological accuracy of the direct optimization approach via POY and traditional phylogenetics via ClustalW + PAUP*. Syst Biol 56:182–193
Papadopoulos JS, Agarwala R (2007) COBALT: constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics 23:1073–1079
Patterson C (1988) Homology in classical and molecular biology. Molec Biol Evol 5:603–625
Pei J, Grishin NV (2001) AL2CO: calculation of positional conservation in a protein sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 17:700–712
Pei J, Grishin NV (2007) PROMALS: towards accurate multiple sequence alignments of distantly related proteins. Bioinformatics 23:802–808
Phillips A, Janies D, Wheeler W (2000) Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis. Molec Phylogen Evol 16:317–330
Phuong TM, Do CB, Edgar RC, Batzoglou S (2006) Multiple alignment of protein sequences with repeats and rearrangements. Nucleic Acids Res 34:5932–5942
Pöhler D, Werner N, Steinkamp R, Morgenstern B (2005) Multiple alignment of genomic sequences using CHAOS, DIALIGN and ABC. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W532–W534
Pollard DA, Bergman CM, Stoye J, Celniker SE, Eisen MB (2004) Benchmarking tools for the alignment of functional noncoding DNA. BMC Bioinform 5:6
Pons J, Vogler AP (2006) Size, frequency, and phylogenetic signal of multiple-residue indels in sequence alignment of introns. Cladistics 22:144–156
Prychitko TM, Moore WS (2003) Alignment and phylogenetic analysis of β-fibrinogen intron 7 sequences among avian orders reveal conserved regions within the intron. Mol Biol Evol 20:762–771
Quandt D, Müller K, Huttunen S (2003) Characterisation of the chloroplast DNA psbT-H region and the influence of dyad symmetrical events on phylogenetic reconstructions. Pl Biol 5:400–410
Quandt D, Müller K, Stech M, Frahm J-P, Frey W, Hiku KW, Borsch T (2004) Molecular evolution of the chloroplast trnL-F region in land plants. In: Goffinet B, Hollowell V, Magill R (eds) Molecular systematics of bryophytes. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St Louis, pp 13–37
Raphael B, Zhi D, Tang H, Pevzner P (2004) A novel method for multiple alignment of sequences with repeated and shuffled elements. Genome Res 14:2336–2346
Redelings BD, Suchard MA (2005) Joint bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny. Syst Biol 54:401–418
Ronquist F (2003) Parsimony analysis of coevolving species associations. In: Page RDM (ed) Phylogeny, cospeciation and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 22–64
Sammeth M, Heringa J (2006) Global multiple-sequence alignment with repeats. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 64:263–274
Sammeth M, Stoye J (2006) Comparing tandem repeats with duplications and excisions of variable degree. IEEE/ACM Trans Computat Biol Bioinform 3:395–407
Sankoff D, Morel C, Cedergren RJ (1973) Evolution of 5S RNA and the non-randomness of base replacement. Nature 245:232–234
Sanson GFO, Kawashita SY, Brunstein A, Briones MRS (2002) Experimental phylogeny of neutrally evolving DNA sequences generated by a bifurcate series of nested polymerase chain reactions. Mol Biol Evol 19:170–178
Schultz J, Maisel S, Gerlach D, Müller T, Wolf M (2005) A common core of secondary structure of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) throughout the Eukaryota. RNA 11:361–364
Schwartz S, Elnitski L, Li M, Weirauch M, Riemer C, Smit A (2003) MultiPipMaker and supporting tools: alignments and analysis of multiple genomic DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3518–3524
Seibel PN, Müller T, Dandekar T, Schultz J, Wolf M (2006) 4SALE—a tool for synchronous RNA sequence and secondary structure alignment and editing. BMC Bioinform 7:498
Shan Y, Milios EE, Roger AJ, Blouin C, Susko E (2003) Automatic recognition of regions of intrinsically poor multiple alignment using machine learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society second conference in bioinformatics (CSB’03). IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 482–483
Shih AC-C, Lee DT, Lin L, Peng C-L, Chen S-H, Wu Y-W, Wong C-Y, Chou M-Y, Shiao T-C, Hsieh M-F (2006) SinicView: a visualization environment for comparisons of multiple nucleotide sequence alignment tools. BMC Bioinform 7:103
Simmons MP (2004) Independence of alignment and tree search. Molec Phylogenet Evol 31:874–879
Smith HO, Annau TM, Chandrasegaran S (1990) Finding sequence motifs in groups of functionally related proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:826–830
Stebbings LA, Mizuguchi K (2004) HOMSTRAD: recent developments of the homologous protein structure alignment database. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D203–D207
Suchard MA, Redelings BD (2006) BAli-Phy: simultaneous bayesian inference of alignment and phylogeny. Bioinformatics 22:2047–2048
Szklarczyk R, Heringa J (2006) AuberGene—a sensitive genome alignment tool. Bioinformatics 22:1431–1436
Szymanski M, Erdmann VA, Barciszewski J (2007) Noncoding RNAs database (ncRNAdb). Nucleic Acids Res 35:D162–D164
Talavera G, Castresana J (2007) Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol 56:564–577
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680
Thompson JD, Plewniak F, Ripp R, Thierry J-C, Poch O (2001) Towards a reliable objective function for multiple sequence alignments. J Molec Biol 314:937–951
Torarinsson E, Havgaard JH, Gorodkin J (2007) Multiple structural alignment and clustering of RNA sequences. Bioinformatics 23:926–932
Vingron M (1996) Near-optimal sequence alignment. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6:346–352
Wegner K, Jansen S, Wuchty S, Gauges R, Kummer U (2004) CombAlign: a protein sequence comparison algorithm considering recombinations. In Silico Biol 4:0021
Whelan S, de Bakker PIW, Quevillon E, Rodriguez N, Goldman N (2006) PANDIT: an evolution-centric database of protein and associated nucleotide domains with inferred trees. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D327–D331
Wheeler TJ, Kececioglu JD (2007) Multiple alignment by aligning alignments. Bioinformatics 23:i559–i568
Wheeler W (1996) Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics 12:1–9
Wheeler WC (1999) Fixed character states and the optimization of molecular sequence data. Cladistics 15:379–385
Wheeler WC (2006) Dynamic homology and the likelihood criterion. Cladistics 22:157–170
Wilm A, Mainz I, Steger G (2006) An enhanced RNA alignment benchmark for sequence alignment programs. Algorithms Molec Biol 1:19
Xiao L, Sulaiman IM, Ryan UM, Zhou L, Atwill ER, Tischler ML, Zhang X, Fayer R, Lal AA (2002) Host adaptation and host-parasite co-evolution in Cryptosporidium: implications for taxonomy and public health. Int J Parasitol 32:1773–1785
Xu X, Ji Y, Stormo GD (2007) RNA Sampler: a new sampling based algorithm for common RNA secondary structure prediction and structural alignment. Bioinformatics 23:1883–1891
Yao Z, Weinberg Z, Ruzzo WL (2006) CMfinder—a covariance model based RNA motif finding algorithm. Bioinformatics 22:445–452
Ye L, Huang X (2005) MAP2: multiple alignment of syntenic genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 33:162–170
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morrison, D.A. A framework for phylogenetic sequence alignment. Plant Syst Evol 282, 127–149 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-008-0072-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-008-0072-5