Abstract
Fluctuations of local but connected populations may show correlation or synchrony whenever they experience significant dispersal or correlated environmental biotic and abiotic variability. Synchrony may be an important variable in multispecies systems, but its nature and implications have not been explicitly examined. Because the number of locally coexisting species (richness) affects the population variability of community members, we manipulated richness under different regimes of environmental fluctuation (EF). We predicted that the temporal synchrony of populations in a species should decline with increasing richness of the metacommunity they live in. Additionally, we predicted that specialist species that are sensitive to a specific environmental factor would show higher synchronization when EF increases. We thus created experimental communities with varied richness, EF, and species specialization to examine the synchronizing effects of these factors on three aquatic invertebrate species. We created four levels of richness and three levels of EF by manipulating the salinity of the culture media. Monocultures exhibited higher population synchrony than metacommunities of 2–4 species. Furthermore, we found that species responded differently to EF treatments: high EF enhanced population synchrony for the specialist and intermediate species, but not for the generalist species. Our findings emphasize that the magnitude of EF and species richness both contribute to determine population synchrony, and importantly, our results suggest that biotic diversity may actually stabilize metacommunities by disrupting synchrony.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai Y, Han X, Wu J, Chen Z, Li L (2004) Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nature 431:181–184
Bengtsson BE (1978) Use of harpacticoid copepods in toxicity tests. Mar Pollut Bull 9:238–241
Benton TG, Lapsley CT, Beckerman AP (2001) Population synchrony and environmental variation: an experimental demonstration. Ecol Lett 4:236–243
Bjørnstad ON, Ims RA, Lambin X (1999) Spatial population dynamics: analysing patterns and proccess of population synchrony. Trends Ecol Evol 14:427–432
Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC (1994) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Cottenie K (2005) Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett 8:1175–1182
Doak DF, Bigger D, Harding EK, Marvier MA, O’Malley RE, Thomson D (1998) The statistical inevitability of stability–diversity relationships in community ecology. Amer Nat 151:264–276
Earn D, Levin SA, Rohani P (2000) Coherence and conservation. Science 290:1360–1364
Ellis AM, Lounibos LP, Holyoak M (2006) Evaluating the long-term metacommunity dynamics of tree hole mosquitoes. Ecology 10:2582–2590
Fontaine C, Gonzalez A (2005) Population synchrony induced by resource fluctuations and dispersal in an aquatic microcosm. Ecology 86:1463–1471
Gouhier TC, Guichard F, Gonzalez A (2010) Synchrony and stability of food webs in metacommunities. Amer Nat 175:E16–E34
Greenman JV, Benton TG (2001) The impact of stochasticity on nonlinear population models: synchrony and the Moran effect. Oikos 93:343–351
Grenfell BT, Wilson K, Finkenstädt BF, Clutton Brock TH, Crawley MJ (1998) Noise and determinism in synchronized sheep dynamics. Nature 394:674–677
Grenfell BT, Wilson K, Finkenstädt BF, Clutton Brock TH, Crawley MJ (2000) Ecology—nonlinearity and the Moran effect. Nature 406:847
Heino M, Kaitala V, Ranta E, Lindström J (1997) Synchronous dynamics and rates of extinction in spatially structured populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:481–486
Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (2005) Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hudson OJ, Cattadori IM (1999) The Moran effect: a cause of population synchrony. Trends Ecol Evol 14:1–2
Ims RA, Andreassen HP (2000) Spatial synchronization of vole population dynamics by predatory birds. Nature 408:194–197
Ives AR (1995) Predicting the response of populations to environmental change. Ecology 76:926–941
Jiang L, Zhichao P (2009) Different effects of species diversity on temporal stability in single trophic and multitrophic communities. Amer Nat 174:651–659
Jorgensen J, Rossignol A, Puccia C, Levins R (2000) On the variance of eigenvalues of the community matrix: derivation and appraisal. Ecology 81:2928–2931
Keitt TH (2008) Coherent ecological dynamics induced by large scale disturbance. Nature 454:331–334
Kirkpatrick M (2009) Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions. Genetica 136:271–284
Koelle K, Vandermeer J (2005) Dispersal-induced desynchronization: from metapopulations to metacommunities. Ecol Lett 8:175–176
Kolasa J, Drake JA, Huxel GR, Hewitt CL (1996) Hierarchy underlies patterns of variability in species inhabiting natural microcosms. OIKOS 77:259–266
Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet M, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613
Liebhold AD, Koenig WD, Bjørnstand ON (2004) Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:467–490
Loreau M, de Mazancourt C (2008) Species synchrony and its drivers: neutral and non neutral community dynamics in fluctuating environments. Amer Nat 172:E48–E66
McCann KS (2000) The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405:223–228
Melbourne BA, Hastings A (2008) Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity. Nature 454:100–103
Moran PAP (1953) The statistical analysis of the Canadian lynx cycle. II. Synchronization and meteorology. Austral J Zool 1:291–298
Naeem S, Li S (1997) Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:507–509
Pandit SN, Kolasa J (2012) Opposite effects of environmental variability and species richness on temporal turnover of species in a complex habitat mosaic. Hydrobiologia 685:145–154
Pandit SN, Kolasa J, Cottenie K (2009) Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists—an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework. Ecology 90:2253–2262
Paradis E, Baillie SR, Sutherland WJ, Gregory RD (2000) Spatial synchrony in populations of birds: effects of habitat, population trend, and spatial scale. Ecology 81:2112–2125
Ranta E, Kaitala K, Lindstrom J, Helle H (1997a) The Moran effect and synchrony in population dynamics. Oikos 78:136–142
Ranta E, Kaitala K, Lindstrom J (1997b) External disturbances and population dynamics. Ann Zool Fennici 34:127–132
Ranta E, Lundberg P, Kaitala V (2006) Ecology of populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Reed DH (2008) Effects of population size on population variability: from mutation to environmental catastrophes. In: Carroll SP, Fox CW (eds) Conservation biology: evaluation in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 16–34
Ripa J (2000) Analyzing the Moran effect and dispersal: their significance and interaction in synchronous population dynamics. Oikos 89:175–187
Rooney N, McCann K, Gellner G, Moore JC (2006) Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature 442:265–269
Royama T (2005) Moran effect on nonlinear population process. Ecol Monogr 75:277–293
Teng J, McCann KS (2004) Dynamics of compartmented and reticulate food webs. Am Nat 164:86–100
Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vasseur DA, Fox JW (2007) Environmental fluctuations can stabilize food web dynamics by increasing synchrony. Ecol Lett 10:1066–1074
Vasseur DA, Fox JW (2009) Phase-locking and environmental fluctuations generate synchrony in a predator–prey community. Nature 460:1007–1010
Verhoeven KJF, Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM (2005) Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108:643–647
Weber CI (ed)(1993) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms (US EPA/600/4–90/027F). US EPA, Washington, DC
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a NSERC operating grant to JK. We thank Dr. A. Hayward for suggestions to improve the experimental design and Dr. D. Vasseur for insightful comments on the manuscript. The authors are grateful to three anonymous reviewers who provided valuable comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank Dr. Pedro Peres-Neto for his valuable suggestions on some of the analysis in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Elena Litchman.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pandit, S.N., Kolasa, J. & Cottenie, K. Population synchrony decreases with richness and increases with environmental fluctuations in an experimental metacommunity. Oecologia 171, 237–247 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2407-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2407-8