Abstract
Background
This study was conducted to assess the face, content and construct validity and the internal validity of the revised version of an instrument to measure the perceived needs of men diagnosed with prostate cancer [Prostate Cancer Needs Questionnaire version 2 (PCNQv2)]. The PCNQ was constructed in two parts with Part 1 measuring needs at diagnosis and initial treatment and Part 2 measuring current needs.
Methods
A random sample of 650 men diagnosed with prostate cancer attending a Urologist of the Hunter Urology Group in Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, were invited to participate in the study and sent by post the self-administered PCNQ. Information was provided on 145 men who were considered ineligible to participate. Completed questionnaires were received from 300 men.
Results
The principal components method of factor analysis with varimax orthogonal rotation identified eight factors with eigenvalues greater than 1, which together accounted for 68% of the variance in Part 1 of the PCNQ. Likewise, six factors were identified in Part 2 which accounted for 68% of the variance. Internal reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s alpha) were adequate for identified factors with values ranging from 0.71 to 0.90 for Part 1, and from 0.80 to 0.92 for Part 2.
Conclusions
These results support the validity and reliability of the PCNQv2 to assess the perceived needs experienced by men diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AIHW, AACR, Cancer in Australia 2000. AIHW cat. no. CAN 18. 2003, AIHW (Cancer Series no.23), Canberra
Coates M, Tracey E (2001) Cancer in New South Wales. Incidence and mortality 1998 and incidence for selected cancers 1999. NSW Central Cancer Registry. Cancer Research and Registers Division. NSW Cancer Council
Litwin MS et al (1998) Quality-of-life outcomes in long-term survivors of advanced prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 21(4):327–332
Skeel RT (1993) Quality of life dimensions that are the most important to cancer patients. Oncology 7:55–61
Ware JE, Davies-Avery A, Stewart AL (1978) The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction: a review of the literature. Health Med Care Serv Rev 1:1–15
Anderson PJ et al (1998) Prostate disease patients: planning services to meet their coping needs. Urol Nurs 18(3):195–197
Davis C et al (1998) Needs assessment of rural and remote women travelling to the city for breast cancer treatment. Aust N Z J Public Health 22(5):525–527
Foot GG, Sanson-Fisher R (1995) Measuring the unmet needs of people living with cancer. Cancer Forum 19(2):131–135
Sanson-Fisher R et al (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer 88(1):226–237
Bonevski B et al (2000) Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with care. Cancer 88:217–225
McDowell I, Newell C (1996) Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Bowling A (1997) Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham
Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH (1988) Clinical epidemiology: the essentials, 2nd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Streiner DL, Norman GR (1991) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Windsor R, Baranowski T, Clark N, Cutter G (1994) Evaluation of health promotion, health education, and disease prevention programs, 2nd edn. Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, CA
Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334
Duke JM et al (2003) Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer 97:993–1001
Aaronson NK et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376
Duke JM et al (2001) The perceived needs of men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Australas Epidemiol 8:34–43
Converse JM, Presser S (1986) Survey questions: handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA
Kim J, Mueller CW (1978) Factor analysis: statistical methods and practical issues. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills
StataCorp (1999) Stata statistical software: release 6.0. Stata Corporation, College Station, TX
Schafer JL (1998) Multiple imputation: a primer. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using multivariate statistics, 3rd edn. HarperCollins College, New York
Tinsley HE, Tinsley DJ (1987) Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 34(4):414–424
Kass RA, Tinsley HEA (1979) Factor analysis. J Leis Res 11:120–138
Kaplan RM, Saccuzzo DP (1982) Psychological testing: principles, applications, and issues. Brooks/Cole Publishing, California
Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Boberg EW et al (2003) Assessing the unmet information, support and care delivery needs of men with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns 49(3):233–242
Dahn JR et al (2004) Sexual functioning and quality of life after prostate cancer treatment: considering sexual desire. Urology 63(2):273–277
Clark JA et al (2003) Patients’ perceptions of quality of life after treatment for early prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(20):3777–3784
Hawe P, Degeling D, Hall J (1990) Evaluating health promotion: a health worker’s guide. Maclennan + Petty, Sydney
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a research grant from The University of Newcastle.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duke, J.M., Treloar, C.J. & Byles, J.E. Evaluation of a revised instrument to assess the needs of men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 13, 895–903 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0808-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0808-5