Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hybrid process models for process optimisation, monitoring and control

  • Original papers
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hybrid models aim to describe different components of a process in different ways. This makes sense when the corresponding knowledge to be represented is different as well. In this way, the most efficient representations can be chosen and, thus, the model performance can be increased significantly. From the various possible variants of hybrid model, three are selected which were applied for important biotechnical processes, two of them from existing production processes. The examples show that hybrid models are powerful tools for process optimisation, monitoring and control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonissone PP (1995) Discussion: fuzzy logic control technology: a personal perspective. Technometrics 37:262–266

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cybenko G (1989) Approximations by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signal Syst 2:303–314

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dors M, Simutis R, Lübbert A (1995) Hybrid process modeling for advanced process state estimation, prediction, and control exemplified in a production-scale mammalian cell culture. ACS Symp Ser 613:144–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Galvanauskas V, Lübbert A (2002) Monitoring recombinant protein concentrations in production processes (submitted)

  5. Horiuchi JI, Hiraga K (1999) Industrial application of fuzzy control to large-scale recombinant vitamin B2 production. J Biosci Bioeng 87:365–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Horiuchi JI, Kishimoto M (2002) Application of fuzzy control to industrial processes in Japan. Fuzzy Sets Syst 128:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matlab (2002) Matlab 6. The Math Works Inc., Natick, Massachusetts

  8. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313

    Google Scholar 

  9. Park TY, Froment GF (1998) A hybrid genetic algorithm for the estimation of parameters in detailed kinetic models. Comput Chem Eng 22:S103–S110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Preusting H, Noordover J, Simutis R, Lübbert A (1996) The use of hybrid modeling for the optimization of the penicillin fermentation process. Chimia 50:416–417

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roubos H (2002) Bioprocess modelling and optimisation. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

  12. Roubos JA, Babuska R, Krabben P, Heijnen JJ (2000) Hybrid modeling of fed-batch bioprocesses; combination of physical equations with metabolic networks and black-box kinetics. Journal A, Benelux Q J Automatic Control 41:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schubert J, Simutis R, Dors M Havlik I, Lübbert A (1994) Bioprocess optimization and control: application of hybrid modelling. J Biotechnol 35:51–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shioya S, Shimizu K, Yoshida T (1999) Knowledge-based design and operation of bioprocess systems. J Biosci Bioeng 87:261–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Simutis R, Havlik I, Lübbert A (1993) Fuzzy aided neural network for real time state estimation and process prediction in a production scale beer fermentation. J Biotechnol 27:203–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sjöberg J, Zhang Q, Ljung L, Benveniste A, Delyon B, Glorennec PY, Hjalmarsson H, Juditsky A (1995) Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: a unified overview. Automatica 31:1691–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmermann HJ (1983) Fuzzy mathematical programming. Comput Oper Res 10:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung, Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD) and Deutsches Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) for their generous support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Bioengineering, Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany

    V. Galvanauskas, R. Simutis & A. Lübbert

Authors
  1. V. Galvanauskas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Simutis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Lübbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Lübbert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galvanauskas, V., Simutis, R. & Lübbert, A. Hybrid process models for process optimisation, monitoring and control. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 26, 393–400 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-004-0385-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-004-0385-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation