Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of video-assisted thyroidectomy and traditional thyroidectomy for the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is concern regarding the oncological effectiveness of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (VAT) for thyroid carcinoma. This study compared the surgical results of VAT and traditional thyroidectomy in patients with small papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC).

Methods

Of 44 patients with PTC offered the choice between VAT and traditional thyroidectomy, 21 underwent VAT and 23 underwent traditional thyroidectomy. Residual thyroid tissue and function were assessed postoperatively by measuring thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), T4, thyroglobulin, and anti-thyroglobulin antibody levels and with sonographic examination.

Results

Operative time, maximum tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, and TSH and T4 levels 4 weeks postoperatively were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05). Patients in the traditional thyroidectomy group had significantly higher postoperative serum thyroglobulin levels 4 weeks after surgery than did patients in the VAT group (5.4 versus 0.5 ng/ml, respectively; p = 0.007). Postoperative ultrasonography showed no residual thyroid tissue or evidence of recurrence in any of the patients. The median follow-up period was 60 months (range 31–77 month) for the VAT group and 53 months (range 31–80 months) for the traditional thyroidectomy group. Thyroglobulin levels of all patients in both groups decreased to <0.2 ng/ml at last follow-up.

Conclusions

VAT is safe and effective for the treatment of small papillary thyroid carcinomas, and has similar oncological effectiveness to traditional thyroidectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miccoli P, Pinchera A, Cecchini G, Conte M, Bendinelli C, Vignali E et al (1997) Minimally invasive, video-assisted parathyroid surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. J Endocrinol Invest 20:429–430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dhiman SV, Inabnet WB (2008) Minimally invasive surgery for thyroid diseases and thyroid cancer. J Surg Oncol 97:665–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Terris DJ, Angelos P, Steward DL, Simental AA (2008) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a multi-institutional North American experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:81–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai SY, Walvekar RR, Ferris RL (2008) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: expanded indications and oncologic completeness. Head Neck 30:1403–1407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Rio P, Berti M, Sommaruga L, Arcuri MF, Cataldo S, Sianesi M (2008) Pain after minimally invasive videoassisted and after minimally invasive open thyroidectomy-results of a prospective outcome study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:271–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Alesina PF, De Crea C, Traini E et al (2003) Video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surg Endosc 17:1604–1608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Materazzi G, Baldacci S, Rossi G (2001) Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 130:1039–1043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miccoli P, Elisei R, Materazzi G, Capezzone M, Galleri D, Pacini F et al (2002) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary carcinoma: a prospective study of its completeness. Surgery 32:1070–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaysberg M, Steward DL (2008) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope 118:786–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miccoli P, Bellantone R, Mourad M, Walz M, Raffaelli M, Berti P (2002) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: multiinstitutional experience. World J Surg 26:972–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gal I, Solymosi T, Szabo Z, Balint A, Bolgar G (2008) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 22:2445–2449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perigli G, Cortesini C, Qirici E, Boni D, Cianchi F (2008) Clinical benefits of minimally invasive techniques in thyroid surgery. World J Surg 32:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sgourakis G, Sotiropoulos GC, Neuhauser M, Musholt TJ, Karaliotas C, Lang H (2008) Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: is there any evidence-based information? Thyroid 18:721–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dobrinja C, Trevisan G, Liguori G (2009) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Initial experience in a general surgery department. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:273–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, D’alatri L, De Crea C, Marchese MR et al (2008) Video-assisted thyroidectomy significantly reduces the risk of early postthyroidectomy voice and swallowing symptoms. World J Surg 32:693–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P, De Crea C, Bellantone R (2007) Minimally invasive video-assisted functional lateral neck dissection for metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg 193:114–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, de Crea C, Princi P, Castaldi P, Spaventa A et al (2007) Report on 8 years of experience with video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery 142:944–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P, De Crea C, Bellantone R (2006) Video-assisted thryoidectomy: report on the experience of a single center in more than four hundred cases. World J Surg 30:794–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P, Lulli P, Rossi ED, Fadda G et al (2005) Safety of video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional survery. Head Neck 27:58–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chao TC, Lin JD, Chen MF (2004) Gasless video-assisted total thyroidectomy in the treatment of low risk intrathyroid papillary carcinoma. World J Surg 28:876–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salvatori M, Perotti G, Rufini V, Maussier ML, Dottorini M (2004) Are there disadvantages in administering 131I ablation therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma without a preablative diagnostic 131I whole-body scan? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 61:704–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P, De Crea C, Bellantone R (2006) Video-assisted thyroidectomy: report of a 7-year experience in Rome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:174–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Chun-Ting Wu, Li-Heng Yang, and Shou-Jen Kuo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Heng Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, CT., Yang, LH. & Kuo, SJ. Comparison of video-assisted thyroidectomy and traditional thyroidectomy for the treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surg Endosc 24, 1658–1662 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0826-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0826-3

Keywords

Navigation