Abstract
Introduction
Decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most frequent operations on the spine today. The most common complication seems to be a peroperative dural lesion. There are few prospective studies on this complication regarding incidence and effect on long-term outcome; this is the background for the current study.
Materials and methods
Swespine, the Swedish Spine Register documents the majority (>80%) of lumbar spine operations in Sweden today. Within the framework of this register, totally 3,699 operations for spinal stenosis during a 5-year period were studied regarding complications and 1-year postoperative outcome. Mean patient age was 66 (37–92) years and 44% were males. Fourteen percent were smokers and 19% had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery.
Results
The overall incidence of a peroperative dural lesion was 7.4%, 8.5% of patients undergoing decompressive surgery only and 5.5% of patients undergoing decompressive surgery + fusion (p < 0.001). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that (high) age (p < 0.0004), previous surgery (p < 0.036) and smoking (p < 0.049) were significantly predictive factors for dural lesions. An odds ratio estimate demonstrated an age-related risk increase with 2.7% per year. The risk for dural lesions also increased with number of levels decompressed. The 1-year outcome was identical in the two groups with and without a dural lesion.
Conclusion
A dural lesion was seen in 7.4% of decompressive operations for spinal stenosis. High age, previous surgery and smoking were risk factors for sustaining a lesion, which, however, did not affect the 1-year outcome negatively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30(8):936–943
Cain JE Jr, Lauermann WC, Rosenthal HG, Broom MJ, Jacobs RR (1991) The histomorphologic sequence of dural repair. Observations in the canine model. Spine 16(Suppl):S319–S323
Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Sangani PK, Parvataneni HK, Cadag S, Sandhu HS (2000) Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine 25(20):2663–2667
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ, Ciol MA (1992) Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine: the influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Jt Surg Am A 74:536–543
Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG (2011) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303(13):1259–1265
Eismont FJ, Wiesel SW, Rothman RH (1981) Treatment of dural tears associated with spinal surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am A 63:1132–1136
Fu KMG, Smith JS, Polly DW Jr, Perra JH, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp DR Jr, Hart RA, Zeller RD, Donaldson WF III, Boachie-Adjei O, Shaffrey CI (2010) Morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of 10, 329 adults with degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 12:443–446
Jones AA, Stambough JL, Balderston RA, Rothman RH, Booth RE (1989) Long-term results of lumbar spine surgery complicated by unintended incidental durotomy. Spine 14(4):443–446
Jönsson B, Sjöberg C, Annertz M, Strömqvist B (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 22(24):2938–2944
Kitchel SH, Eismont FJ, Green BA (1989) Closed subarachnoid drainage for management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after an operation on the spine. J Bone Jt Surg Am A 71:984–987
Sin AH, Caldito G, Smith D, Rashidi M, Willis B, Nanda A (2006) Predictive factors for dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid leakage in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 5:224–227
Stewart G, Sachs BL (1996) Patient outcomes after reoperation on the lumbar spine. J Bone Jt Surg Am A 78:706–711
Stolke D, Sollman WP, Seifert V (1989) Intra- and postoperative complications in lumbar disc surgery. Spine 14:56–59
Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jönsson B (2005) One-year report from the Swedish National Spine Register. Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons. Acta Orthop 76(Suppl 319):1–24
Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jönsson B, Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons (2009) The Swedish Spine Register: development, design and utility. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):S294–S304
Strömqvist F, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B (2010) Dural lesions in lumbar disc herniation surgery: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Eur Spine J 19:439–442
Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, Wöhrle J, Schmiedek P (2005) Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 3:129–141
Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8
Wang JC, Bohlman HH, Riew KD (1998) Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am A 80:1728–1732
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Hanscom B, Skinner JS, Abdu WA, Hilibrand AS, Boden SD, Deyo RA (2006) Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA 296:2441–2450
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, AnH SPORT investigators (2008) Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. New Engl J Med 358(8):794–810
Acknowledgments
The authors highly appreciate statistical help and advice given by Caddie Zhou at the National Centre for Quality Registers, Lund Sweden. The economical funding by the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) is also acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strömqvist, F., Jönsson, B., Strömqvist, B. et al. Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome. Eur Spine J 21, 825–828 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2101-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2101-2