Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geographical variation in the influence of density dependence and climate on the recruitment of Norwegian moose

  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of variation in climate on population dynamics are likely to differ within the distributional range of a species, yet the consequences of such regional variation on demography and population dynamics are rarely considered. Here we examine how density dependence and different climate variables affect spatio-temporal variation in recruitment rates of Norwegian moose using data collected over a large geographical area during the hunting season. After accounting for observation error by a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo technique, temporal variation in recruitment rates was relatively independent of fluctuations in local population size. In fact, a positive relationship was as common as a density-dependent decrease in fecundity rates. In general, high recruitment rates were found during autumn 1 year after years with a warm February, and after a warm May or cold June in year t − 1 or in year t. Large regional variation was also found in the effects of some of the weather variables, especially during spring. These patterns demonstrate both direct and delayed effects of weather on the recruitment of moose that possibly operate through an effect of body mass on the proportion of the females that sexually mature as 1.5 or 2.5 years old.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aanes R, Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Aanes S, Strand O, Øritsland NA (2003) Synchrony in Svalbard reindeer population dynamics. Can J Zool 81:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergström R, Danell K (1995) Effects of simulated summer browsing by moose on leaf and shoot biomass of birch, Betula pendula. Oikos 72:132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Newman KB, Thomas L, Koesters NB (2004) State–space models for the dynamics of wild animal populations. Ecol Modell 171:157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS (2007) Models for ecological data. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, Bjørnstad ON (2004) Population time series: process variability, observation errors, missing values, lags, and hidden states. Ecology 85:3140–3150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay JP, Dussault C, Waller DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Valpine P, Hastings A (2002) Fitting population models incorporating process noise and observation error. Ecol Monogr 72:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1924) Periodic fluctuations in the number of animals: their causes and effects. Br J Exp Biol 2:119–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen S, Lande R, Sæther B-E, Bregnballe T (2005) Estimating the pattern of synchrony in fluctuating populations. J Anim Ecol 74:601–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engen S, Lande R, Sæther B-E, Festa-Bianchet M (2007) Using reproductive value to estimate key parameters in density-independent age-structured populations. J Theor Biol 244:208–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson G, Wallin K (1994) Antallet älgar som ses—bare en fråga om hur månge som finns? Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson G, Wallin K (1999) Hunter observations as an index of moose Alces alces population parameters. Wildl Biol 5:177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1981) Density dependence as related to life-history strategy. Ecology 62:602–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1987) A review of density dependence in populations of large mammals. Curr Mammal 1:401–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzmann AW, Schwartz CC (1985) Moose twinning rates—a possible population condition assessment. J Wildl Manage 49:394–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM, Mercer WE, Gellately RB (1988) Population dynamics of Newfoundland moose using cohort analysis. J Wildl Manage 52:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Festa Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangsei L (1999) Er alle elgar like lette å observere? Evaluering av sett-elg metodikk ut frå samanlikning med modellpopulasjonar bygd på kohortanalyse. Norwegian Norges Landbrukshøgskole, Ås

