Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of a novel rat model with pancreatic fistula and the prevention of this complication using tissue-engineered myoblast sheets

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is one of the most important complications of pancreatic surgery. The aims of this study were to establish a PF model in rats and to investigate the efficacy of our new method for preventing PF, which utilizes myoblast sheets made using tissue engineering techniques.

Methods

To establish a PF model, the rats underwent transection of each of four pancreatic ducts: the gastric, duodenal, common, and splenic ducts, respectively. Their ascitic amylase and lipase levels were then measured. To investigate the efficacy of myoblast sheets at preventing PF, a myoblast sheet was attached to the pancreatic stump in the PF models. The levels of amylase and lipase in both serum and ascites were then measured, and surgical specimens were investigated pathologically.

Results

The new PF model established by transecting the splenic duct in rats may prove very useful. There were no significant differences in serum amylase and lipase levels between the myoblast sheet (+) group and the sheet (−) group. However, there were significant differences in ascitic amylase and lipase levels between the two groups (p < 0.05). Among the pathological findings, the number of inflammatory cells in the myoblast sheet group was smaller than that in the control group. In addition, the presence of the myoblast sheets on the surface of the pancreatic stump was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate the efficacy of the new rat model of PF presented herein, and that it might be possible to prevent PF using myoblast sheets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Komagome M, Shin N, Cho N, Ishida T, et al. Risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:322–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, Beckett L, Bold RJ. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;183:237–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Christein JD, Kendrick ML, Iqbal CW, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB. Distal pancreatectomy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:922–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Velanovich V. Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:95–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92:539–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E, Scopelliti F, Casarotto A, Bassi C. Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2008;15:247–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Berge Henegouwen MI, De Wit LT, Van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Kanematsu T. Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2005;12:283–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Misawa T, Shiba H, Usuba T, Nojiri T, Uwagawa T, Ishida Y, et al. Safe and quick distal pancreatectomy using a staggered six-row stapler. Am J Surg. 2008;195:115–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A, Fourtanier G, Hay JM, Holmières F, et al. Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2003;237:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawai M, Tani M, Yamaue H. Transection using bipolar scissors reduces pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:366–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Watanabe K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, Yang J, Kikuchi A, Okano T, et al. Development of transplantable genetically modified corneal epithelial cell sheets for gene therapy. Biomaterials. 2007;28:745–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, Watanabe K, Yamamoto K, Adachi E, et al. Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Eng J Med. 2004;351:1187–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohki T, Yamato M, Murakami D, Takagi R, Yang J, Namiki H, et al. Treatment of esophageal ulcerations using endoscopic transplantation of tissue-engineered autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets in a canine model. Gut. 2006;55:1704–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hata H, Matsumiya G, Miyagawa S, Kondoh H, Kawaguchi N, Matsuura N, et al. Grafted skeletal myoblast sheets attenuate myocardial remodeling in pacing-induced canine heart failure model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:918–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Memon IA, Sawa Y, Fukushima N, Matsumiya G, Miyagawa S, Taketani S, et al. Repair of impaired myocardium by means of implantation of engineered autologous myoblast sheets. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:1333–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Page BJ, du Toit DF, Muller CJ, Mattysen J, Lyners R, et al. An immunocytochemical profile of the endocrine pancreas using an occlusive duct ligation model. JOP. 2000;1:191–203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Githens S. Differentiation and development of the pancreas in animals. In: Lang V, Go W, editors. The pancreas: biology, pathobiology and disease. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1993. p. 21–55.

  20. Balcom JH IV, Keck T, Warshaw AL, Graeme-Cook F, Fernández-del Castillo C, et al. Prevention of pancreatic fistula with a new synthetic, absorbable sealant: evaluation in a dog model. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:490–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Truty MJ, Sawyer MD, Que FG. Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:998–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maciver A, McCall M, Mihalicz D, Al-Adra D, Pawlick R, Shapiro AM. The use of bovine pericardial buttress on linear stapler fails to reduce pancreatic fistula incidence in a porcine pancreatic transaction model. HPB Surg. 2011;624060 (epub 25 Oct 2011).

  23. Choi SB, Lee JS, Kim WB, Song TJ, Suh SO, Choi SY. Efficacy of the omental roll-up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy as a strategy to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg. 2012;147:145–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsusue S, Takeda H, Nakamura Y, Nishimura S, Koizumi S. A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Surg Today. 1998;28:719–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Tsutsumi R, Tsuneoka N, Fukuda K, Haraguchi M, et al. Gastric wall-covering method for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic resection. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:935–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y, Nakamura S, Takeyoshi I, Ohya T, et al. Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg. 1998;22:494–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kajiyama Y, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Akiyama H. Quick and simple distal pancreatectomy using the GIA stapler: report of 35 cases. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1711.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T, Sekihara M, Hara T, Kori T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:922–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, Hori Y, Ueda T, Takeyama Y, et al. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg. 1999;86:608–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sugo H, Mikami Y, Matsumoto F, Tsumura H, Watanabe Y, Futagawa S. Comparison of ultrasonically activated scalpel versus conventional division for the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8:349–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsumoto T, Ishio T, Sasaki A, Aramaki M, Bandoh T, Kawano K. Pancreatic resection with ultrasonically activated scalpel: preliminary observation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:635–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Büchler M, Friess H, Klempa I, Hermanek P, Sulkowski U, Becker H, et al. Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complication following pancreatic resection. Am J Surg. 1992;163:125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Connor S, Alexakis N, Garden OJ, Leandros E, Bramis J, Wigmore SJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1059–67.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hackert T, Buchler MW, Wemer J. Surgical options in the management of pancreatic cancer. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:465–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260:920–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ohashi K, Yokoyama T, Yamato M, Kuge H, Kanehiro H, Tsutsumi M, et al. Engineering functional two- and three-dimensional liver systems in vivo using hepatic tissue sheets. Nat Med. 2007;13:880–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Takeda Science Foundation grants.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamotsu Kuroki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, T., Kuroki, T., Adachi, T. et al. Development of a novel rat model with pancreatic fistula and the prevention of this complication using tissue-engineered myoblast sheets. J Gastroenterol 48, 1081–1089 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-012-0706-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-012-0706-9

Keywords

Navigation