Abstract
Purpose
Because the safety of intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (iv-PCA) administered during labor remains unclear, we retrospectively examined the labor records from January 2005 to December 2007 in our institution, with a focus on both maternal and neonatal outcomes, as compared to no analgesia.
Methods
Parturients over 35 weeks of gestational age who received fentanyl iv-PCA (iv-PCA group) or no analgesia (control group) during labor were enrolled. The former group received iv-PCA through a pump programmed to give a loading dose of 0.05 mg fentanyl, followed by bolus injection of 0.02 mg fentanyl, with a lock-out interval of 5 min. This analgesia was initiated at the parturient’s request and was discontinued before the second stage of labor, to ensure neonatal safety. During labor, both maternal and fetal heart rates, maternal pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate, and sedation and nausea scores were continuously monitored, and the neonatal outcomes including umbilical arterial pH, Apgar scores, and other parameters were recorded.
Results
The data of 129 of the 143 parturients who received fentanyl iv-PCA were analyzed, while 697 parturients delivered without any analgesia during the 3-year study period. While iv-PCA prolonged the duration of labor and increased oxytocin use, no obvious maternal or neonatal complications of fentanyl use were recorded. Except for the significantly lower rate of emergency cesarean section in the iv-PCA group, both the maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the groups.
Conclusions
As compared to no analgesia, fentanyl iv-PCA appears to be safe and clinically acceptable as analgesia during labor, particularly in nulliparous women.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Camann W. Pain relief during labor. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:718–20.
Fun W, Lew E, Sia AT. Advances in neuraxial blocks for labor analgesia: new techniques, new systems. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2008;74:77–85.
Goetzl LM, ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guideline for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 36, July 2002. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:177–91.
Hill D. The use of remifentanil in obstetrics. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26:169–82.
Halpern SH, Muir H, Breen TW, Breen TW, Campbell DC, Barrett J, Liston R, Blanchard JW. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing patient-controlled epidural with intravenous analgesia for pain relief in labor. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1532–8.
Reynolds F, Sharma SK, Seed PT. Analgesia in labour and fetal acid-base balance: a meta-analysis comparing epidural with systemic opioid analgesia. BJOG. 2002;109:1344–53.
Gouyon JB, Vintejoux A, Sagot P, Burguet A, Quantin C, Fredynus C, the Burgundy Perinatal Network. Neonatal outcome associated with singleton birth at 34–41 weeks of gestation. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:769–76.
Nikkola EM, Ekblad UU, Kero PO, Alihanka JJ, Salonen MA. Intravenous fentanyl PCA during labour. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44:1248–55.
Victory R, Penava D, Da Silva O, Natale R, Richardson B. Umbilical cord pH and base excess values in relation to adverse outcome events for infants delivering at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:2021–8.
Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hershkovitz R, Katz M, Mazor M. Infertility treatment is an independent risk factor for cesarean section among nulliparous women aged 40 and above. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:888–92.
Lowe NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:S16–24.
Rosaeg OP, Kitts JB, Koren G, Byfold LJ. Maternal and fetal effects of intravenous patient-controlled fentanyl analgesia during labour in a thrombocytopenic parturient. Can J Anaesth. 1992;39:277–81.
Scott JC, Ponganis KV, Stanski DR. EEG quantification of narcotic effect: the comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil. Anesthesiology. 1985;62:234–41.
Olofsson C, Ekblom A, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Hjelm A, Irestedt L. Lack of analgesic effect of systemically administered morphine or pethidine on labour pain. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;103:968–72.
Reynolds F, Crowhurst JA. Opioids in labour—no analgesic effect. Lancet. 1997;349:4–5.
Nelson KE, Eisenach JC. Intravenous butorphanol, meperidine, and their combination relieve pain and distress in women in labor. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:1008–13.
Liu EH, Sia AT. Rates of cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusion or opioid analgesia: systematic review. BMJ. 2004;328:1410–5.
Halpern SH, Leighton BL, Ohlsson A, Barrett JF, Rice A. Effect of epidural vs. parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta analysis. JAMA. 1998;280:2105–10.
Rayburn WF, Smith CV, Parriott JE, Woods RE. Randomized comparison of meperidine and fentanyl during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:604–6.
Jonsson M, Norden-Lindeberg S, Ostlund I, Hanson U. Acidemia at birth, related to obstetric characteristics and to oxytocin use, during the last two hours of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:745–50.
Morley-Forster PK, Weberpals J. Neonatal effect of patient-controlled analgesia using fentanyl in labor. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7:103–7.
Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT, Yaghmour E, Marcus RJL, Sherwani SS, Sproviero MT, Yilmaz M, Patel R, Robles C, Grouper S. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:655–65.
Sharma SK, McIntire DD, Wiley J, Leveno KJ. Labor analgesia and cesarean delivery: an individual patient meta-analysis of nulliparous women. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:142–8.
Evron S, Ezri T. Options for systemic labor analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20:181–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Hosokawa, Y., Morisaki, H., Nakatsuka, I. et al. Retrospective evaluation of intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia during labor. J Anesth 26, 219–224 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1292-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1292-3