Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Niche differences in phenology and rooting depth promote coexistence with a dominant C4 bunchgrass

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial and temporal niche differentiation are potential mechanisms of plant species’ coexistence in many communities, including many grasslands. In a 6-year field experiment, a dominant prairie bunchgrass, Schizachyrium scoparium, excluded species sharing similar phenology and rooting depth, but coexisted with species differing in phenology and rooting depth. We used a series of experimental plots that differed in S. scoparium abundance to measure the effect of S. scoparium on abundances of other species and on soil nitrate concentrations across time and depth. Because we found that S. scoparium most strongly reduced soil nitrate levels at mid-season and at shallow depths, we hypothesized that at higher S. scoparium abundance, species with mid-season phenology and shallow roots would be excluded and that deep-rooted and early season species would be more likely to persist. As predicted, the proportional number and cover of species exploiting different niches than S. scoparium (early season and deep-rooted species) increased across the S. scoparium abundance gradient. This work provides novel empirical evidence for the factors that contribute to species coexistence in the field. Our study suggests that spatial and temporal niche differentiation promote species coexistence in these grasslands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarssen LW, Epp GA (1990) Neighbour manipulations in natural vegetation: a review. J Veg Sci 1:13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong RA, McGehee R (1980) Competitive exclusion. Am Nat 115:151–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G (2001) Neutral macroecology. Science 293:2413–2418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berendse F (1979) Competition between plant populations with different rooting depths I. Theoretical considerations. Oecologia 43:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton SP (1976) Resource division in an understory herb community: responses to temporal and microtopographic gradients. Am Nat 110:679–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (1994) Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theor Popul Biol 45:227–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis JT (1959) Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter AH (1982) Influence of soil heterogeneity on the coexistence of grassland species. J Ecol 70:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitter AH (1986) Spatial and temporal patterns of root activity in a species-rich alluvial grassland. Oecologia 69:594–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson DJ (1988) The maintenance of plant and soil heterogeneity in dune grassland. J Ecol 76:497–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Barton AN (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. Am Nat 139:771–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye, RS, Huntley NJ, Tilman D, Tester J, Stillwell M, and Zinnel K (1987) Old-field succession on a Minnesota sand plain. Ecology 68:12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions of terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamolos AP, Veresoglou DS (2000) Patterns of root activity and responses of species to nutrients in vegetation of fertile alluvial soil. Plant Ecol 148:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamolos AP, Elisseou GK, Veresoglou DS (1995) Depth of root activity of coexisting grassland species in relation to N and P additions, measured using radioactive tracers. J Ecol 83:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKane RB, Grigal DF, Russelle MP (1990) Spatiotemporal differences in 15N uptake and the organization of an old-field plant community. Ecology 71:1126–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKane RB, Johnson LC, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Rastetter EB, Fry B, Giblin AE, Kielland K, Kwiatkowski BL, Laundre JA, Murray G (2002) Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in artic tundra. Nature 415:68–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish JAD, Bazzaz FA (1976) Underground niche separation in successional plants. Ecology 57:1281–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2001) JMP 4.0.4. Cary, NC, USA

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun GW, Coffin DP, Lauenroth WK (1997) Comparison of root distributions of species in North American grasslands using GIS. J Veg Sci 8:587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1989) Competition, nutrient reduction and the competitive neighborhood of a bunchgrass. Funct Ecol 3:215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1990) Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Wedin D (1991) Plant traits and resource reduction for five grasses growing on a nitrogen gradient. Ecology 72:685–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veresoglou DS, Fitter AH (1984) Spatial and temporal patterns of growth and nutrient uptake of five co-existing grasses. J Ecol 72:259–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver JE (1958) Classification of root systems of forbs of grassland and a consideration of their significance. Ecology 39:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedin DA, Tilman D (1990) Species effect on nitrogen cycle: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84:433–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedin D, Tilman D (1993) Competition among grasses along a nitrogen gradient: initial conditions and mechanisms of competition. Ecol Monogr 63:199–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SD, Tilman D (1993) Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74:599–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ (2002) Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeaton RI, Travis J Gilinsky E (1977) Competition and spacing in plant communities: the Arizona upland association. J Ecol 65:587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Troy Mielke and Stan Harpole for help in the field, Olivia Damon for chemical analysis, Dennis Cook for statistical advice, and the two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments. The experiments performed here comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Fargione.

Additional information

Communicated by Rowan Sage

Appendix

Appendix

The appendix lists species found in the study and their phenology and rooting depth classification. B/P indicates species that exhibit both biennial and perennial life history at Cedar Creek Natural History Area. W. Annual indicates winter annual species, which germinate in the fall, overwinter as seedlings, and in the summer produce seed that germinates during the same growing season.

Species

Phenology

Rooting depth

Photo-synthetic pathway

Number of plots present

Life history

Agropyron repens

Early

Deep

C3

28

Perennial

Berteroa incana

Early

Deep

C3

12

B/P

Lychnis alba

Early

Deep

C3

16

B/P

Poa pratensis

Early

Deep

C3

14

Perennial

Polygonum convolvulus

Early

Deep

C3

16

Annual

Rudbeckia serotina

Early

Deep

C3

4

B/P

Vicia villosa

Early

Deep

C3

21

W. annual

Agrostis alba

Early

Shallow

C3

4

Perennial

Agrostis scabra

Early

Shallow

C3

2

Perennial

Crepis tectorum

Early

Shallow

C3

2

Biennial

Hedeoma hispida

Early

Shallow

C3

14

Annual

Lepidium densiflorum

Early

Shallow

C3

8

W. annual

Oxalis stricta

Early

Shallow

C3

2

Perennial

Rumex acetosella

Early

Shallow

C3

3

Perennial

Silene antirrhina

Early

Shallow

C3

4

Annual

Andropogon gerardi

Mid

Deep

C4

4

Perennial

Asclepias syriaca

Mid

Deep

C3

3

Perennial

Erigeron canadensis

Mid

Deep

C3

4

W. annual

Monarda fistulosa

Mid

Deep

C3

11

Perennial

Panicum oligosanthes

Mid

Deep

C4

2

Perennial

Petalostemum candidum

Mid

Deep

C3

1

Perennial

Sorghastrum nutans

Mid

Deep

C4

1

Perennial

Verbascum thapsus

Mid

Deep

C3

3

Biennial

Ambrosia artemisiifolia

Mid

Shallow

C3

14

Annual

Digitaria ischaemum

Mid

Shallow

C4

13

Annual

Setaria lutescens (glauca)

Mid

Shallow

C4

10

Annual

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fargione, J., Tilman, D. Niche differences in phenology and rooting depth promote coexistence with a dominant C4 bunchgrass. Oecologia 143, 598–606 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0010-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0010-y

Keywords

Navigation