  • Garel M, Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E, Grøtan V, Tufto J, Heim M (2009) Age, size, and spatiotemporal variation in ovulation patterns of a seasonal breeder, the Norwegian moose (Alces alces). Am Nat 173:89–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grosbois V, Gimenez O, Gaillard JM, Pradel R, Barbraud C, Clobert J, Møller AP, Weimerskirch H (2008) Assessing the impact of climate variation on survival in vertebrate populations. Biol Rev 83:357–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Grøtan V, Sæther B-E, Engen S, Solberg EJ, Linnell JDC, Andersen R, Brøseth H, Lund E (2005) Climate causes large-scale spatial synchrony in population fluctuations of a temperate herbivore. Ecology 86:1472–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grøtan V, Sæther B-E, Filli F, Engen S (2008) Effects of climate on population fluctuations of ibex. Glob Change Biol 14:218–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett TB, Coulson T, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Grenfell BT (2004) Why large-scale climate indices seem to predict ecological processes better than local weather. Nature 430:71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herfindal I, Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E, Høgda KA, Andersen R (2006a) Environmental phenology and geographical gradients in moose body mass. Oecologia 150:213–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herfindal I, Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Andersen R, Høgda KA (2006b) Population characteristics predict responses in moose body mass to temporal variation in the environment. J Anim Ecol 75:1110–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hjeljord O, Histøl T (1999) Range-body mass interactions of a northern ungulate—a test of hypothesis. Oecologia 119:326–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjeljord O, Rønning E, Histøl T (2000) Yearling moose body mass: importance of first year’s growth rate and selective feeding. Alces 36:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Engen S, Sæther B-E, Coulson T (2006) Estimating density dependence from time series of population age structure. Am Nat 168:76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langvatn R, Mysterud A, Stenseth NC, Yoccoz NG (2004) Timing and synchrony of ovulation in red deer constrained by short northern summers. Am Nat 163:763–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavsund S, Nygren T, Solberg EJ (2003) Status of moose populations and challenges to moose management in Fennoscandia. Alces 39:109–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen A (1999) National atlas of Norway: vegetation. Norwegian Mapping Authority, Hønefoss

    Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC, Langvatn R (2000) Relationships between sex ratio, climate and density in red deer: the importance of spatial scale. J Anim Ecol 69:959–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Stenseth NC, Yoccoz NG, Langvatn R, Steinheim G (2001) Nonlinear effects of large-scale climatic variability on wild and domestic herbivores. Nature 410:1096–1099

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Post E, Stenseth NC (1999) Climate change, plant phenology, and northern ungulates. Ecology 80:1322–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolandsen CR, Solberg EJ, Tufto J, Sæther B-E, Heim M (2003) Factors affecting detectability of moose Alces alces during the hunting season in northern Norway. Alces 39:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E (1985) Annual variation in carcass weight of Norwegian moose in relation to climate along a latitudinal gradient. J Wildl Manage 49:977–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E (1997) Environmental stochasticity and population dynamics of large herbivores: a search for mechanisms. Trends Ecol Evol 12:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Andersen R (1990) Resource limitation in a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces: ecological constraints on behavioral decisions. Can J Zool 68:993–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Gravem AJ (1988) Annual variation in winter body condition of Norwegian moose calves. J Wildl Manage 52:333–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Haagenrud H (1983) Life history of the moose (Alces alces): fecundity rates in relation to age and carcass weight. J Mammal 64:226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Haagenrud H (1985) Life history of the moose (Alces alces): relationship between growth and reproduction. Holarct Ecol 8:100–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Andersen R, Hjeljord O, Heim M (1996) Ecological correlates of regional variation in life history of the moose, Alces alces. Ecology 77:1493–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Engen S, Møller AP, Matthysen E, Adriansen F, Fiedler W, Leivits A, Lambrechts MM, Visser ME, Anker-Nilssen T, Both C, Dhondt AA, McCleery RH, McMeeking J, Potti J, Røstad OW, Thomson D (2003a) Climate variation and regional gradients in population dynamics of two hole—nesting passerines. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:2397–2404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Heim M (2003b) Effects of altering sex ratio structure on the demography of an isolated moose population. J Wildl Manage 67:455–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Sutherland WJ, Engen S (2004) Climate influences on a population dynamics. Adv Ecol Res 35:185–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Grøtan V, Tryjanowski P, Barbraud C, Engen S, Fulin M (2006) Climate and spatio-temporal variation in the population dynamics of a long-distance migrant, the white stork. J Anim Ecol 75:80–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Engen S, Grøtan V, Fiedler W, Matthysen E, Visser ME, Wright J, Møller AP, Adriaensen F, van Balen H, Balmer D, Mainwaring MC, McCleery RH, Pampus M, Winkel W (2007a) The extended Moran effect and large-scale synchronous fluctuations in the size of great tit and blue tit populations. J Anim Ecol 76:315–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Lillegård M, Grøtan V, Filli F, Engen S (2007b) Predicting fluctuations of reintroduced ibex populations: the importance of density dependence, environmental stochasticity and uncertain population estimates. J Anim Ecol 76:326–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Engen S, Solberg EJ, Heim M (2007c) Estimating the growth of a newly established moose population using reproductive value. Ecography 30:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Lillegård M, Grøtan V, Drever MC, Engen S, Nudds TD, Podruzny KM (2008) Geographical gradients in the population dynamics of North American prairie ducks. J Anim Ecol 76:869–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand H (1996) Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia 106:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand H, Cederlund G, Danell K (1995) Geographical and latitudinal variation in growth patterns and adult body size of Swedish moose (Alces alces). Oecologia 102:433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogland T (1983) The effects of density dependent resource limitation on size of wild reindeer. Oecologia 60:156–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogland T (1985) The effects of density-dependent resource limitations on the demography of wild reindeer. J Anim Ecol 64:359–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E (1994) Male traits as life history variables: annual variation in body mass and antler size in moose (Alces alces). J Mammal 75:1069–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E (1999) Hunter observations of moose Alces alces as a management tool. Wildl Biol 5:107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E, Strand O, Loison A (1999) Dynamics of a harvested moose population in a variable environment. J Anim Ecol 68:186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Ringsby TH, Sæther B-E, Heim M (2002) Biased adult sex ratio can affect fecundity in primiparous moose. Wildl Biol 8:109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Loison A, Gaillard J-M, Heim M (2004) Lasting effects of conditions at birth on moose body mass. Ecography 27:677–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Rolandsen CM, Heim M, Grøtan V, Garel M, Sæther B-E, Nilsen EB, Austrheim G, Herfindal I (2006a) Elgen i Norge sett med jegerøyne. En analyse av jaktmaterialet fra overvåkningsprogrammet for elg og det samlede sett elg-materialet for perioden 1966–2004. NINA Rapp 125:1–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Langvatn R, Andersen R, Strand O, Heim M, Jordøy P, Holmstrøm F, Solem MI (2006b) Egenevaluering av overvåkningsprogrammet for hjortevilt. Framtidig overvåkning sett i lys av 15 års erfaring. NINA Rapp 156:1–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2003) WinBUGS user manual version 1.4 http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs/winbugs/manual14.pdf

  • Stenseth NC, Chan KS, Tong H, Boonstra R, Boutin S, Krebs CJ, Post E, O’Donoghue M, Yoccoz NG, Forchhammer MC, Hurrell JW (1999) Common dynamic structure of Canada lynx populations within three climatic regions. Science 285:1071–1073

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stubsjøen T, Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Heim M, Rolandsen CM (2000) Moose (Alces alces) survival in three populations in northern Norway. Am Nat 78:1822–1830

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson JE, Wabakken P, Sandegren F, Bjärvall A, Franzén R, Söderberg A (1995) The near extinction and recovery of brown bears in Scandinavia in relation to the bear management policies of Norway and Sweden. Wildl Biol 1:11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvén S (2000) Effects of scale on hunter moose Alces alces observation rate. Wildl Biol 6:157–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D, Arnold R, Spiegelhalter D (2004) GeoBUGS user manual version 1.2

  • Wabakken P, Sand H, Liberg O, Bjärvall A (2001) The recovery, distribution, and population dynamics of wolves on the Scandinavian peninsula, 1978–1998. Can J Zool 79:710–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CK, Ives AR, Applegate RD (2003) Population dynamics across geographical ranges: time-series analyses of three small game species. Ecology 84:2654–2667

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Research Council of Norway (NORKLIMA) and the Directorate for Nature Management. We thank J. Ball for excellent comments on a previous version. R-codes for performing the MCMC analyses can be obtained from the senior author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernt-Erik Sæther.

Additional information

Communicated by Janne Sundell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grøtan, V., Sæther, BE., Lillegård, M. et al. Geographical variation in the influence of density dependence and climate on the recruitment of Norwegian moose. Oecologia 161, 685–695 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1419-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1419-5

Keywords

Navigation